DOJ-OGR-00018553.jpg
520 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
520 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion about admitting evidence. An attorney, Ms. Moe, successfully argues for admitting Government Exhibit 925 under seal because it contains identifying information of third parties, while a redacted version, Exhibit 925-R, is admitted as a public exhibit for the jury to review. The transcript also briefly mentions that FBI personnel were responsible for placing labels on binders related to the case.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maguire | Witness |
Mentioned in the header as being under 'direct' examination.
|
| MS. MOE | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, addressing the court and discussing government exhibits.
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, stating 'No objection' to the admission of exhibits.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, ruling on the admission of evidence and addressing the attorneys. Referred to as 'your Hon...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| FBI | government agency |
Mentioned as 'the FBI personnel labeling them' in response to a question about Post-Its on binders.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion during a trial regarding the admission of Government Exhibits 925 and 925-R into evidence. Exhibit 925 was admitted under seal due to third-party identifying information, while its redacted version, 925-R, was admitted as a public exhibit to be shown to the jury.
Courtroom (implied)
Relationships (3)
Ms. Moe, an attorney, addresses the judge as 'your Honor' and requests rulings on evidence.
Mr. Everdell, an attorney, addresses the court regarding an objection.
Both are attorneys participating in the same court proceeding, likely representing opposing sides.
Key Quotes (3)
"That was by the FBI personnel labeling them."Source
— A. (likely Maguire)
(In response to the question 'How did those Post-Its get on the binders?')
DOJ-OGR-00018553.jpg
Quote #1
"Your Honor, with respect to the labels, there is identifying information for third parties."Source
— MS. MOE
(Explaining to the Court the basis for placing Government Exhibit 925 under seal.)
DOJ-OGR-00018553.jpg
Quote #2
"925-R is a redacted version of 925, and that is admitted as a public exhibit."Source
— THE COURT
(Clarifying the status of the two exhibits being entered into evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00018553.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,277 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 216 of 261
LC6VMAX6
Maguire - direct
1377
LC6VMAX6
Maguire - direct
1377
1 them?
2 A. No, they were not.
3 Q. How did those Post-Its get on the binders?
4 A. That was by the FBI personnel labeling them.
5 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.
6 Your Honor, the government would offer Government
7 Exhibits 925 and 925-R. 925-R is a public exhibit, and
8 Government Exhibit 925 under seal.
9 MR. EVERDELL: No objection.
10 THE COURT: All right. Thank you.
11 925 is admitted -- and what is the basis for seal?
12 MS. MOE: Your Honor, with respect to the labels,
13 there is identifying information for third parties.
14 THE COURT: Okay. So 925 is admitted under seal.
15 925-R is a redacted version of 925, and that is admitted as a
16 public exhibit.
17 (Government's Exhibits 925, 925-R received in
18 evidence)
19 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.
20 Could we now publish Government Exhibit 925-R as a
21 public exhibit, and ask the jurors to turn in their binders to
22 what's in under seal as Government Exhibit 925.
23 THE COURT: Right. You may.
24 So you can publish 925-R, and the jurors may look --
25 I'm sorry, 925-R you may publish. And the jurors may open
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018553
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document