027-01.pdf
19.5 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal order (final order of dismissal)
File Size:
19.5 KB
Summary
A Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice from the United States District Court Southern District of Florida for Case No. 9:10-cv-81111. The case, involving plaintiff 'M.J.' against defendants Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen, was dismissed following a settlement between the parties on December 13, 2010. Judge William P. Dimitrouleas ordered the case closed while retaining jurisdiction to enforce the settlement terms.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| M.J. | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in the civil case against Epstein and Kellen
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Defendant in the civil case
|
| Sarah Kellen | Defendant |
Defendant in the civil case
|
| William P. Dimitrouleas | Judge |
United States District Judge presiding over the case
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of Florida |
Court where the case was filed
|
Timeline (2 events)
2010-12-13
Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice filed
Southern District of Florida
2010-12-13
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the court chambers where the order was signed
|
Relationships (3)
Plaintiff M.J. vs. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
Plaintiff M.J. vs. Defendant Sarah Kellen
Listed together as Defendants
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,107 characters)
Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD Document 27-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/13/2010 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 9:10-cv-81111
M.J.,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN and
SARAH KELLEN,
SARAH KELLEN,
Defendants.
______________________________/
______________________________/
FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the parties' Stipulation of Dismissal with
Prejudice [DE ____], filed December 13, 2010. The Court has reviewed the Stipulation, the
pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise advised in the premises. In accordance with the
parties' Stipulation, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
Prejudice [DE ____], filed December 13, 2010. The Court has reviewed the Stipulation, the
pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise advised in the premises. In accordance with the
parties' Stipulation, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The above-styled action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
2. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.
3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' settlement.
4. The Clerk shall CLOSE THIS CASE.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida this _
day of _______, 2010.
day of _______, 2010.
______________________________
WILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS
United States District Judge
WILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS
United States District Judge
Copies Furnished to:
All counsel of record
All counsel of record
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document