U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Subject of investigation |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-01-01 | Investigation | A Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office's interactions... | Southern District of Florida | View |
032.pdf
This document is a Decision & Order by U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman denying Jeffrey Epstein's request for pretrial release and granting the Government's motion for remand (detention). The Court concludes that the Government has shown by clear and convincing evidence that Epstein poses a danger to the community, citing testimony from victims and evidence of potential witness tampering and non-compliance with sex offender registration. Additionally, the Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that Epstein is a flight risk due to his vast wealth, international ties, and the potential for a lengthy prison sentence, and determines that the defense's proposed bail package is inadequate to mitigate these risks.
034.pdf
This document is a motion filed on June 3, 2009, by a redacted nonparty (a victim of Jeffrey Epstein) seeking to unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and its addendum in the Florida state criminal case. The motion argues the sealing violated Florida judicial rules and public policy, and that the documents are material to the victim's pending civil suit. Exhibits include judgments of conviction against Epstein for solicitation and procuring a minor, sealing orders from 2008, and transcripts from the June 30, 2008 plea conference where the existence of the federal NPA was discussed in open court.
EFTA00032969.pdf
This document is an internal Department of Justice email chain from August 2020. It details the distribution of a draft report by the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) regarding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) by the Southern District of Florida between 2006 and 2008. The Acting U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and their team are coordinating a review of this draft to identify any sensitive information that might impact ongoing investigations.
EFTA00030231.pdf
This document is an email dated June 26, 2019, forwarding a Law360 article titled 'Gov't Says Epstein Victims Can't Scrap Nonprosecution Deal.' The article details the federal government's response to a lawsuit by Epstein's victims (Doe v. U.S.), where prosecutors argued that while the Crime Victims Rights Act (CVRA) was violated by Alexander Acosta in 2008, the nonprosecution agreement cannot be undone. The government proposed a meeting and a public hearing for victims to be heard, a remedy the victims' lawyer Brad Edwards criticized as insufficient.
EFTA00028103.pdf
A formal 'Touhy request' letter dated August 30, 2021, from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney Christian Everdell to Assistant Attorney General Kenneth Polite. The letter requests the testimony of four redacted FBI/Task Force agents for Maxwell's upcoming trial. These agents were involved in two key investigations: the 2006-2008 Palm Beach FBI investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and the subsequent New York FBI investigation that led to the 2019/2020 indictments of Epstein and Maxwell.
EFTA00027770.pdf
This document is an email from May 2019 forwarding a Law360 article titled 'Epstein Victims Demand Apology From Prosecutors'. The article details how two victims (Jane Does) requested a Florida federal court to nullify the 2008 non-prosecution agreement signed by then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, arguing it violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The victims sought nullification of the deal, a reopening of the criminal case, an apology, and a hearing with Acosta and Epstein present.
EFTA00022091.pdf
This Opinion & Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York addresses multiple pretrial motions filed by defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan denies most of the motions, including those seeking dismissal based on Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, statute of limitations, and pre-indictment delay, but grants the motion to sever the perjury counts for a separate trial.
EFTA00018995.pdf
This document is an email chain between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) from August 2020, forwarded in March 2021. SDNY officials, supervising the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell, request access to scan and review boxes of evidence from the prior SDFL investigation into Jeffrey Epstein stored in West Palm Beach. The SDFL official confirms the materials are in a secure room and references a previous Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) inquiry involving the same documents.
EFTA00018568.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 2020 discussing technical difficulties with a large PDF file received by the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The file is a draft report from the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) regarding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein matter by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida between 2006 and 2008. SDNY staff were attempting to make the 380+ page report text-searchable.
EFTA00018566.pdf
This document contains an email chain from August 2020 involving the Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). OPR Counsel Laura Ingersoll transmitted a draft report regarding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein matter by the Southern District of Florida (2006-2008) to the Acting US Attorney for SDNY. Subsequent internal USANYS emails discuss sharing this draft report with the 'Maxwell team' for their review and comments.
EFTA00018186.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 2021 between an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) and a FedEx Senior Paralegal. The AUSA is seeking a records custodian to authenticate FedEx shipping records originally subpoenaed in 2008 by the Southern District of Florida for use in the upcoming trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The FedEx paralegal asks if the records relate to Jeffrey Epstein, and subsequently agrees to testify if necessary.
EFTA00017797.pdf
This document is an email from the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) on August 6, 2020, attaching a draft report concerning the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein matter by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida between 2006 and 2008 for review. The email includes names of redacted individuals from both organizations and mentions an AUSA in the CC.
