M.J. Minkin
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
SARAH KELLEN
|
Legal representative |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
S.M. Pincus
|
Co author |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Walter Pincus
|
Co authors |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Client |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Litigation |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Litigation adversaries |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
PAUL G. CASSELL
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
PAUL G. CASSELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Gary Farmer
|
Client |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-12-13 | N/A | Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice filed | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2010-12-13 | N/A | Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice signed and filed | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2010-11-02 | N/A | Plaintiff M.J. files notice to strike previous certificates of service (DE 5 and DE 6) due to inc... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2010-10-11 | N/A | Plaintiff filed Motion for Protective Order (D.E. 16) and Motion for Preservation of Evidence (D.... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2010-09-17 | N/A | Filing of Civil Cover Sheet for lawsuit M.J. v. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2010-09-17 | N/A | Summons entered on FLSD Docket | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2010-09-17 | N/A | Complaint filed and summons issued. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2010-09-17 | N/A | M.J. filed complaint against Jeffrey Epstein. | Southern District of Florida | View |
027.pdf
Legal stipulation filed on December 13, 2010, in the Southern District of Florida, dismissing the case of M.J. vs. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen with prejudice. The document confirms a settlement was reached, with the court retaining jurisdiction to enforce its terms, and states that each party will bear their own attorney's fees.
027-01.pdf
A Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice from the United States District Court Southern District of Florida for Case No. 9:10-cv-81111. The case, involving plaintiff 'M.J.' against defendants Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen, was dismissed following a settlement between the parties on December 13, 2010. Judge William P. Dimitrouleas ordered the case closed while retaining jurisdiction to enforce the settlement terms.
026.pdf
This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of Florida dated December 6, 2010, in the case of M.J. v. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow granted Jeffrey Epstein's unopposed motion for an extension of time to respond to the Plaintiff's motions regarding a protective order and preservation of evidence. The new deadline for Epstein's response was set for December 13, 2010.
025.pdf
This document is an unopposed motion filed on November 29, 2010, by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team requesting a 10-day extension to respond to two plaintiff motions regarding protective orders and evidence preservation. The motion states that the parties are currently in discussions to resolve the matters and that plaintiff's counsel, Gary Farmer, does not oppose the extension. The document lists M.J. as the plaintiff and Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen as defendants.
024.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of Florida dated November 23, 2010, in the case of M.J. vs. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. Judge William P. Dimitrouleas granted a motion allowing attorney Paul G. Cassell to appear on behalf of the Plaintiff and receive electronic filings.
022.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on November 23, 2010, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case 9:10-CV-81111-WPD). Attorney Bradley J. Edwards requests the court to admit Paul G. Cassell (a member of the Utah Bar) to appear pro hac vice as co-counsel for the plaintiff, identified as M.J., in a civil suit against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. The document documents the payment of a $75 admission fee and lists the defense counsel for Jeffrey Epstein from the firm Fowler White Burnett PA.
020.pdf
This document is a Reply in Support of a Motion to Quash Service of Process filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team in November 2010. The defense argues that the plaintiff failed to properly serve Epstein because the papers were left with an individual named 'Mark' at Epstein's New York home (9 East 71st St), but the plaintiff failed to prove 'Mark' resided there or was of suitable discretion. The filing also seeks to strike allegations regarding obstruction of justice in prior litigation and opposes sanctions against Epstein.
020-01.pdf
This document is a Supplemental Affidavit filed on November 22, 2010, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD). Richard Barnett, the property manager of 9 East 71st Street in New York, testifies that he does not reside at the property, that no one resided there on October 8, 2010, and specifically that Jeffrey Epstein was not present at that location on that date.
019.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of Florida in the case of M.J. vs. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen, dated November 12, 2010. Judge William P. Dimitrouleas refers two motions—one for a protective order barring contact by Epstein and another for preservation of evidence regarding correspondence with the U.S. Attorneys Office—to Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow.
016.pdf
This document is a Motion for a Protective Order filed by plaintiff M.J. on November 11, 2010, requesting the court bar Jeffrey Epstein from direct or indirect contact. The motion details a pattern of Epstein using private investigators to harass and intimidate victims and witnesses, specifically citing an incident on July 1, 2010, where a PI named Thaddeus Knowles followed 'Jane Doe' and flashed lights into her home. It also references Epstein's intimidation of other witnesses including Sarah Kellen, Leslie Groff, and Alfredo Rodriguez, and his history of violating no-contact orders.
