DOJ-OGR-00010070.jpg

401 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
1
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 401 KB
Summary

This document is a transcript of legal testimony where an individual named Edelstein is questioned about their knowledge of a Westlaw report concerning Juror No. 1, Catherine M. Conrad. The questioning establishes a timeline, indicating Edelstein reviewed the report after receiving a letter on June 20 but before a court conference on July 15 involving Theresa Trzaskoma. The focus is on whether Edelstein personally noticed similarities between the juror and information in the report, such as her address and her father's name.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Edelstein Witness/Deponent
The person being questioned throughout the transcript.
Catherine M. Conrad Juror No. 1 / suspended attorney
The subject of a Westlaw report, identified as Juror No. 1 and a suspended attorney.
Theresa Trzaskoma
Mentioned as a participant in a court conference on July 15.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Westlaw company
Source of a report about Catherine M. Conrad.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
The court reporting agency that produced the transcript.

Timeline (3 events)

A jury verdict was received, after which Edelstein learned about the Westlaw report.
A letter written in May was received on June 20.
A court conference occurred on July 15.
court

Relationships (1)

Catherine M. Conrad personal Catherine M. Conrad's father
The questioning mentions a personal injury report with the 'same name for her father'.

Key Quotes (1)

"Jesus, I think this is the one,"
Source
— unnamed person in Edelstein's firm (Quoted from an email sent after reviewing a Westlaw report, indicating a belief that Juror No. 1 was Catherine M. Conrad, the suspended attorney.)
DOJ-OGR-00010070.jpg
Quote #1

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,212 characters)

Case 2:20-cr-00033-B9 AEN Document 646-22 Filed 02/22/22 Page 330 of 330
A-5787
C2GFDAU3
330
Edelstein
1 had subsequently looked a Westlaw report that led her to
2 send an e-mail to somebody else in your firm saying, "Jesus, I
3 think this is the one," meaning Juror No. 1 was the Catherine
4 M. Conrad the suspended attorney? Did she tell that you?
5 A. No.
6 Q. Did you learn of the Westlaw report during the conversation
7 with her?
8 A. No.
9 Q. At what point did you learn about the Westlaw report
10 conversation?
11 A. I learned about the Westlaw report --
12 Q. I'm sorry the report?
13 A. After we received the letter and jury verdict.
14 Q. Before the July --
15 A. By the letter I mean the letter that was written in May and
16 received on June 20.
17 Q. Did you review the Westlaw report before Theresa Trzaskoma
18 participated in the court conference on July 15?
19 A. Yes.
20 Q. Did you yourself notice the similarities between the
21 address for Catherine M. Conrad, Juror No. 1, the existence of
22 a personal injury report, same name for her father? Did you
23 note those things?
24 A. When --
25 Q. Did you note those things?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010070

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document