This document appears to be page 31 of a larger geopolitical or historical analysis report, bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. The text analyzes the strategic geography of Israel and the Levant, explaining why historical Israel developed as a land power rather than a naval power despite coastal access. It discusses the historical necessity for Mediterranean empires like Rome and Carthage to control the Levant to secure their eastern flanks and avoid reliance solely on sea transport.
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Indicated by footer stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'
|
|
| Rome |
Mentioned as a Mediterranean empire needing control of the Levant
|
|
| Carthage |
Mentioned as a Mediterranean empire
|
|
| Assyrians |
Mentioned as defeating the northern kingdom of Israel
|
|
| Babylon |
Mentioned as defeating Judea
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
"It is defeated by Israel's strategic advantage of interior lines."Source
"No Mediterranean empire could be fully secure unless it controlled the Levant."Source
"Israel, the area south of Mount Hermon, was always forced to be a land power."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,981 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document