FLSD
LocationRelationship Network
034-01.pdf
This document is a sworn declaration by Dr. Gilbert W. Kliman, a forensic psychiatrist, filed on June 8, 2009, in the case of Does v. Jeffrey Epstein. Dr. Kliman argues against the defense's motion to publicly disclose the identities of six Jane Doe plaintiffs, stating that such exposure would cause severe psychological harm, including revictimization, stigmatization, and retraumatization. He details how Epstein manipulated the victims by posing as a mentor and outlines the plaintiffs' diagnoses of PTSD and depression, concluding that anonymity is clinically necessary to prevent further injury.
DOJ-OGR-00030312.tif
This document is a court transcript from May 22, 2009, discussing the definition of 'indirect contact' with victims, the number of victims ('several'), and whether a residential address applies to prevent contact. The court emphasizes that there should be no direct or indirect contact, specifying that indirect includes no text messages, email, Facebook, MySpace, telephone calls, or voice mails. The participants are MS. BELOHLAVEK, MR. GOLDBERGER, and THE COURT.
DOJ-OGR-00000310.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal filing (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM) entered on July 9, 2019. The government argues that the Petitioners (victims) lack standing to void Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) because the government is contractually bound to it, and a favorable ruling would not redress their injury. However, the document notably admits that a federal investigation and potential prosecution of Epstein remains a 'legally viable possibility' regardless of the NPA's status.
DOJ-OGR-00000300.jpg
This document is an addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement for Jeffrey Epstein, modifying paragraph 7. It clarifies the process for appointing an independent attorney representative for his victims and establishes Epstein's financial obligation to pay this representative's fees and hourly rate. However, it specifies that this obligation ceases if the representative chooses to file contested litigation against Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00000298.jpg
This document is the signature page (Page 7 of 7) of the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement between the United States and Jeffrey Epstein. It features the handwritten signatures of Jeffrey Epstein and his lawyer Gerald Lefcourt, dated September 24, 2007, alongside certifications that Epstein understood the agreement's conditions. The document also lists U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta and A. Marie Villafana, though their signatures are not present on this specific page.
DOJ-OGR-00020808.jpg
This document is a signature page for an addendum to a Non-Prosecution Agreement concerning Jeffrey Epstein. It confirms Epstein's understanding and agreement to the terms. The document is signed on October 29, 2007, by Lilly Ann Sanchez, an attorney for Epstein, and on October 30, 2007, by a representative for the U.S. Attorney's office.
DOJ-OGR-00004661.jpg
This document is a signature page for an Addendum to Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It certifies that Epstein understands the clarifications to the NPA. The document is signed by Lilly Ann Sanchez (Epstein's attorney) on October 29, 2007, and by a First Assistant U.S. Attorney (FAUSA) on behalf of A. Marie Villafaña on October 30, 2007; Epstein's and Gerald Lefcourt's signature lines are present but blank.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014086.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM) arguing that Alan Dershowitz has failed to produce exculpatory documentary evidence in court despite publicly claiming on Fox News that such evidence exists to disprove Jane Doe No. 3's sexual misconduct allegations. The filing references a parallel state defamation case (*Edwards v. Dershowitz*) where Dershowitz also allegedly refused discovery requests. It suggests the court should infer the evidence does not exist and that the accuser's allegations are true.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity