In this July 14, 2019 email, attorney Paul Cassell contacts a redacted recipient (likely a prosecutor) regarding the legal representation of Jane Doe 1 and 2. Cassell discusses a forthcoming brief responding to Jeffrey Epstein's claims about the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), specifically arguing that the NPA is limited to the Southern District of Florida. He offers to share the draft with the recipient's office prior to filing to ensure coordination and avoid interference.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Paul Cassell | Attorney / Professor |
Sender of the email; attorney representing Jane Doe 1 and 2; Professor at University of Utah.
|
| Jane Doe 1 | Victim / Client |
Represented by Paul Cassell within the legal filings mentioned.
|
| Jane Doe 2 | Victim / Client |
Represented by Paul Cassell within the legal filings mentioned.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant / Subject |
Mentioned regarding his legal claim that victims cannot obtain rescission and the scope of his NPA.
|
| [Redacted] | Recipient |
Likely a government official or prosecutor ('your Office') whose efforts Cassell wishes not to interfere with.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah |
Employer of Paul Cassell.
|
|
| U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida |
Mentioned in the legal argument regarding the scope of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA).
|
|
| Utah State Bar |
Bar where Paul Cassell is admitted.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction mentioned in relation to the NPA's scope.
|
|
|
Location of S.J. Quinney College of Law.
|
"THIS CASE MUST BE DECIDED ON THE AGREED PREMISE THAT THE NPA ONLY COVERS THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA."Source
"I am drafting our response to Epstein's claim that the victims cannot obtain 'rescission' as a remedy."Source
"Because my clients would like to avoid interfering with your efforts in any way, would you like to see our draft before it is filed?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,608 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document