This legal document argues that Juror 50 intentionally provided false answers during jury selection. It highlights contradictions in his testimony regarding whether his abuser (his stepbrother) was a family member and contrasts his claim of not speaking about the abuse with his decisions to speak to international media and post on social media. The document portrays the juror's explanations as unbelievable and rehearsed, suggesting a deliberate attempt to mislead the Court.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror 50 | Juror |
The subject of the document, accused of providing false and contradictory answers during jury selection regarding his...
|
| BOBBI C. STERNHEIM | Attorney |
Mentioned in the header under 'LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM'.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM | law firm |
Appears in the header of the document.
|
| The Court | government agency |
Mentioned as the body to which Juror 50 gave his responses and testimony.
|
| British tabloids | media |
Mentioned as one of the international media outlets Juror 50 spoke to about his abuse.
|
"no"Source
"never considered them part of my family even when they lived with us for a few years."Source
"a family member, who is no longer part of the family."Source
"flew threw"Source
"didn’t even consider"Source
"Yes (friend or family member) because his stepbrother was, in fact, a family member."Source
"[doesn’t] tell very many people"Source
"I didn’t lie in order to get on this jury and then go to the press and tell them about my abuse. It just … it’s a little illogical thinking about it, like if I lied deliberately I wouldn’t have told a soul."Source
"No, I did not."Source
"a little article about a juror giving their experience wouldn’t be record-breaking or really in the news at all."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,286 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document