HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023628.jpg

2.92 MB

Extraction Summary

6
People
2
Organizations
3
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Article / profile (evidence file)
File Size: 2.92 MB
Summary

This document appears to be a page from a profile article (circa 2016) about Jeffrey Epstein, marked as evidence for the House Oversight Committee. It discusses Epstein's theories on wealth transfer among the 'hyper rich,' his role as a 'rich whisperer,' and his lifestyle, including a lunch meeting in New York where he claimed he hadn't eaten in a restaurant in a decade. The text also notably describes his household as lacking a wife or children but being staffed by a group of young women in their twenties and thirties, comparing the atmosphere to 'Eyes Wide Shut.'

People (6)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey Epstein Subject
Described as a 63-year-old philanthropist, 'rich whisperer', and wealthy advisor.
Unidentified Author/Interviewer Journalist/Author
Met Epstein for lunch in New York.
Thomas Piketty Economist
Referenced regarding wealth inequality theories.
Rockefeller Historical Figure
Cited as an example of social-engineering philanthropy.
Carnegie Historical Figure
Cited as an example of social-engineering philanthropy.
Young women Staff/Companions
Group in their 20s and 30s acting as support staff and companions; described as 'somewhere between Daddy Warbucks and...

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Forbes
Mentioned in the context of the 'Forbes 400' list.
U.S. House Oversight Committee
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.

Timeline (1 events)

Circa 2016
Lunch meeting in New York
New York restaurant

Locations (3)

Location Context
Location of the lunch meeting between the author and Epstein.
Mentioned as part of Epstein's wealth; one is noted as being 'for guests'.
Epstein's residence, described as having no wife or children but staff of young women.

Relationships (2)

Jeffrey Epstein Employer/Companion Young women (staff)
Text describes a group of young women (20s-30s) acting as support staff and companions.
Jeffrey Epstein Interview Subject/Interviewer Author
Met for lunch in New York.

Key Quotes (5)

"In the past, only governments had this kind of money, money of a truly altering scale"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023628.jpg
Quote #1
"So, to understand the future, what you have to begin to do is follow the money, not in Watergate- like terms backwards, as in who has gotten it, but forwards to where it will go and who will get it."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023628.jpg
Quote #2
"Nobody, nobody, of the hyperwealthy wants to give it all to their children."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023628.jpg
Quote #3
"Epstein’s role... is not only as an experienced philanthropist himself but as a sort of adviser or brain—the 'rich whisperer'"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023628.jpg
Quote #4
"somewhere between Daddy Warbucks and Eyes Wide Shut."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023628.jpg
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (4,745 characters)

Missions to Mars, age reversal. understanding the big bang, teleportation , Artificial Intelligence and
Synthetic Biology are this weeks topics.
“In the past, only governments had this kind of money, money of a truly altering scale,” says Epstein in a
chipper and smoothed-out Brooklynese. “In fact, it used to be that the rich, reaching a certain point of
philanthropy, merely hoped to help make the world a better place, now they want to question some basic
assumptions and try change the world. Rockefeller and Carnegie were, as examples of social-engineering
philanthropy, unique for their time . They alone had such resources and will. Now you have legions of people
who must at some point ( hopefully before death, but eventually non the less ) transfer vastly larger fortunes
than Rockefeller or Carnegie had at their disposal, or might even have imagined.
“Except that it turns out it is actually hard to give away this kind of wealth, without unintended negative
consequences that may cause as many problems as you’re solving.”
Epstein’s long-time business thesis is that the hyper rich know very little about the essence of money. They
may know about their own businesses, but the great sums that are realized as a result are ultimately an
afterthought and demand an entirely different sort of intellectual discipline. The Forbes 400, says Epstein, not
immune to an amount of wonder, increased their wealth by $500 billion last year, meaning, in effect, that on
average every Forbes-list billionaire makes more than another billion every year. And, points out the 63-year-
old Epstein, they will almost all be dead in 50 years, most well before that, meaning $4.2 trillion, compounding
everyday, will eventually willhave to be transferred to new hands . “So, to understand the future, what you have
to begin to do is follow the money, not in Watergate- like terms backwards, as in who has gotten it, but forwards
to where it will go and who will get it.”
Epstein can find himself echoing aspects of Thomas Piketty on the inequities of the accumulation of wealth
(“the divide is between people with assets, which appreciate, and people without assets, who fail to
advance—that is, of course, the miracle of compounded interest”), except for the fact that Epstein, knowing the
rich, understands a point that Piketty doesn’t: “Nobody, nobody, of the hyperwealthy wants to give it all to their
children. Everybody now has the modern appreciation that one of the curses of great wealth is that its burdens
are in many cases too much to handle. One of his rules for the younger generation eventual recipients is that
they all take accounting classes. Along with a video tape of the parents discussing their views on money. This
acts as the bible for the too often conflicts amongst following generations
Epstein’s role in this discussion of the private allotment of what is in fact a decent fraction of the U.S. Gross
Domestic Product is not only as an experienced philanthropist himself but as a sort of adviser or brain—the “
rich whisperer”—making him, in addition to his own vast wealth ( two private islands , one for guests ) ,
arguably among the most influential people you’ve only heard of for reasons that have absolutely nothing to
do with his influence.
Epstein sometimes seems to have an out-of-body attitude toward his own fate and bad press—that’s something
that occurs and there is little one can do in the parallel world of the lunchbox crowd . Not long ago, when I
met him for lunch in New York, he noted that he hadn’t been out to eat out in a restaurant in ten years. It was a
not particularly pleasant experience for him and we were done in 30 minutes. ( He said he couldn’t connect
with so many distractions )
On the other hand, Epstein’s life sometimes may seem part of a challenge: not just look at me, but, even I can’t
believe what you see? But, perhaps, he is just naive to what others are thinking: a negligent and in a sense
childish tone deafness.
Press accounts recycle the mysterious billionaire mythology—a man of vast and unsourced riches living in a
parallel world of absolute entitlement—with brief glimpses of him stepping out of the house (the same photos
endlessly republished), and the assumption of wrongdoing inside.
In fact, the life in the house, without wife or children or conventional domestic demeanor, rather conforms to
the scripted fantasies: somewhere between Daddy Warbucks and Eyes Wide Shut. There is indeed a group of
young women—in their twenties and thirties—who act as Epstein’s support staff and companions. Some have
worked for him for many years, marrying, having children, and continuing as part of his business and
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023628

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document