DOJ-OGR-00010005.jpg
431 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
431 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on February 22, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Brune. The questioning focuses on whether she understood certain information about a potential juror to be significant, particularly to a Judge Pauley. The transcript includes objections from attorneys Mr. Gair and Mr. Schectman, and rulings from the presiding judge.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brune | Witness |
A witness, referred to as Ms. Brune, undergoing direct examination.
|
| MR. GAIR | Attorney |
An attorney who makes an objection during the testimony.
|
| Judge Pauley | Judge |
A judge mentioned in the questioning, to whom certain information would be significant.
|
| MR. SCHECTMAN | Attorney |
An attorney who addresses the judge regarding the interruption of the witness's answer.
|
| Honor | Judge |
A title used to address the presiding judge ('your Honor').
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding her understanding of 'significant information' related to a potential juror and Judge Pauley.
Courtroom (implied)
Relationships (3)
Mr. Gair addresses the court as 'your Honor' while making a legal objection.
Mr. Schectman addresses the judge directly to comment on the proceedings.
The document shows a formal question-and-answer session as part of a legal examination.
Key Quotes (4)
"Objection, asked and answered, your Honor."Source
— MR. GAIR
(Making a legal objection to a question posed to the witness.)
DOJ-OGR-00010005.jpg
Quote #1
"If it was the same person it was significant information, that's correct."Source
— Brune
(Answering a question about her understanding of the significance of certain information.)
DOJ-OGR-00010005.jpg
Quote #2
"I believe that it was certainly going to be significant to Judge Pauley if it was the same person."Source
— Brune
(Responding to a question about whether information would be significant to Judge Pauley.)
DOJ-OGR-00010005.jpg
Quote #3
"Judge, I'm okay with some stopping, but really not in the middle of answers."Source
— MR. SCHECTMAN
(Addressing the judge to object to the questioner interrupting the witness.)
DOJ-OGR-00010005.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,382 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00338-AEN Document 646-22 Filed 02/22/22 Page 730 of 3030
A-5722
A-5722
C2GFDAU1
265
Brune - direct
1 Q. And you didn't -- that is actually not answering the
2 question I asked.
3 A. I'm sorry. Do it again and I'll try to get it.
4 Q. You understood this was significant information
5 potentially, yes?
6 MR. GAIR: Objection, asked and answered, your Honor.
7 THE COURT: Overruled.
8 A. If it was the same person it was significant information,
9 that's correct.
10 Q. And you didn't need anyone to explain to you that it was
11 potentially significant information?
12 A. No.
13 Q. And that it would be significant to Judge Pauley, correct?
14 A. I believe that it was certainly going to be significant to
15 Judge Pauley if it was the same person.
16 Q. And one way you find out if it's the same person is to ask
17 Judge Pauley to ask the potential juror, correct?
18 A. No. If the person has sworn under oath that her highest
19 level of education is college and has disclaimed any contact
20 with any disciplinary authority, I don't think that was the
21 reasonable course at all. What happened --
22 Q. Let me stop you there, Ms. Brune. Are you saying --
23 MR. SCHECTMAN: Judge, I'm okay with some stopping,
24 but really not in the middle of answers.
25 THE COURT: Right. Did you complete your answer,
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
265
Brune - direct
1 Q. And you didn't -- that is actually not answering the
2 question I asked.
3 A. I'm sorry. Do it again and I'll try to get it.
4 Q. You understood this was significant information
5 potentially, yes?
6 MR. GAIR: Objection, asked and answered, your Honor.
7 THE COURT: Overruled.
8 A. If it was the same person it was significant information,
9 that's correct.
10 Q. And you didn't need anyone to explain to you that it was
11 potentially significant information?
12 A. No.
13 Q. And that it would be significant to Judge Pauley, correct?
14 A. I believe that it was certainly going to be significant to
15 Judge Pauley if it was the same person.
16 Q. And one way you find out if it's the same person is to ask
17 Judge Pauley to ask the potential juror, correct?
18 A. No. If the person has sworn under oath that her highest
19 level of education is college and has disclaimed any contact
20 with any disciplinary authority, I don't think that was the
21 reasonable course at all. What happened --
22 Q. Let me stop you there, Ms. Brune. Are you saying --
23 MR. SCHECTMAN: Judge, I'm okay with some stopping,
24 but really not in the middle of answers.
25 THE COURT: Right. Did you complete your answer,
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010005
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document