This is a court transcript from a case dated August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion between two attorneys, Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey, and the judge. They are arranging the submission of a new, less-redacted version of flight logs (Exhibit 662-R), agreeing to mark it as '662-RR' for clarity, which will replace a previously offered version.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the legal proceeding, interacting with the attorneys about evidence.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney |
Attorney speaking to the court about introducing flight logs (Exhibit 662 and 662-R) as evidence.
|
| Ms. Comey | Attorney |
Attorney clarifying for the court that a new, less redacted version of Exhibit 662-R is being offered after conferrin...
|
| Mr. Rodgers | Witness |
Mentioned by Ms. Comey as someone who previously testified, in relation to an earlier version of Exhibit 662-R.
|
| Dubin | Subject of direct examination |
Mentioned in the header, indicating the current phase of the proceeding is the direct examination of this person.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied location of the court, as the court reporters are from the 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT'.
|
"So the Court knows, Exhibit 662 is the flight logs. We're going to offer 662-R."Source
"And after conferral with the defense, this new 662-R is a much more narrowly tailored redacted version; so it will replace the 662-R that was previously offered."Source
"I'm happy to call it and we can remark it 662-RR."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,291 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document