EFTA00016596.pdf
A formal response from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Jeffrey Epstein's defense team regarding discovery requests made in July and August 2019. The government rejects defense requests for broad access to files from other districts (FL, GA) and communications with victims as 'outlandishly overbroad' and a 'fishing expedition' to identify victims, while confirming it will comply with standard legal obligations (Rule 16, Brady). The letter asserts the SDNY investigation was independent of the previous Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement.
EFTA00015560.pdf
In this July 14, 2019 email, attorney Paul Cassell contacts a redacted recipient (likely a prosecutor) regarding the legal representation of Jane Doe 1 and 2. Cassell discusses a forthcoming brief responding to Jeffrey Epstein's claims about the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), specifically arguing that the NPA is limited to the Southern District of Florida. He offers to share the draft with the recipient's office prior to filing to ensure coordination and avoid interference.
EFTA00013926.pdf
This document is a legal response filed on August 1, 2008, by attorneys for victims (Jane Doe #1 and #2) in the Jeffrey Epstein case, arguing that the U.S. Government violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The filing details how the U.S. Attorney's Office and the FBI secretly entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement with Epstein in September 2007 while misleading victims for months that the investigation was ongoing and that federal charges were still possible. The motion requests the court to order the government to produce the full Non-Prosecution Agreement and FBI interview reports, and to schedule a hearing to determine the appropriate remedy for the violation of the victims' rights.
EFTA00013848.pdf
An automated email reply dated December 29, 2008, sent from an individual at USAFLS (likely the U.S. Attorney's Office) to Epstein's attorney Robert C. Josefsberg. The subject line references Jeffrey Epstein. The content indicates the sender is out of the office from December 22 until January 3.
EFTA00009937.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 6, 2020, within the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and the DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR). OPR sent a draft report regarding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein matter by the USAO in the Southern District of Florida (2006-2008) to the Acting US Attorney for SDNY. USANYS officials then discussed and approved sharing this report with their internal 'Epstein team' to evaluate its facts and potential implications for the pending case against Ghislaine Maxwell.
EFTA00009116.pdf
This document is a transcript of a deposition or interview with R. Alexander Acosta, conducted by the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) regarding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. The transcript covers discussions about the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), victim notification issues, internal Department of Justice communications, and interactions with Epstein's defense team, including Ken Starr and Jay Lefkowitz. Acosta defends his office's decisions, emphasizing the goal of securing sex offender registration and restitution, while addressing criticisms regarding the perceived leniency and lack of transparency with victims.
DOJ-OGR-00000121.tif
This document is an excerpt from a legal ruling or report, discussing the scope and binding nature of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) involving Epstein. It addresses the argument that the NPA might bind other judicial districts and concludes that it only binds the U.S. Attorney's office where it was signed, specifically stating it does not bind the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00021175.jpg
This document is the cover page of a November 2020 report by the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility. The report details an investigation into the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida's handling of the 2006-2008 federal criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, including its interactions with victims.
DOJ-OGR-00004700.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (affidavit) detailing the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It highlights a significant conflict of interest where Epstein paid the legal fees for James Eisenberg, who was representing T.M., a victim/witness in the case. The text also outlines the Summer 2007 negotiations resulting in the controversial non-prosecution agreement, where federal prosecution was deferred in favor of state charges to preserve federal remedies for victims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017627.jpg
This document is a page from a legal article (likely the Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology) submitted as evidence to the House Oversight Committee. It analyzes the timeline of the Epstein investigation between 2006 and 2007, detailing how the Palm Beach Police referred the case to the FBI, who then referred it to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. The text argues that under proper application of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), victims should have been notified and allowed to confer with prosecutors regarding the nonprosecution agreement eventually reached with Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013406.jpg
This document is a printout of a 'Main Justice' news article from March 22, 2011, detailing a legal motion filed by attorneys Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell. The attorneys allege that the U.S. Attorney's Office in Miami violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by secretly signing a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein in September 2007 while sending false letters to victims in 2008 claiming the investigation was still ongoing. The article includes a response from U.S. Attorney's Office Special Counsel Alicia Valle, who maintains that no federal charges were filed and declines further comment due to pending litigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013499.tif
This document details legal proceedings and events related to Jeffrey Epstein and Scott Rothstein. It describes Jane Doe's RICO and federal claims against Epstein, emphasizing the role of flight logs as evidence of interstate commerce to establish a 'federal nexus' for sexual assaults. It also mentions the affiant's involvement in the Rothstein Ponzi scheme as a victim and their role in reaching settlements in Epstein-related lawsuits.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity