Prince Andrew, the Duke of York
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Subjects of media speculation |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Dr. Lynn
|
Owner pet |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Richard Lynn
|
Owner pet |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Sophie Shevardnadze
|
Friend |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert Olney
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. SCAROLA
|
Correspondents |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Direct communication |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Direct communication |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Confidant co conspirator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Gary Bloxsome
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
SDNY Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
Investigator subject |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-08 | N/A | Public statement issued by Prince Andrew's legal team (referenced in emails) | UK/Media | View |
| 2011-03-04 | N/A | Email exchange regarding allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell and 'The Duke's' request to be leg... | View | |
| 2008-07-18 | N/A | Deadline for compliance | The Town | View |
| 2008-06-20 | N/A | Dog incident reported by Laura Klein | The Town | View |
| 2008-06-20 | N/A | Incident where dog attempted to attack Laura Klein | The Town | View |
| 2008-05-11 | N/A | Attack by dog 'Duke' | N/A (Implied Brazilian Ave) | View |
| 2008-05-11 | N/A | Last attack by Duke | N/A | View |
| 2004-03-17 | N/A | Documented attacks by the dog 'Duke' | Palm Beach, FL | View |
| 2004-03-17 | N/A | Series of dog attacks by 'Duke' | Palm Beach, FL | View |
| 2004-03-17 | N/A | Documented cases involving attacks by the dog 'Duke' | Palm Beach, FL | View |
EFTA00023791.pdf
This document contains a chain of emails between Gary Bloxsome (representing Prince Andrew, the Duke of York) and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) in July 2020. The correspondence details tense negotiations regarding a request for Prince Andrew to sit for a voluntary interview concerning the Epstein investigation. Key points of contention include the confidentiality of the proceedings, allegations of media leaks by US officials (specifically Geoffrey Berman and Audrey Strauss), and the legal mechanisms of the interview (voluntary vs. compelled via MLAT). The SDNY proposes a two-week confidential negotiation period to resolve the impasse.
DOJ-OGR-00017463.jpg
This document is a transcript of a cross-examination of a witness named Visoski regarding flights on Epstein's planes. The witness admits to not always meeting passengers and being unable to confirm if a specific person named 'Jane' was on certain flights. The questioning concludes with the witness confirming that Prince Andrew, the Duke of York, did fly on Epstein's planes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022086.jpg
This document consists of pages 116 and 117 from the book 'Filthy Rich', stamped as House Oversight evidence. It details the relationship between Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, alleging Maxwell transitioned from girlfriend to household manager and procurer of underage women, specifically mentioning Virginia Roberts (Jane Doe 102). The text also highlights the case of Nadia Bjorlin, a 13-year-old singer at Interlochen Arts Center, whom Epstein allegedly targeted because she was vulnerable following her father's death.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012033.jpg
This document, marked as Exhibit R, details allegations from a court filing stating that Jeffrey Epstein forced a minor, Jane Doe #3, to have sexual relations with Alan Dershowitz and Prince Andrew. It includes denials from Dershowitz, who threatens legal action against the accuser's lawyers, and a denial from Buckingham Palace regarding Prince Andrew's involvement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016625.jpg
This page contains minutes from a Code Enforcement Board meeting dated July 17, 2008, detailing a legal dispute between 'The Town' (likely Palm Beach) and Dr. Lynn regarding his dog, Duke. The Town, represented by Mr. Randolph and Sgt. Krauel, seeks to have the dog removed or euthanized following a June 20th incident involving Laura Klein, while Dr. Lynn's attorney, Mr. Merola, argues regarding jurisdictional issues and compliance with ordinances 10-45 and 10-6. The document references parallel litigation in Circuit Court before Judge Hoy.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016624.jpg
Meeting minutes from the Palm Beach Code Enforcement Board dated July 17, 2008. Neighbors testify regarding safety concerns posed by 'Duke,' a dog owned by Dr. Lynn (likely Dr. Peter Lynn), citing attacks on joggers and neighbors. Dr. Lynn's attorney, James Merola, argues procedural points regarding the 'dangerous dog' classification, noting compliance with County requirements and contesting the Town's order to remove or euthanize the animal.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016622.jpg
