| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
31
Very Strong
|
32 | |
|
person
Dershowitz
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Fronstin
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Sloman
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Goldberger
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Justin Bieber
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Riley
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Darren Indyke
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
Legal representative |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Rush Limbaugh
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Dershowitz
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Investigator
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Client
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Goldberger
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alexander Acosta
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Darren Indyke
|
Co counsel professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
private investigators
|
Employer director |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Goldberger
|
Co counsel |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
Jack Goldberger
|
Business associate |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney (Redacted)
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jay Lefkowitz
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (USAFLS)
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Signing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and waiver of grand jury indictment. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Legal investigation | A state investigation into allegations that Epstein coerced girls into sexual activity, leading h... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Prosecutors and agents met with Epstein's attorney, Roy Black. | Unknown | View |
| 2020-10-12 | N/A | Discovery of communications from private investigator Roy Black in the database. | Florida (context) | View |
| 2019-05-29 | N/A | Roy Black forwarded his 'no comment' email to Jeffrey Epstein and his legal team (Martin Weinberg... | N/A | View |
| 2019-05-29 | N/A | Roy Black responds to a press inquiry regarding a 'trump story' and forwards the response to Epst... | Miami, FL | View |
| 2019-05-29 | N/A | Roy Black responded to an inquiry (likely from the press) about a 'trump story', stating he had n... | N/A | View |
| 2019-05-29 | N/A | Legal team finalizing pleading regarding plaintiff's position on remedies. | Miami, FL | View |
| 2019-05-29 | N/A | Finalization of a legal pleading regarding a plaintiff's position on remedies, as mentioned by Ro... | N/A | View |
| 2016-04-28 | N/A | Reuters inquiry regarding a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein initiates an email chain among his le... | N/A | View |
| 2014-05-02 | N/A | Protective Order Entered | West Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| 2011-08-19 | N/A | Court hearing regarding the violation of victims' rights via the non-prosecution deal. | Court | View |
| 2009-09-01 | N/A | Roy Black notifies USAO of Epstein's application to transfer supervision to Virgin Islands. | Miami, Florida | View |
| 2008-12-04 | N/A | Meeting between Roy Black and the sender of the top email | Unknown | View |
| 2008-08-22 | N/A | Deadline (Friday morning) for Epstein's counsel to advise on client's election regarding victim l... | Unknown | View |
| 2008-08-12 | N/A | Email correspondence regarding the confidentiality of the plea agreement in civil cases. | View | |
| 2008-08-07 | N/A | Email correspondence regarding the potential compelled disclosure of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. | View | |
| 2008-07-30 | N/A | Scheduled phone call between Roy Black and Assistant U.S. Attorney regarding the performance of E... | Phone (Roy Black in Califor... | View |
| 2008-07-30 | N/A | Attempt to schedule a discussion regarding the Epstein matter. | N/A (Discussion proposed) | View |
| 2008-07-30 | N/A | Attempt by US Attorney's office to schedule a discussion with Roy Black regarding the performance... | Correspondence via Email | View |
| 2008-07-30 | N/A | Proposed discussion regarding the Epstein matter and the Non-Prosecution Agreement. | N/A (Discussion proposed vi... | View |
| 2008-07-30 | N/A | Proposed meeting/call to discuss the Epstein matter | Unknown (likely phone) | View |
| 2008-07-30 | N/A | Scheduled call between Assistant U.S. Attorney and Roy Black regarding the Epstein Non-Prosecutio... | Phone (Florida/California) | View |
| 2008-06-27 | N/A | Issuance of a Notice of Non-Compliance via email attachment | West Palm Beach, FL | View |
| 2008-06-26 | N/A | Email correspondence regarding Deferred Prosecution Agreement compliance | N/A | View |
This document contains several newspaper clippings from The Palm Beach Post in late July and early August 2006, detailing Jeffrey Epstein's arrest and indictment for soliciting prostitution. The articles cover his booking, release on bond, his attorney Jack Goldberger's claims of a 'distorted view' from police, and background information on Epstein's properties, social connections, and past legal troubles. The clippings also mention the involvement of State Attorney Barry Krischer and Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter in the case.
This document is a Motion for No-Contact Order filed by Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102 against Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida on May 22, 2009. The plaintiffs argue that despite a state plea agreement prohibiting contact, Epstein's counsel refused to confirm he would not contact federal victims. The filing includes exhibits of correspondence between attorneys and a transcript of the 2008 plea conference where Judge Pucillo explicitly defined 'indirect contact' to include Facebook and MySpace.
This document is a Protective Order designated as Exhibit L (and Exhibit 1) in Case 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON, filed in May 2014. Issued by Judge Kenneth Marra, it grants a motion by Intervenors (led by Roy Black) to keep correspondence between themselves and the United States Attorney's Office confidential ('CDM'). The order establishes strict protocols for the handling, marking, and limited disclosure of these materials during the litigation between Jane Does #1-2 and the United States.
