Carnegie
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
John D. Rockefeller
|
Peer historical figure |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1997-01-01 | N/A | Ruling in Carnegie v. Tedder | Florida (2d DCA) | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020516.jpg
This document is Section 5 of a House Oversight report discussing 'Think Tanks.' It details the history of US think tanks, originating with philanthropists like Carnegie and Rockefeller, and outlines their role in shaping public policy and opinion. The text specifically highlights that think tanks are high-value targets for foreign influence, particularly from the People's Republic of China, and discusses the 501(c)(3) tax status governing these organizations. While the user query pertains to Epstein, this specific page does not mention him directly, though it may be part of a larger production of documents related to foreign influence or oversight investigations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023628.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a profile article (circa 2016) about Jeffrey Epstein, marked as evidence for the House Oversight Committee. It discusses Epstein's theories on wealth transfer among the 'hyper rich,' his role as a 'rich whisperer,' and his lifestyle, including a lunch meeting in New York where he claimed he hadn't eaten in a restaurant in a decade. The text also notably describes his household as lacking a wife or children but being staffed by a group of young women in their twenties and thirties, comparing the atmosphere to 'Eyes Wide Shut.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015624.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal response by Edwards and Cassell in a case against Alan Dershowitz, arguing that sexual abuse allegations are inherent to the lawsuit and not peripheral. The text references legal precedents regarding confidentiality and cites Dershowitz's own counterclaim, which quotes specific allegations that Epstein forced a minor (Jane Doe #3) to have sexual relations with Dershowitz in various locations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015623.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal response filed by Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell against Alan Dershowitz's Motion to Determine Confidentiality of Court Records. The text outlines legal exceptions for confidentiality under Florida Judicial Administration rules, arguing that none apply because the case is a defamation action where disclosure is inherent to the proceedings. The filing cites precedents such as Barron v. Florida Freedom Newspapers and Carnegie v. Tedder to support the argument that defamatory material cannot be sealed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026351.jpg
This document is an email from Jeffrey Epstein to journalist Michael Wolff, dated March 31, 2015, in which Epstein forwards a detailed list of fact-checking questions from Alex Yablon of New York Magazine. The questions probe into Epstein's personal life, wealth, business dealings, and his relationships with various individuals, including Wolff, Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Eva Andersson Dubin, and his female support staff. The questions imply potential romantic or transactional relationships with staff and question a $20 million investment offer to Wolff.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026348.jpg
This document is an email from Jeffrey Epstein to Darren Indyke, dated March 31, 2015, forwarding a message he received earlier that day from journalist Alex Yablon. Yablon's email contains a comprehensive list of fact-checking questions for a New York Magazine story, probing into Epstein's personal life, wealth, business dealings, and relationships. The questions cover specific events, financial transactions, and his associations with high-profile individuals like Bill Gates, Prince Andrew, and Alan Dershowitz, as well as the nature of his relationship with his 'support staff of young women'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity