DOJ-OGR-00019714.jpg
616 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
616 KB
Summary
This is a court order from United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated December 28, 2020, denying a defendant's application for release. The Court reaffirms its initial decision, concluding the defendant is a flight risk and that no conditions can ensure her appearance at future proceedings, thus warranting continued pre-trial detention. The order also instructs the parties to submit a joint letter regarding potential redactions by December 30, 2020.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| ALISON J. NATHAN | United States District Judge |
Signed the order as the presiding judge.
|
| Defendant | Defendant |
The subject of the court order, whose application for release was denied due to being a flight risk.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Court | government agency |
The judicial body that issued the order denying the Defendant's release and ordering pre-trial detention.
|
| Government | government agency |
The prosecuting party in the case, which the Court found had met its burden of persuasion regarding the Defendant's f...
|
Timeline (1 events)
2020-12-28
The Court denied the Defendant's application for release and ordered continued pre-trial detention, finding the Defendant to be a flight risk.
New York, New York
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location where the document was dated and signed.
|
Relationships (2)
The Court ruled against the Defendant's application for release, ordering her continued detention.
The Court found in favor of the Government's position, concluding that it had met its burden of persuasion to keep the Defendant detained.
Key Quotes (2)
"the Court again concludes that no conditions of release can reasonably assure the Defendant’s appearance at future proceedings."Source
— The Court
(The Court's conclusion justifying the denial of bail and continued detention of the Defendant.)
DOJ-OGR-00019714.jpg
Quote #1
"the Court concludes that the Government has met its burden of persuasion that the Defendant poses a flight risk and that pre-trial detention continues to be warranted."Source
— The Court
(The final ruling of the court on the matter of the Defendant's flight risk and pre-trial detention.)
DOJ-OGR-00019714.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,638 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 104 Filed 12/28/20 Page 2 of 2
none of the new information that the Defendant presented in support of her application has a material bearing on the Court’s determination that she poses a flight risk.
Furthermore, for substantially the same reasons as the Court determined that detention was warranted in the initial bail hearing, the Court again concludes that no conditions of release can reasonably assure the Defendant’s appearance at future proceedings. In reaching that conclusion, the Court considers the nature and circumstances of the offenses charged, the weight of the evidence against the Defendant, the history and characteristics of the Defendant, and the nature and seriousness of the danger that the Defendant’s release would pose. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g). The Government does not contend that the Defendant poses a danger to the community. Nonetheless the Court determines that the other three factors warrant detention under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e). The Court also finds that the Defendant’s proposed bail conditions would not reasonably assure her appearance at future proceedings.
As a result, the Court concludes that the Government has met its burden of persuasion that the Defendant poses a flight risk and that pre-trial detention continues to be warranted.
On or before December 30, 2020, the parties are ORDERED to submit a joint letter indicating whether they propose any redactions and the justification for any such proposal.
This resolves Dkt No. 97.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 28, 2020
New York, New York
New York, New York
ALISON J. NATHAN
United States District Judge
United States District Judge
2
DOJ-OGR-00019714
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document