DOJ-OGR-00011552.jpg

609 KB

Extraction Summary

8
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
3
Relationships
1
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 609 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, where attorneys debate whether Maxwell had a supervisory or leadership role over Sarah Kellen. One attorney argues against this, citing testimony from Larry Visoski and Cimberly Espinosa that Kellen was Epstein's assistant, not Maxwell's. In response, another attorney, Ms. Moe, references testimony from a witness named Carolyn who recalled Kellen scheduling massages while Maxwell was present at the Palm Beach residence, implying a connection.

People (8)

Name Role Context
Sarah Kellen Assistant
Discussed as a potential assistant to both Epstein and Maxwell, but testimony suggests she was Epstein's assistant.
Epstein
Mentioned as the employer of Sarah Kellen.
Maxwell
Subject of discussion regarding her potential supervisory role over Sarah Kellen. Referred to as Ms. Maxwell.
Larry Visoski Witness
His testimony is referenced, where he initially thought Kellen was an assistant for both Epstein and Maxwell but late...
Cimberly Espinosa Assistant for Ms. Maxwell
Her testimony is cited, stating unequivocally that she was Maxwell's assistant and Kellen was Epstein's assistant.
Carolyn Witness
Her testimony is referenced, recalling that Sarah Kellen scheduled massages and that Maxwell was present at the Palm ...
THE COURT Judge
Speaks to ask for further arguments on the government's objection.
MS. MOE Attorney
An attorney addressing the court regarding the 'leadership question' and citing Carolyn's testimony.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service.

Timeline (4 events)

An attorney is arguing against a 'leadership enhancement' for Maxwell, citing trial testimony to dispute the claim that Maxwell supervised Sarah Kellen.
Courtroom
THE COURT MS. MOE Unnamed speaker (likely an attorney)
Larry Visoski testified about Sarah Kellen's role as an assistant.
Courtroom
Cimberly Espinosa testified about her role as Maxwell's assistant and Sarah Kellen's role as Epstein's assistant.
Courtroom
Carolyn testified, recalling that Sarah Kellen scheduled massages and Maxwell was present at the Palm Beach residence for her appointments.
Courtroom

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned as the location where Maxwell was present when Carolyn arrived for massage appointments scheduled by Sarah ...

Relationships (3)

Sarah Kellen professional Epstein
Testimony from Cimberly Espinosa and the 'best recollection' of Larry Visoski indicate Sarah Kellen was an assistant for Epstein.
Sarah Kellen professional Maxwell
The document discusses whether Maxwell supervised Kellen. One speaker argues against this, citing testimony that Kellen worked for Epstein. Another speaker (Ms. Moe) implies a connection by noting Maxwell's presence when Kellen scheduled massages.
Cimberly Espinosa professional Maxwell
Cimberly Espinosa's testimony is cited, where she states, 'I was her assistant,' referring to Maxwell.

Key Quotes (1)

"I was her assistant. Kellen was Epstein's assistant."
Source
— Cimberly Espinosa (Quoted from her testimony to establish that Sarah Kellen worked for Epstein, not Maxwell.)
DOJ-OGR-00011552.jpg
Quote #1

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,470 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 737 Filed 07/22/22 Page 33 of 101
M6SQmax1
clearer, your Honor, this notion that she was somehow -- Sarah
Kellen was an assistant of both Epstein and Maxwell is again
belied by the trial record.
If you look at Larry Visoski's testimony, which I
believe is what the government is relying on there, he
originally testified, oh, I think she was an assistant for
both. But on cross-examination, he conceded that he really
didn't know what her role was, and his best recollection was
that she was an assistant for Epstein.
And again, just look again at Cimberly Espinosa's
testimony who was the actual assistant for Ms. Maxwell, and she
says unequivocally, "I was her assistant. Kellen was Epstein's
assistant." So there is no fair inference that Ms. Maxwell was
supervising Sarah Kellen. The inference is exactly the
opposite, and it can't provide a basis for that leadership
enhancement.
THE COURT: All right. Anything further on the
enhancements for the government's objection?
MS. MOE: Your Honor, just very briefly with respect
to the leadership question, I just want to direct the Court's
attention, we noted this on page 27 of our brief, but the
testimony at trial was that Carolyn recalled that even after
Sarah Kellen took over calling to schedule massages, Maxwell
was still present inside the Palm Beach residence when Carolyn
arrived for massage appointments.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00011552

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document