DOJ-OGR-00000043.tif
32.9 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document (petition for writ of certiorari)
File Size:
32.9 KB
Summary
This document is a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by Ghislaine Maxwell, seeking review of a judgment from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. It details the procedural history of her case, including the Second Circuit's opinion issued on September 17, 2024, and the denial of her motion for en banc review on November 25, 2024. The core of her appeal rests on the argument that the United States prosecuted her as a co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein, despite a prior non-prosecution agreement that allegedly covered Epstein's co-conspirators.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Petitioner |
Respectfully petitions for a writ of certiorari; her motion for en banc review was denied; prosecuted as a co-conspir...
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Co-conspirator |
Mentioned in the context of a non-prosecution agreement and Ghislaine Maxwell's prosecution as his co-conspirator.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit |
Court whose judgment Ghislaine Maxwell seeks to review; issued an opinion and denied Maxwell's motion for en banc rev...
|
|
| United States |
Party in legal cases (United States v. Maxwell); prosecuted Ghislaine Maxwell despite a non-prosecution agreement reg...
|
Timeline (2 events)
2024-11-25
Maxwell's motion for en banc review was denied by the Second Circuit.
Second Circuit
Relationships (1)
Ghislaine Maxwell was prosecuted as a co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein.
Key Quotes (1)
"Despite the existence of a non-prosecution agreement promising in plain language that the United States would not prosecute any co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein, the United States in fact prosecuted Ghislaine Maxwell as a co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000043.tif
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,346 characters)
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Ghislaine Maxwell respectfully petitions for a writ
of certiorari to review the judgment of the United
States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
OPINIONS BELOW
The opinion of the Second Circuit (App.1) is reported
at United States v. Maxwell, 118 F.4th 256 (2d Cir.
2024). The Second Circuit's order denying Maxwell's
petition for rehearing en banc (App.92) is not pub-
lished in the Federal Reporter. The district court's
order denying Maxwell's motion to dismiss (App.52) is
available at United States v. Maxwell, 534 F. Supp. 3d
299 (S.D.N.Y. 2021).
JURISDICTION
The Second Circuit issued its opinion on September
17, 2024. Maxwell's motion for en banc review was
denied on November 25, 2024. This Court has
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1254.
CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY
PROVISIONS INVOLVED
There are no pertinent constitutional or statutory
provisions involved in the matter at issue in this case.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Despite the existence of a non-prosecution agree-
ment promising in plain language that the United
States would not prosecute any co-conspirator of
Jeffrey Epstein, the United States in fact prosecuted
Ghislaine Maxwell as a co-conspirator of Jeffrey
Epstein.
Only because the United States did so in the Second
Circuit and not elsewhere, her motion to dismiss the
DOJ-OGR-00000043
Ghislaine Maxwell respectfully petitions for a writ
of certiorari to review the judgment of the United
States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
OPINIONS BELOW
The opinion of the Second Circuit (App.1) is reported
at United States v. Maxwell, 118 F.4th 256 (2d Cir.
2024). The Second Circuit's order denying Maxwell's
petition for rehearing en banc (App.92) is not pub-
lished in the Federal Reporter. The district court's
order denying Maxwell's motion to dismiss (App.52) is
available at United States v. Maxwell, 534 F. Supp. 3d
299 (S.D.N.Y. 2021).
JURISDICTION
The Second Circuit issued its opinion on September
17, 2024. Maxwell's motion for en banc review was
denied on November 25, 2024. This Court has
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1254.
CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY
PROVISIONS INVOLVED
There are no pertinent constitutional or statutory
provisions involved in the matter at issue in this case.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Despite the existence of a non-prosecution agree-
ment promising in plain language that the United
States would not prosecute any co-conspirator of
Jeffrey Epstein, the United States in fact prosecuted
Ghislaine Maxwell as a co-conspirator of Jeffrey
Epstein.
Only because the United States did so in the Second
Circuit and not elsewhere, her motion to dismiss the
DOJ-OGR-00000043
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document