This document contains minutes from a Code Enforcement Board meeting on July 17, 2008. It details the end of a hearing regarding a leaf blower violation and the beginning of Case # 08-2520 against Dr. Richard Lynn of 165 Brazilian Ave regarding his dog, Duke, who had a history of attacks spanning four years. Board member Mr. Ochstein recused himself from the Lynn case due to a relative's business relationship with Dr. Lynn.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016583.jpg
This document contains the minutes from a Code Enforcement Board meeting on July 17, 2008, detailing a legal dispute between the Town (likely Palm Beach) and Dr. Lynn regarding his dog, Duke. The Town sought the removal or euthanasia of the dog following a June 20th incident involving Laura Klein, while Dr. Lynn's attorney, Mr. Merola, argued jurisdictional issues and compliance. Sgt. Krauel provided police testimony regarding the timeline of notices and the Town's ability to enforce stricter ordinances than the state or county.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016582.jpg
This document is page 9 of the Palm Beach Code Enforcement Board Meeting Minutes from July 17, 2008. It details testimony from neighbors and legal representatives regarding a dangerous dog named 'Duke' owned by Dr. Lynn, including accounts of attacks on joggers and neighbors. The text outlines the legal timeline of the dog's classification as 'dangerous,' police correspondence regarding euthanasia, and the owner's compliance with bond requirements.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016581.jpg
This document is a page from the Code Enforcement Board Meeting Minutes dated July 17, 2008 (likely Palm Beach, FL, given the street names and 'House Oversight' stamp). It details proceedings regarding a dog named 'Duke,' owned by Dr. Lynn, which was classified as 'dangerous' following an attack on another dog owned by neighbor Vivian Dorris on Brazilian Ave. The Town recommended that the dog be removed or euthanized by July 18, 2008, or face a daily fine of $250.00.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016580.jpg
Minutes from a 2008 Palm Beach Code Enforcement Board meeting. The document details a case against Richard Lynn of 165 Brazilian Ave regarding his dog, Duke, which had been involved in multiple attacks over four years. Board member Mr. Ochstein recused himself due to a family business connection with Lynn, and the board discussed the jurisdictional nuance between the Town Council's previous removal order and the Board's authority to issue fines.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016562.jpg
This document is page 9 of the minutes for a Code Enforcement Board meeting in Palm Beach dated July 17, 2008. Witnesses Bobby Goodnough and Laura Klein testify about dangerous incidents involving a dog named Duke owned by Dr. Lynn, citing fear for the neighborhood's safety. Dr. Lynn's attorney, James Merola, addresses the legal proceedings, noting previous hearings and letters from the police department regarding the dog's classification as dangerous and potential euthanasia.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016561.jpg
This document is page 8 of the minutes from a Code Enforcement Board meeting held on July 17, 2008. The primary topic is a dangerous dog case involving 'Duke,' owned by Dr. Lynn, which had attacked other dogs on Brazilian Ave. The board discussed imposing fines and requiring the removal or euthanasia of the dog, while neighbors provided testimony regarding the attacks and safety concerns.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016560.jpg
This document is page 7 of the Palm Beach Code Enforcement Board Meeting Minutes from July 17, 2008. It details the conclusion of a previous case regarding leaf blowers resulting in fines, and the beginning of Case # 08-2520 against Richard Lynn of 165 Brazilian Ave regarding a dangerous dog named 'Duke'. Board member Mr. Ochstein recused himself from the Lynn case due to a family business connection, and Sgt. Krauel presented evidence of dog attacks spanning four years.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023056.jpg
This email chain from March 4, 2011, tracks a reaction to an upcoming 'Mail on Sunday' story involving Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Prince Andrew ('The Duke'). The chain begins with a journalist contacting lawyer Brett Jaffe, which is forwarded through Mark Cohen to Maxwell, then to Epstein, and finally to The Duke. Epstein dismisses the allegations as 'salcisous' (salacious) and jokes to The Duke that the only person Maxwell hasn't slept with is Elvis, while The Duke expresses confusion and asks how Epstein plans to respond.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023038.jpg
