HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015590.jpg

1.19 MB

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal motion (court filing)
File Size: 1.19 MB
Summary

This document is a legal motion filed on February 3, 2016, by Alan Dershowitz in the Circuit Court of Broward County, Florida. Dershowitz requests a modification to a January 12, 2016 confidentiality order so that he may use the sealed deposition testimony of Virginia Roberts Giuffre (taken January 16, 2016) to contact witnesses and consult experts for his defense. He argues that restricting access to this testimony impedes his ability to represent himself and verify the accuracy of Roberts' claims.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Alan M. Dershowitz Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff
Filing a motion to modify a confidentiality order to use deposition testimony for his defense.
Bradley J. Edwards Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant
Named party in the lawsuit.
Paul G. Cassell Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant
Named party in the lawsuit.
Virginia Roberts Giuffre Non-party Deponent
Referenced as 'Roberts'; her deposition testimony is the subject of the motion.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit
Court where the case is filed (Broward County, Florida).
House Oversight
Referenced in the footer bates stamp.

Timeline (3 events)

2016-01-12
Confidentiality Order issued.
Broward County, Florida
2016-01-16
Deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre began.
Unknown
2016-02-03
Filing of the Redacted Motion to Modify Confidentiality Order.
Broward County, Florida

Locations (1)

Location Context
Jurisdiction of the court.

Relationships (2)

Alan M. Dershowitz Legal Adversary/Witness Virginia Roberts Giuffre
Dershowitz is analyzing Roberts' deposition testimony to build his defense.
Bradley J. Edwards Opposing Parties Alan M. Dershowitz
Listed as Plaintiff vs Defendant in the case caption.

Key Quotes (3)

"The Confidentiality Order should be modified at least to allow Dershowitz to defend this case."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015590.jpg
Quote #1
"Dershowitz and his counsel need to be able to contact witnesses, inform them of Roberts’s testimony, and ask them whether Ms. Roberts’s testimony is accurate."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015590.jpg
Quote #2
"The bottom line is that Dershowitz’s counsel must be able to use Roberts’s testimony as necessary in their professional judgment to represent their client, as a matter of fairness and due process."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015590.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,560 characters)

Filing # 37357304 E-Filed 02/03/2016 12:44:44 PM
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE NO.: CACE 15-000072
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and
PAUL G. CASSELL,
Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants,
vs.
ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ,
Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff.
________________________________________/
DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ’S REDACTED MOTION TO MODIFY CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER
Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff, Alan M. Dershowitz (“Dershowitz”), by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files his Redacted Motion to Modify Confidentiality Order of January 12, 2016, and in support thereof states the following:
On January 16, 2016, Defendant Alan M. Dershowitz began the deposition of non-party Virginia Roberts Giuffre (“Roberts”). Pursuant to this Court’s January 12, 2016 Confidentiality Order, that transcript currently is under seal. The Confidentiality Order should be modified at least to allow Dershowitz to defend this case. Dershowitz and his counsel need to be able to contact witnesses, inform them of Roberts’s testimony, and ask them whether Ms. Roberts’s testimony is accurate. They also need to be able to use Ms. Roberts’s testimony in other ways as part of the defense effort, such as by providing it to expert witnesses, among other things. The bottom line is that Dershowitz’s counsel must be able to use Roberts’s testimony as necessary in their professional judgment to represent their client, as a matter of fairness and due process.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015590

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document