This document is a court transcript from May 22, 2009, discussing the definition of 'indirect contact' with victims, the number of victims ('several'), and whether a residential address applies to prevent contact. The court emphasizes that there should be no direct or indirect contact, specifying that indirect includes no text messages, email, Facebook, MySpace, telephone calls, or voice mails. The participants are MS. BELOHLAVEK, MR. GOLDBERGER, and THE COURT.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. BELOHLAVEK | Speaker |
Responding to questions about victims and contact
|
| MR. GOLDBERGER | Speaker |
Speaking about due diligence and residential street
|
| PHYLLIS A. DAMES | Official Court Reporter |
Document author/transcriber
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Document entered on FLSD Docket
|
"MS. BELOHLAVEK: I personally do not know."Source
"THE COURT: Neither do I, which is why I'm asking. Has that been investigated?"Source
"MR. GOLDBERGER: We have done our due diligence, for what it's worth, there is a residential street. There are not children congregating on that street. We think the address applies, if it doesn't, we fully recognize that he can't live there."Source
"THE COURT: Okay. Dis, you shall not have any contact with the victim, are there more than one victim?"Source
"MS. BELOHLAVEK: There's several."Source
"THE COURT: Several, all of the victims. So this should be plural. I'm making that plural. You are not to have any contact direct or indirect, and in this day and age I find it necessary to go over exactly what we mean by indirect. By indirect, we mean no text messages, no e-mail, no Face Book, no My Space, no telephone calls, no voice mails, no"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,093 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document