This document is a court transcript of a summation by Ms. Menninger, likely a defense attorney for Ghislaine. Menninger argues that the prosecution has failed to prove its case by highlighting inconsistencies in the testimony of a witness named Jane regarding Ghislaine's presence during Epstein's abuse. She also points out that the government broke its promise to present witnesses, specifically relatives of victims, who would corroborate claims of victims spending time and traveling with Ghislaine and Epstein.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Epstein |
Mentioned in relation to his house, office, and alleged abuse of Jane. Also mentioned as someone victims spent time a...
|
|
| Ghislaine | defendant |
Mentioned as the defendant. The speaker argues she did not encourage Jane to travel and questions her presence during...
|
| Jane | witness |
A witness who testified. Her testimony about Ghislaine's presence during abuse is being questioned by the speaker.
|
| Ms. Menninger | speaker |
The speaker delivering the summation, likely a defense attorney.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as a location where events related to the case took place.
|
|
|
Mentioned as a location where events related to the case took place.
|
"sometimes in the room when it happened"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,660 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document