This document is an email chain from March 4, 2011, involving Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Mark Cohen, and 'The Duke' (widely believed to be Prince Andrew). The chain begins with a legal/media inquiry regarding Maxwell, which Mark Cohen forwards to Maxwell seeking direction. The chain is forwarded to Epstein, then to 'The Duke,' who responds to Maxwell with significant distress, denying knowledge or involvement ('This has NOTHING to do with me'). Maxwell then loops this response back to Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023035.jpg
An email chain from March 4, 2011, primarily between Jeffrey Epstein and 'The Duke' (Prince Andrew). The discussion concerns allegations surfacing against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Duke explicitly demands that any legal response clarify he is not involved and knows nothing about the allegations, stating he 'can't take any more of this.' Epstein dismisses the allegations as 'salacious and ridiculous,' joking that the only person Maxwell didn't have sex with was Elvis.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023032.jpg
This document is an email chain from March 4, 2011, initiated by a media inquiry from the Mail on Sunday regarding an upcoming story about Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, and Prince Andrew. The inquiry was forwarded up a chain: from Brett Jaffe to Mark Cohen, to Ghislaine Maxwell, to Jeffrey Epstein, and finally to 'The Duke' (Prince Andrew). The Duke replies to Epstein expressing confusion ('I don't know any of this') and asking how Epstein intends to respond.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015584.jpg
This document is an email from Mary E. Pirrotta to Lindsay Isaac (at Turner) dated January 22, 2015. It provides requested legal documents, specifically a complaint for Case No. CACE 15-000072 (Edwards vs. Dershowitz) and a letter from Mr. Scarola addressed to The Duke of York. The document bears Bates stamps BE-000029 and HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015584.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013721.jpg
This document is page 221 of a scientific text, stamped with a House Oversight Bates number (013721), likely part of an investigation file. The text discusses advanced neuroscience topics, specifically the application of Lyapounov exponents to brain data, enzyme kinetics, and EEG recordings in the context of chaos theory versus randomness. While Jeffrey Epstein is not named on this specific page, the frequent citation of 'Mandell' (likely Arnold Mandell) suggests a connection to Epstein's funding of scientific research, as Mandell was a known associate in Epstein's scientific circles.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030458.jpg
This document is an email chain from March 7, 2011, detailing an attempt by the BBC's Today programme to secure an interview with Jeffrey Epstein regarding stories circulating about him and Prince Andrew. The request was sent by Kirsty Mackenzie to Epstein's attorney, Jack Goldberger, then forwarded by Epstein to Peter Mandelson, who replied offering to discuss it over the phone.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030456.jpg
This document is an email chain from March 7, 2011, detailing an interview request from Kirsty Mackenzie of the BBC's 'Today' programme to Jeffrey Epstein. The request, sent via Epstein's attorney Jack Goldberger, was to address 'circulating stories' about Epstein and Prince Andrew. Epstein forwarded the request to Peter Mandelson, who replied tersely, 'No !!'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030454.jpg
This document is an email from Jack Goldberger to Jeffrey Epstein, dated March 7, 2011, forwarding an interview request from Kirsty Mackenzie, an editor at the BBC's 'Today' programme. Mackenzie sought the interview to allow Epstein to respond to 'stories which are circulating, however inaccurately, about both him and Prince Andrew, the Duke of York'. The email pitches the 'Today' programme as a prestigious platform, listing many high-profile past guests.
N/A
Referenced as an attachment in the email.
Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
Asking 'What? I don't know any of this. How are you responding?'
Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
Discussing 'g lawyers' and making a comment about Elvis.
Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
Demanding that legal letters state he is not involved and knows nothing.
Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
Discussing the press inquiry, calling it 'salcisous' and making a joke about Elvis.
Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
Asking 'What? I don't know any of this. How are you responding?'
Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
What? I don't know any of this. How are you responding?
Fw: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
Hey there! What's all this? I don't know anything about this! You must SAY so please. This has NOTHING to do with me. I can't take any more of this.
Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
Forwarding the chain from Ghislaine Maxwell.
Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
Forwarding previous chain.
Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
Forwarding the chain to The Duke.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity