| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Contractor architect |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Renovation of Epstein's residences | Florida, New York, New Mexico | View |
This document is a page from a legal filing (Document 657 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) addressing the Defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) claim that delay in prosecution caused prejudice to her defense. The text argues the defendant failed to prove substantial prejudice but outlines her specific claims regarding lost evidence, including flight records, financial documents, phone records, and property records. It specifically names deceased witnesses the defense claims were unavailable: architects Albert Pinto and Roger Salhi, and property manager Sally Markham.
This legal document is a filing from the defense in the case against Epstein, arguing that their ability to challenge a witness named Jane's testimony was hampered. The defense claims that unavailable property records and the deaths of key witnesses, specifically architects Alberto Pinto and Roger Salhi, prevented them from proving that Epstein's properties were not constructed or occupied at the times Jane recalled, which would have cast doubt on her testimony.
This legal document is a portion of a filing, likely from the prosecution, arguing against a Defendant's claim of prejudice due to a delay in prosecution. The prosecution asserts that the Defendant has failed to meet the high legal standard for proving prejudice, citing case law. The Defendant's claims are based on the loss of documentary evidence (flight, financial, phone, and property records related to Epstein) and the deaths of four potential witnesses (architects Albert Pinto and Roger Salhi, and property manager Sally Markham).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity