Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
A letter written in May was received on June 20.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Edelstein | person | 115 | View Entity |
Source Documents (2)
DOJ-OGR-00010070.jpg
This document is a transcript of legal testimony where an individual named Edelstein is questioned about their knowledge of a Westlaw report concerning Juror No. 1, Catherine M. Conrad. The questioning establishes a timeline, indicating Edelstein reviewed the report after receiving a letter on June 20 but before a court conference on July 15 involving Theresa Trzaskoma. The focus is on whether Edelstein personally noticed similarities between the juror and information in the report, such as her address and her father's name.
DOJ-OGR-00009391.jpg
This document is a legal transcript from a deposition where the witness, Edelstein, is questioned about the discovery of information regarding Juror No. 1, Catherine M. Conrad. The questioning focuses on the timeline of when Edelstein's side learned from a Westlaw report that the juror was a suspended attorney, referencing an email sent within the firm, a letter received on June 20, and a court conference on July 15 involving Theresa Trzaskoma.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
A witness named Edelstein is questioned about a decision made with Susan Brune to omit information from a legal brief.
Date unknown
Edelstein and Susan Brune decided to omit information about a juror note and a suspended lawyer from a legal brief they were preparing.
Date unknown
The writing of a legal brief by Edelstein and Ms. Brune.
Date unknown
A discussion between Edelstein and Ms. Brune about what information to include or omit in a legal brief concerning Catherine Conrad.
Date unknown
A witness, Edelstein, is questioned by an attorney about their knowledge of Catherine Conrad's professional status.
Date unknown
A discussion about whether computer research on Ms. Conrad could have been performed on May 12th.
0012-05-01
Theresa Trzaskoma told the witness (Edelstein) that there was a suspended lawyer named Catherine Conrad.
Date unknown
A question-and-answer session where a witness named Edelstein is being questioned about the intent and content of a legal brief.
Date unknown
Edelstein and Ms. Brune specifically decided what information to include or exclude from a legal brief.
Date unknown
Edelstein is questioned about his knowledge of Juror No. 1's identity and potential connection to a suspended attorney named Catherine M. Conrad.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event