HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031864.jpg

2.5 MB

Extraction Summary

0
People
5
Organizations
9
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Geopolitical analysis / report page (house oversight production)
File Size: 2.5 MB
Summary

This document appears to be page 31 of a larger geopolitical or historical analysis report, bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. The text analyzes the strategic geography of Israel and the Levant, explaining why historical Israel developed as a land power rather than a naval power despite coastal access. It discusses the historical necessity for Mediterranean empires like Rome and Carthage to control the Levant to secure their eastern flanks and avoid reliance solely on sea transport.

Organizations (5)

Name Type Context
House Oversight Committee
Indicated by footer stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'
Rome
Mentioned as a Mediterranean empire needing control of the Levant
Carthage
Mentioned as a Mediterranean empire
Assyrians
Mentioned as defeating the northern kingdom of Israel
Babylon
Mentioned as defeating Judea

Timeline (3 events)

Historical
Defeat of Israel (northern kingdom)
Israel
Historical
Defeat of Judea
Judea
Historical (approx. 5 centuries duration)
Duration of Israel's first incarnation
Israel

Relationships (2)

Israel Geopolitical Levant
when Israel is intact, it will tend to be the dominant power in the Levant
Rome Strategic Necessity Levant
needed to anchor its eastern flank on the Levant

Key Quotes (3)

"It is defeated by Israel's strategic advantage of interior lines."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031864.jpg
Quote #1
"No Mediterranean empire could be fully secure unless it controlled the Levant."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031864.jpg
Quote #2
"Israel, the area south of Mount Hermon, was always forced to be a land power."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031864.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,981 characters)

31
is rare, is rarely coordinated and usually is not designed to be a
mortal blow. It is defeated by Israel's strategic advantage of interior
lines.
Israeli Geography and the Convergence Zone
Therefore, it is not surprising that Israel's first incarnation lasted as
long as it did — some five centuries. What is interesting and what
must be considered is why Israel (now considered as the northern
kingdom) was defeated by the Assyrians and Judea, then defeated by
Babylon. To understand this, we need to consider the broader
geography of Israel's location.
Israel is located on the eastern shore of the Mediterranean Sea, on the
Levant. As we have seen, when Israel is intact, it will tend to be the
dominant power in the Levant. Therefore, Israeli resources must
generally be dedicated for land warfare, leaving little over for naval
warfare. In general, although Israel had excellent harbors and access
to wood for shipbuilding, it never was a major Mediterranean naval
power. It never projected power into the sea. The area to the north of
Israel has always been a maritime power, but Israel, the area south of
Mount Hermon, was always forced to be a land power.
The Levant in general and Israel in particular has always been a
magnet for great powers. No Mediterranean empire could be fully
secure unless it controlled the Levant. Whether it was Rome or
Carthage, a Mediterranean empire that wanted to control both the
northern and southern littorals needed to anchor its eastern flank on
the Levant. For one thing, without the Levant, a Mediterranean power
would be entirely dependent on sea lanes for controlling the other
shore. Moving troops solely by sea creates transport limitations and
logistical problems. It also leaves imperial lines vulnerable to
interdiction — sometimes merely from pirates, a problem that
plagued Rome's sea transport. A land bridge, or a land bridge with
minimal water crossings that can be easily defended, is a vital
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031864

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document