015.pdf
This document is a Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Quash Service of Process. The plaintiff, M.J., argues that service was properly effected on October 8, 2010, when a private investigator handed the papers to an employee named 'Mark' at Epstein's New York mansion. The filing accuses Epstein and his associate Richard Barnett of fraud and perjury for submitting an affidavit claiming service never occurred, and details a pattern of obstruction by Epstein and his associates (including Ghislaine Maxwell and Jean Luc Brunel) in similar civil cases.
014.pdf
A legal motion filed on November 10, 2010, by Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys requesting the court to quash service of process in the case of M.J. v. Epstein. The defense argues that leaving an unmarked envelope in the mailbox of Epstein's New York vacation home and claiming to leave papers with a non-existent person named 'Mark' violates Federal, New York, and Florida service laws. The document includes arguments citing specific statutes and an affidavit from Richard Barnett denying the presence of anyone named 'Mark' at the residence.
013.pdf
A court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida dated November 8, 2010, in the case of M.J. vs. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. Judge William P. Dimitrouleas denied Jeffrey Epstein's motion to quash service of process without prejudice because the motion failed to comply with local rules requiring a certification of good faith effort to confer with opposing parties.
012-01.pdf
This document is a legal affidavit filed on November 3, 2010, in the case of M.J. v. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. The affiant, Richard Barnett, states that he was present at Epstein's residence at 9 East 71st Street, NYC, for the entire day of October 8, 2010. He testifies that no individual named 'Mark' worked, resided, was present, or received a subpoena at that location on that date.
010.pdf
This document is a legal notice filed on November 2, 2010, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case 9:10-cv-81111) by the plaintiff, identified as M.J. The filing strikes two previous certificates of service (DE 5 and DE 6) related to a summons and a subpoena for defendant Jeffrey Epstein due to incorrect filing. The document names Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen as defendants and lists contact information for attorneys representing both sides.
007.pdf
This document is a Motion to Quash Service of Process filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team on October 29, 2010, in the Southern District of Florida. Epstein's lawyers argue that the plaintiff, 'M.J.', failed to properly serve Epstein with the lawsuit because the documents were merely left in an unmarked envelope in the mailbox of his New York residence (9 East 71st Street) rather than being delivered personally as required by law. The document details the specific dates of the attempted service and cites Florida, New York, and Federal laws to support the argument that the service was legally ineffective.
007-01.pdf
This document is an affidavit by Richard Barnett filed on October 29, 2010, in the case of M.J. v. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen in the Southern District of Florida. Barnett testifies that on October 13, 2010, he discovered an unmarked envelope containing legal documents (Summons, Complaint, Civil Rico Statement) in the mailbox of Epstein's home at 9 East 71st Street, NYC. He asserts that service was never personally delivered to anyone at the residence.
001-04.pdf
This document is a 'Summons in a Civil Action' filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on September 17, 2010. The case (No. 9:10-cv-81111-WPD) involves plaintiff 'M.J.' suing defendants Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. The summons is addressed to Sarah Kellen at an apartment in Palm Beach, FL, instructing her to respond to the complaint within 21 days via plaintiff's attorney Bradley J. Edwards.
001-03.pdf
This document is a Summons in a Civil Action filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida on September 17, 2010. The plaintiff, identified as M.J., is suing Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. The document commands Epstein to respond within 21 days and lists Bradley J. Edwards as the plaintiff's attorney. The second page is an unfilled Proof of Service form.
001-02.pdf
This document is a Civil Cover Sheet filed on September 17, 2010, in the Southern District of Florida for Case 9:10-cv-81111. The plaintiff, identified only as M.J., is suing Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen for 'Sexual exploitation of a minor' and demanding a jury trial. The plaintiff is represented by attorney Bradley J. Edwards.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013780.jpg
This document appears to be page 280 of a larger file produced for the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013780). It contains a bibliography of scientific research papers published between 1967 and 1998, covering topics such as neurology, chaos theory, entropy, and heart rate rhythms. While part of an investigation file, the page itself lists academic citations with no direct mention of Epstein or associates.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013746.jpg
This document appears to be a single page (page 246) from a scientific text or academic paper discussing mathematical concepts applied to biology, specifically 'approximate entropy' and 'power spectral entropy' in dynamical systems and neuroendocrine studies. It references various researchers (Pincus, Roelfsema, Farmer) and medical conditions like Cushing's syndrome and menopause. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's connections to scientific funding or research.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity