Judea
LocationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Israel (Northern Kingdom)
|
Historical division |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Defeat of Judea | Judea | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conquest of Judea by Babylon | Judea | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031866.jpg
This document is page 33 of a larger report stamped by the House Oversight Committee. It contains a geopolitical analysis of Israel, detailing its strategic importance to European and Eastern powers and analyzing its internal geographic divisions (Coastal, Northeast/Hill Country, and Southern Desert). It draws parallels between these geographic regions and the historical social types (merchants, warriors, herdsmen) that inhabit them.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031864.jpg
This document appears to be page 31 of a larger geopolitical or historical analysis report, bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. The text analyzes the strategic geography of Israel and the Levant, explaining why historical Israel developed as a land power rather than a naval power despite coastal access. It discusses the historical necessity for Mediterranean empires like Rome and Carthage to control the Levant to secure their eastern flanks and avoid reliance solely on sea transport.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027950.jpg
This document is page 102 of a memoir (likely Ehud Barak's) included in House Oversight files. It details the narrator's university years, his struggle to balance studies with army reserve duty, and a pivotal moment in his relationship with a woman named Nili during the late 1960s (referenced by 'Karameh'). The narrator describes feeling socially alienated at a Tel Aviv party and subsequently attempting to organize a trip to the desert to define their relationship, which resulted in perceived rejection when she failed to respond to his note.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032168.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a larger correspondence or memorandum regarding Israeli geopolitical strategy. The author argues that the 'two-state solution' is safer for the 'Zionist Project' than a 'one-state solution,' which they claim would lead to a non-Jewish or non-democratic state. The text asserts the IDF's military superiority allows for risks associated with interim arrangements and claims that most former Israeli security chiefs would agree with this assessment.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity