HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016560.jpg

2.24 MB

Extraction Summary

9
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Code enforcement board meeting minutes
File Size: 2.24 MB
Summary

This document is page 7 of the Palm Beach Code Enforcement Board Meeting Minutes from July 17, 2008. It details the conclusion of a previous case regarding leaf blowers resulting in fines, and the beginning of Case # 08-2520 against Richard Lynn of 165 Brazilian Ave regarding a dangerous dog named 'Duke'. Board member Mr. Ochstein recused himself from the Lynn case due to a family business connection, and Sgt. Krauel presented evidence of dog attacks spanning four years.

People (9)

Name Role Context
Mr. Ochstein Board Member
Made motion on previous case; recused himself from Richard Lynn case due to conflict of interest.
Ms. Van Buren Board Member
Seconded motion on previous case.
Mr. Weymer Witness/Official
Explained testing method for leaf blowers in previous case.
Richard Lynn Violator/Respondent
Subject of Case # 08-2520 regarding dangerous dog violations (Dr. Lynn).
Mr. Hoffman Board Member/Official
Questioned procedural jurisdiction regarding the dangerous dog case.
Mr. Vanneck Board Member
Substituted as voting member after Ochstein recusal.
Sgt. Curtis Krauel Police Sergeant
Presented facts and photos regarding the dangerous dog case.
Mr. Randolph Official
Explained legal authority and jurisdiction differences between Town Council and Code Enforcement Board.
Duke Animal
The dog owned by Richard Lynn accused of attacks.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Code Enforcement Board
The body conducting the meeting.
Town of Palm Beach
Municipality whose codes are being enforced.
Town Council
Previously ordered the dog removed/euthanized.
Police Department
Originally ordered the dog removed.

Timeline (2 events)

2004-03-17 to 2008-05-11
Documented attacks by the dog 'Duke'
Palm Beach, FL
2008-07-17
Code Enforcement Board Meeting
Palm Beach, FL

Locations (1)

Location Context
Address associated with Case # 08-2520 and Richard Lynn.

Relationships (2)

Mr. Ochstein Conflict of Interest Richard Lynn
Ochstein recused himself because a relative has a business relationship with Dr. Lynn.
Richard Lynn Owner/Pet Duke
Lynn is the respondent for the case regarding the dog Duke.

Key Quotes (3)

"Mr. Ochstein recused himself, stating that he has a relative who has a business relationship with Dr. Lynn"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016560.jpg
Quote #1
"Dr. Lynn has refused to comply with the order of the Town Council"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016560.jpg
Quote #2
"Sgt. Krauel presented the facts of each of the documented cases involving attacks by Duke from March 17, 2004 until May 11, 2008."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016560.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,747 characters)

Code Enforcement Board Meeting Minutes 07/17/08
the truck he was out with had 2 other leaf blowers on the truck that he could identify as being over 65dBA but he only tested the one they were using and wrote a violation for that one. Ms. Van Buren asked about the testing method and Mr. Weymer explained how it was done.
MOTION BY MR. OCHSTEIN TO FIND THE VIOLATOR IN NON-COMPLIANCE, ASSESS ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $150.00 AND ORDER HIM TO PAY THE $125.00 FINE
SECONDED BY MS. VAN BUREN
MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY
K. Case # 08-2520, 165 Brazilian Ave., Richard Lynn
Violation of Chapter 10, Section 10-45 (i) of the Town of Palm Beach Code of Ordinances, if any dog attacks and causes severe injury or death to any human or domestic animal more than once, the owner shall be required to have said dog removed from the Town or humanely euthanized at his/her sole expense and violation of Chapter 10, Section 10-6 of the Code which prohibits animals from creating nuisances which are detrimental to the public safety and welfare.
(Mr. Ochstein recused himself, stating that he has a relative who has a business relationship with Dr. Lynn and Mr. Hoffman advised Mr. Vanneck would be a voting member in this case)
Sgt. Curtis Krauel said this case was brought to Code Enforcement through a culmination of events spanning back over a period of 4 years. Sgt. Krauel explained Section 10-6 of the Code and said he was going to be showing some graphic photographs. Sgt. Krauel presented the facts of each of the documented cases involving attacks by Duke from March 17, 2004 until May 11, 2008.
Mr. Hoffman questioned how the Code Enforcement Board came into this procedure since the Town Council had already said Duke is a dangerous dog. Mr. Randolph explained that Town Council does not have the authority to fine. Originally, the police department did not issue a code enforcement board citation but ordered the dog be removed from the Town or humanely euthanized which was appealed to Town Council. Town Council denied the appeal. Since that time, Dr. Lynn has refused to comply with the order of the Town Council so a citation was issued by Code Enforcement to bring the matter before the Board to determine whether there should be a finding of violation and at a later time, whether a fine should be imposed. Mr. Randolph said it was now the jurisdiction of the Code Enforcement Board and not the Town Council. Mr. Hoffman questioned whether or not the Board had to determine if the dog was going to be euthanized or removed from the Town and Mr. Randolph explained that this was not the Board’s determination. The Board was only to determine whether or not there had been a violation of the Town Code.
7
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016560

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document