This document is an unopposed motion filed on September 18, 2008, by Plaintiff Jane Doe in the Southern District of Florida (Case 08-80804) against Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. The plaintiff requests an extension of time to respond to Epstein's Motion to Dismiss until 15 days after the court rules on a pending motion to remand the case to state court due to alleged lack of federal jurisdiction. The document lists legal counsel for all parties, including Bruce Reinhart representing Sarah Kellen.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane Doe | Plaintiff |
Filing motion for enlargement of time
|
| Jane Doe No. 1 | Plaintiff |
Alias for Jane Doe
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Sued by Jane Doe
|
| Haley Robson | Defendant |
Sued by Jane Doe
|
| Sarah Kellen | Defendant |
Sued by Jane Doe
|
| Spencer T. Kuvin | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe; filed the motion
|
| Robert Critton | Attorney |
Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein
|
| Michael Pike | Attorney |
Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein
|
| Guy Alan Lewis | Attorney |
Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein
|
| Michael R. Tein | Attorney |
Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein
|
| Bruce E. Reinhart | Attorney |
Counsel for Sarah Kellen
|
| Douglas M. McIntosh | Attorney |
Counsel for Haley Robson
|
| Jason A. McGrath | Attorney |
Counsel for Haley Robson
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of Florida |
Court handling the case
|
|
| Leopold-Kuvin, P.A. |
Law firm representing Plaintiff
|
|
| Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP |
Law firm representing Defendant Epstein
|
|
| Lewis Tein |
Law firm representing Defendant Epstein
|
|
| Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A. |
Law firm representing Defendant Kellen
|
|
| McIntosh, Sawran, Peltz & Cartaya, P.A. |
Law firm representing Defendant Robson
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address of Leopold-Kuvin, P.A.
|
|
|
Address of Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman; Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A.; McIntosh, Sawran, Peltz & Cartaya
|
|
|
Address of Lewis Tein
|
"Plaintiff Jane Doe moves... for an enlargement of time to respond to Defendant Epstein’s Motion to Dismiss until fifteen days after the Court rules on her motion to remand."Source
"It is Plaintiff’s contention that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this case because it does not involve a federal question or parties with complete diversity of citizenship."Source
"Each attorney represented that his client does not oppose Plaintiff’s motion."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (4,338 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document