This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the examination of a witness named Conrad. The questioning focuses on whether Conrad intentionally lied by omitting the fact he was a lawyer in order to be selected for a jury. Conrad admits to omitting the "pertinent fact" and the questioning explores his motivations, his state of mind during deliberations, and his interactions with U.S. Marshals who later served him a subpoena related to the matter.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| PAUL M. DAUGERDAS | Named party in case |
Mentioned in the case title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.
|
| Conrad | Witness |
The person being questioned throughout the transcript.
|
| Juror No. 2 | Juror / Forewoman |
Mentioned by Conrad as the forewoman to whom he handed a note about respondeat superior.
|
| Mr. Shanbrom | Witness |
Mentioned as having been on the witness stand during the trial.
|
| Lynn Swann |
Mentioned as someone the witness (Conrad) expressed admiration for during voir dire.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | government agency |
The plaintiff in the case title.
|
| THE COURT | government agency |
Referenced throughout as the judicial body presiding over the case, asking questions, and being the entity lied to.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, indicating they are the court reporters who transcribed the proceedings.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location of Conrad's house where marshals served him an order.
|
|
|
Mentioned by Conrad as his place of residence.
|
"When you were deliberating in this case, did you have it present in your mind that you had lied to get on to this jury?"Source
"Do you believe that you lied to the Court about being a lawyer?"Source
"I know I omitted that very pertinent fact."Source
"Do you recall telling them that in your view you had not lied, because no one asked you about whether or not you were a lawyer?"Source
"Is there anything you think it would be important for us to know about you in making a decision as to whether you should serve as a juror in this case?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (4,914 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document