Epstein's office
LocationRelationship Network
EFTA00023242.pdf
An email chain from July 12, 2019, in which a Bloomberg News reporter alerts USANYS officials to a specific detail in a news story regarding a 'super-secret safe' in Jeffrey Epstein's office on his private island. The email was then forwarded internally within the US Attorney's Office. The article quote suggests the safe contained 'much more than just money'.
EFTA00001834.pdf
A photograph showing the interior of a lavishly decorated office or library, widely identified as being inside Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan townhouse. The room features a distinctive ceiling painted to look like a blue sky with clouds, ornate wooden paneling, bookshelves, a blackboard with faint handwritten notes, and armchairs with a unique patterned fabric. An evidence tag 'EFTA00001834' is visible in the bottom right corner.
DOJ-OGR-00017130.jpg
This document is a court transcript of a summation by Ms. Menninger, likely a defense attorney. Menninger argues against the government's attempt to identify her client, Michelle, as a random person from an address book, asserting she is a specific individual who was friends with another woman, Emmy. She attacks the credibility of a key witness, Jane, accusing her of a pattern of fabricating accusations by picking names of people she knew from "Epstein's world."
DOJ-OGR-00016559.jpg
This document is a transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Espinosa, filed on August 10, 2022. The witness testifies about visitors to Jeffrey Epstein's office, stating that Ghislaine's presence decreased in the last two years of their employment. Espinosa identifies several female visitors, including Celina Midelfart, Shelly Lewis, Jane, and Gwendolyn Beck, describing them as 'young women' who appeared to be 'eighteen and over'.
DOJ-OGR-00013936.jpg
This page of court testimony features the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. Espinosa describes guests visiting Jeffrey Epstein's office, noting that doors were usually shut during visits. The questioning focuses on Celina Midelfart, confirming that Espinosa was tasked with sending her flowers, specifically orchids and bouquets. The page ends with the prosecution asking if Espinosa perceived a romantic relationship between Epstein and Midelfart, which draws an objection from defense attorney Ms. Pomerantz that is overruled by the court.
DOJ-OGR-00013935.jpg
This document is a page from the direct examination transcript of a witness named Espinosa, filed on August 10, 2022. The witness testifies about visitors to Jeffrey Epstein's office, stating that female visitors appeared to be 'eighteen and over.' Espinosa names Celina Midelfart, Shelly Lewis, Jane, and Gwendolyn Beck as women they recall visiting Epstein's office.
DOJ-OGR-00013884.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (implied by context and LCGVMAX1 code). Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues that photographs sent by a witness ('Jane') to Ms. Espinosa, an employee who worked in Epstein's office daily, should be admitted as evidence to show 'Jane' maintained relationships with Epstein's circle after claiming to flee. Prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz counters that the evidence is irrelevant because the witness already acknowledged maintaining such relationships during direct examination.
DOJ-OGR-00017434.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski, filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony describes the communication process for scheduling flights in the 1990s, which involved receiving a message on a beeper from Epstein's office and then calling back to speak with a secretary or assistant to make the arrangements. The witness confirms this procedure and also mentions occasionally speaking with someone named Ghislaine.
DOJ-OGR-00014489.jpg
This document is a court transcript of a summation by Ms. Menninger, likely a defense attorney for Ghislaine. Menninger argues that the prosecution has failed to prove its case by highlighting inconsistencies in the testimony of a witness named Jane regarding Ghislaine's presence during Epstein's abuse. She also points out that the government broke its promise to present witnesses, specifically relatives of victims, who would corroborate claims of victims spending time and traveling with Ghislaine and Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00014446.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (summation by Ms. Moe) filed in August 2022. It details evidence corroborating the testimony of a witness named Carolyn, specifically linking her to Epstein and Maxwell through FedEx invoices from 2002 and phone messages left at the Palm Beach house in 2004. The prosecutor argues that Maxwell's name on the FedEx invoices proves her involvement in the operation.
DOJ-OGR-00014445.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the summation by Ms. Moe. The text details allegations of sexual abuse involving Epstein and Maxwell against minors named Jane, Annie, Virginia Roberts, and Carolyn, supported by evidence such as flight logs and FedEx records.
DOJ-OGR-00014515.jpg
This document is a legal summation describing the testimony of Ms. Menninger regarding two encounters with Epstein in New York. The first was a meeting with her sister in his office to discuss college applications, and the second was at a movie theater where he held her hand, an act she later reported to the Victims Compensation Fund as sexual abuse. The testimony also asserts that Ghislaine Maxwell was not present or involved in these events.
DOJ-OGR-00014511.jpg
This document is a page from a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, likely in a trial related to Epstein. The speaker challenges a witness's testimony about Epstein's New York house by pointing out she failed to recall a major 1994 renovation mentioned by Larry Visoski. The speaker also argues that no government staff corroborated the witness's story or confirmed anything unusual, and introduces testimony from Cim Espinosa, who worked for Epstein and booked guests like "Jane" and her mother into his apartments.
DOJ-OGR-00014509.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. Menninger argues against the government's claim that a woman named Michelle is a random person, citing testimony from witnesses Jane and Michelle herself to establish that she is a specific individual who was friends with another person named Emmy. The summation aims to prove that Jane is not fabricating connections but identifying real people she encountered in 'Epstein's world'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025172.jpg
An email chain from January 2017 between Jeffrey Epstein and David Grosof discussing scientific topics such as probability, gravity, and biological signal encryption. Epstein mentions he is having dinner with 'Jin Watson' (likely James Watson), and Grosof references past meetings with Watson, Gunther Stent, Francis Crick, and Jonathan Victor. The document originates from a House Oversight investigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity