DOJ-OGR-00010578.jpg

626 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 626 KB
Summary

This legal document, part of a court filing, argues against leniency for the defendant, Maxwell, by highlighting her privileged background and a significant pattern of dishonesty. It provides two key examples of her dishonest conduct: lying under oath in a 2016 civil deposition related to a lawsuit by Virginia Roberts, and misleading Pretrial Services about her finances and home ownership in New Hampshire upon her arrest.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Maxwell Defendant
The subject of the document, described as having a privileged life and a pattern of dishonest conduct.
Virginia Roberts Plaintiff
Brought a lawsuit against the defendant, during which the defendant allegedly lied under oath.
Annie Farmer
A person to whom the defendant denied giving a massage during a civil deposition.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Pretrial Services Government agency
Interviewed the defendant upon her arrest, to whom she allegedly lied about her home ownership and finances.
Court Government agency
Mentioned as the body that denied the defendant's application for bail and remarked on her "lack of candor".

Timeline (3 events)

2016
The defendant testified under oath in a civil deposition related to a lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts and allegedly lied repeatedly.
Upon her arrest, the defendant was interviewed by Pretrial Services and allegedly lied about her home ownership and finances.
The Court denied the defendant's renewed application for bail.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location of a home owned by the defendant, which she misrepresented as being owned by a corporation.

Relationships (2)

Maxwell Adversarial (legal) Virginia Roberts
Maxwell was the defendant in a lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts.
Maxwell Unspecified Annie Farmer
Maxwell denied giving Annie Farmer a massage during testimony, implying a prior interaction that was under dispute.

Key Quotes (2)

"just able to stay there."
Source
— Maxwell (A statement made to Pretrial Services regarding her home in New Hampshire, which the document claims was a lie.)
DOJ-OGR-00010578.jpg
Quote #1
"lack of candor"
Source
— The Court (A remark made by the Court regarding the defendant's statements about her finances in an Order denying bail.)
DOJ-OGR-00010578.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,764 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 670 Filed 06/22/22 Page 43 of 55
2. History and Characteristics of the Defendant
The history and characteristics of the defendant also weigh in favor of a Guidelines sentence.
Although many defendants come before sentencing courts with compelling mitigating factors from difficult upbringings, Maxwell is not among them. She has enjoyed a remarkable life of privilege, having lived in luxury and moved in social circles among the famous and powerful. And while the defendant may have had a marginally less positive experience than other exceptionally wealthy children, it is difficult to see how stern conversation at the family dinner table is an excuse for participating in a child exploitation scheme.
Moreover, the record at sentencing makes clear that the defendant has engaged in a significant pattern of dishonest conduct, which speaks volumes about her character. The defendant’s record includes the following:
- In 2016, the defendant testified under oath in a civil deposition in connection with a lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts and lied repeatedly during her testimony. For example, she denied, among other things, having given Annie Farmer a massage. (PSR ¶ 75-76). As the evidence at trial established, that was a lie.
- Upon her arrest, the defendant was interviewed by Pretrial Services, and told them that the home she owned in New Hampshire was owned by a corporation, and that she was “just able to stay there.” (PSR ¶ 149). That was a lie, as were her statements to Pretrial Services about her finances. In an Order denying the defendant’s renewed application for bail, the Court remarked on the defendant’s “lack of candor” about her finances and concluded that the defendant had
41
DOJ-OGR-00010578

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document