EFTA00013996.pdf
20.7 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
0
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email
File Size:
20.7 KB
Summary
This is a heavily redacted email from June 18, 2008, with the subject 'Epstein'. The sender informs the recipients that they attempted to call Roy Black but left a message. Crucially, the email notes that an immunity request has been approved for 'one of the New York victims/recruiters' and discusses the logistics of sending this documentation.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Roy Black | Defense Attorney |
Sender put in a call to him regarding Epstein; he was unavailable.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject |
Subject of the email.
|
| Unnamed Victim/Recruiter | Subject of immunity request |
An immunity request was approved for one of the New York victims/recruiters.
|
| Redacted Sender | Author |
Wrote the email, called Roy Black.
|
| Redacted Approver | Official/Authority |
Approved an immunity request.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2008-06-18
Approval of immunity request for a New York victim/recruiter.
New York (contextual)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location associated with the victims/recruiters mentioned.
|
Relationships (1)
Sender put in a call to Roy Black.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (494 characters)
From: [Redacted]
To: [Redacted]
Bcc: [Redacted]
Subject: Epstein
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:06:43 +0000
Importance: Normal
To: [Redacted]
Bcc: [Redacted]
Subject: Epstein
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:06:43 +0000
Importance: Normal
Hi guys – [Redacted] and I put in a call to Roy Black this morning. He was “unavailable,” so we left a message.
[Redacted] has approved an immunity request for one of the New York victims/recruiters. [Redacted] is out so we are going to send it down to you, but I wondered who it should go to first, one of you or [Redacted]
[Redacted] has approved an immunity request for one of the New York victims/recruiters. [Redacted] is out so we are going to send it down to you, but I wondered who it should go to first, one of you or [Redacted]
Thanks.
[Large Redacted Block]
EFTA00013996
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document