DOJ-OGR-00011607.jpg
642 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
642 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, in which a judge explains the legal considerations for an upcoming sentencing. The judge states the guideline range is 188 to 235 months but clarifies that, due to the Supreme Court's 'Booker' decision, this is only one of many factors to be considered under federal statute 18 U.S.C. 3553(a). The judge outlines these factors, including the nature of the offense, deterrence, and public safety, before concluding that the sentence must be sufficient but not greater than necessary.
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Supreme Court | Government Agency |
Mentioned for its decision in the 'Booker' case, which influences sentencing procedures.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings.
|
| DOJ-OGR | Government Agency |
Appears as part of the Bates number (DOJ-OGR-00011607) at the bottom right of the document, likely indicating the Dep...
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-07-22
The court is delivering a statement outlining the legal framework and factors it must consider before imposing a sentence on a defendant. This includes the guideline range, the Booker decision, and statutory requirements under 18 U.S.C. 3553(a).
Courtroom (implied)
THE COURT
defendant (unnamed)
Relationships (1)
The document is a transcript of the court explaining the legal basis for the sentence it will impose on the defendant.
Key Quotes (3)
"As I have stated, the guideline range applicable to this case is 188 to 235 months' imprisonment."Source
— THE COURT
(Stating the sentencing guideline range for the specific case being discussed.)
DOJ-OGR-00011607.jpg
Quote #1
"Under the Supreme Court's decision in a case called Booker and related cases, the guideline range is only one factor that the Court must consider in deciding the appropriate sentence."Source
— THE COURT
(Explaining that sentencing guidelines are advisory, not mandatory, based on legal precedent.)
DOJ-OGR-00011607.jpg
Quote #2
"I am required to impose a sentence sufficient, but no greater than necessary, to comply with the purposes I have just described."Source
— THE COURT
(Summarizing the legal obligation to impose a fair and just sentence that is not excessive.)
DOJ-OGR-00011607.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,130 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 737 Filed 07/22/22 Page 88 of 101 88
M6s2Max2
M6s2Max2
1 THE COURT: Thank you for your patience.
2 As I have stated, the guideline range applicable to
3 this case is 188 to 235 months' imprisonment.
4 Under the Supreme Court's decision in a case called
5 Booker and related cases, the guideline range is only one
6 factor that the Court must consider in deciding the appropriate
7 sentence. I am also required to consider the other factors set
8 forth in a provision called 18 U.S.C. 3553(a). These include
9 the nature and circumstances of the offense, and the history
10 and characteristics of the defendant; the need for the sentence
11 imposed to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote
12 respect for the law, to provide just punishment for the
13 offense, to afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct, to
14 protect the public from further crimes of the defendant, to
15 provide needed educational, vocational training, medical care,
16 or other treatment. I am to take into account the kinds of
17 sentences available, as I have said, the guideline range, any
18 pertinent policy statement, the need to avoid unwarranted
19 sentence disparities among defendants with similar records who
20 have been found guilty of similar conduct, the need to provide
21 restitution as appropriate under the law to any victims of the
22 offense.
23 I am required to impose a sentence sufficient, but no
24 greater than necessary, to comply with the purposes I have just
25 described. I have given substantial thought and attention to
2 As I have stated, the guideline range applicable to
3 this case is 188 to 235 months' imprisonment.
4 Under the Supreme Court's decision in a case called
5 Booker and related cases, the guideline range is only one
6 factor that the Court must consider in deciding the appropriate
7 sentence. I am also required to consider the other factors set
8 forth in a provision called 18 U.S.C. 3553(a). These include
9 the nature and circumstances of the offense, and the history
10 and characteristics of the defendant; the need for the sentence
11 imposed to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote
12 respect for the law, to provide just punishment for the
13 offense, to afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct, to
14 protect the public from further crimes of the defendant, to
15 provide needed educational, vocational training, medical care,
16 or other treatment. I am to take into account the kinds of
17 sentences available, as I have said, the guideline range, any
18 pertinent policy statement, the need to avoid unwarranted
19 sentence disparities among defendants with similar records who
20 have been found guilty of similar conduct, the need to provide
21 restitution as appropriate under the law to any victims of the
22 offense.
23 I am required to impose a sentence sufficient, but no
24 greater than necessary, to comply with the purposes I have just
25 described. I have given substantial thought and attention to
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
•
•
•
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00011607
•
•
•
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00011607
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document