This legal document is a filing from the defense in the case against Epstein, arguing that their ability to challenge a witness named Jane's testimony was hampered. The defense claims that unavailable property records and the deaths of key witnesses, specifically architects Alberto Pinto and Roger Salhi, prevented them from proving that Epstein's properties were not constructed or occupied at the times Jane recalled, which would have cast doubt on her testimony.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Epstein |
Mentioned as the owner of several properties (71st Street townhouse, New Mexico ranch, Palm Beach house, New York res...
|
|
| Jane | Witness |
A witness who testified about a trip to Epstein's ranch in New Mexico when she was "15 or 16."
|
| Alberto Pinto | Architect |
A deceased witness described as an architect who built, renovated, and decorated many of Epstein's residences.
|
| Roger Salhi | Architect |
A deceased witness described as an architect who built, renovated, and decorated many of Epstein's residences.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| the defense | legal team |
Mentioned throughout as the party arguing they could not challenge a witness's testimony due to unavailable records a...
|
| the government | government agency |
Mentioned as the opposing party whose proof the defense sought to contradict.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
An Epstein residence that the defense believes he did not occupy until 1996.
|
|
|
Location of Epstein's ranch.
|
|
|
The location Jane testified about visiting. The defense argues the main house was not completed until the late 1990s.
|
|
|
Location of one of Epstein's houses that was renovated in the mid-1990s.
|
|
|
One of Epstein's residences worked on by architects Pinto and Salhi.
|
"giant ranch sort of in the middle of nowhere … [which] seemed very empty on the interior."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,259 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document