This page from a legal document, filed on July 2, 2020, argues for a partial courtroom closure due to the public health risks of COVID-19. It cites statistics on the virus's spread in New Hampshire and nationally, and references the legal precedent from 'United States v. Smith' concerning a U.S. Marshal's policy implemented after September 11th.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Smith | Party in a legal case |
Mentioned in the legal citation 'United States v. Smith, 426 F.3d 567, 572-73 (2d Cir. 2005)'.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| N.H. Dep’t of Health and Human Servs. | Government agency |
Cited as a source for COVID-19 data in New Hampshire in a footnote.
|
| N.H. Pub. Radio | Media organization |
Cited as a source for an article on tracking COVID-19 in New Hampshire in a footnote.
|
| Real Clear Politics | Media organization |
Cited as a source for national COVID-19 data in a footnote.
|
| U.S. Marshal's | Government agency |
Mentioned in relation to a policy after September 11th requiring photo identification for unknown visitors to court.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the location where approximately 3,475 people are being monitored for COVID-19.
|
|
|
Mentioned as a party in the legal case 'United States v. Smith'.
|
Complete text extracted from the document (1,608 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document