This document is a formal legal letter dated May 15, 2009, from Robert C. Josefsberg of Podhurst Orseck to Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys (Robert Critton and Jack Goldberger). The letter demands the immediate preservation of all evidence, particularly electronically stored information (ESI), relevant to pending civil actions by victims of Epstein's sexual exploitation. It specifically references the Non-Prosecution Agreement, the 2005 FBI raid, and warns that failure to preserve data could result in sanctions for spoliation.
This document is a sworn statement from a former houseman/majordomo who worked for Jeffrey Epstein from 1991 to 2002 at the Palm Beach residence (358 El Brillo). The witness describes Ghislaine Maxwell as his boss and the manager of all Epstein's households. He testifies to the frequent presence of young girls (estimated 16-17 years old) giving massages, the use of sex toys found in the home, and high volumes of towels used daily. The witness also details a recent incident where he was contacted by a private investigator named Paul, hired by Epstein's legal team, who questioned him and advised him regarding his cooperation with the police.
This document is an email chain from October 2020 regarding a privilege review of an Epstein search warrant database ('Epstein SW returns'). The legal team discusses identifying and removing privileged communications involving Epstein's attorneys (specifically Jack Goldberger and 'Marty') and private investigator Roy Black. The emails also clarify that Marc Weinstein and Andrew Tomback represent the estate's co-executors, Darren Indyke and a redacted individual.
This document is a 'Second Supplemental Privilege Log' from the case Jane Doe v. United States, listing internal DOJ, FBI, and USAO communications withheld from civil discovery. The log chronicles the timeline of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation from late 2006 to August 2008, detailing the internal deliberations regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), plea negotiations, and the drafting of the indictment. It reveals critical details such as internal disagreements over plea terms, Epstein's refusal to plead to anything other than 'assault on the plane,' Jay Lefkowitz's admission that he never intended Epstein to register as a sex offender, and the government's struggles with victim notification and harassment by Epstein's defense team.
This document contains an email chain between a partner at Edwards Pottinger LLC and likely federal authorities (SDNY/FBI) from late 2018/early 2019. The correspondence outlines preparations for a new investigation or prosecution, including requests for victim lists beyond those in the original Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). Crucially, it provides a comprehensive list of lawyers who represented Jeffrey Epstein, his pilots, staff, and Ghislaine Maxwell, noting that Bruce Reinhart (now a magistrate judge) represented the pilots and staff.
Letter from attorney Roy Black to an Assistant US Attorney regarding Jeffrey Epstein. Black confirms Epstein's employment location and discusses a newly filed civil RICO lawsuit against Scott Rothstein and Brad Edwards, alleging they used litigation against Epstein to fuel a Ponzi scheme. Black specifically notes that Rothstein sought Epstein's flight logs to 'fish for celebrities to extort' and requests a meeting with the AUSA to discuss Epstein's progress.
This document is an email chain from December 9, 2009, involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA) in West Palm Beach. The AUSA forwards an email received from attorney Roy Black regarding Jeffrey Epstein to colleagues, noting it is unusual that Black contacted them directly rather than a superior named 'Jeff'. The AUSA also mentions receiving a voicemail from attorney Brad Edwards and references a complaint against the 'Rothstein firm'.
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney to Barry Krischer discussing the confidentiality clauses of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement. The sender informs Krischer that Epstein's defense team (Lefkowitz, Black, Goldberger) must be notified before any disclosure, specifically regarding a request or potential lawsuit from the 'Shiny Sheet' (Palm Beach Daily News). The email also notes that the defense has failed to file the complete agreement with the Court as previously ordered.
An email chain from November 24, 2008, involving the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAFLS) and Roy Black, Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorney. Ann Marie Villafana sent a letter to Roy Black, and a subsequent internal email (with redacted participants) asks, 'Wow --- have you heard anything back?', suggesting anticipation regarding Black's response to the attached letter.
This document is an email chain dated December 5, 2008, between attorneys Roy Black, Jay Lefkowitz, and redacted parties. The correspondence discusses Brad Edwards filing the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) in the 'Jane Does v USA' case under seal and subsequently requesting it be unsealed. The sender also thanks Roy Black for a meeting that occurred the previous day.
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Jeffrey Epstein's lawyers, Jay Lefkowitz and Roy Black, dated August 26, 2008. The letter confirms a 'final list' of 32 victims, discusses the logistics of victim notification letters, and demands confirmation of payment for Mr. Josefsberg's fees. It also explicitly warns that if Epstein breaches the Non-Prosecution Agreement, the Office intends to indict him.
An email exchange from July 30, 2008, between attorney Roy Black and an Assistant U.S. Attorney (USAFLS). The AUSA requested a discussion regarding the 'Epstein matter,' to which Roy Black replied that he was out of town and asked for details on the topic.
An email exchange between Epstein's lawyer, Roy Black, and an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Florida from August 2008. Black thanks the prosecutor for agreeing to block the disclosure of Epstein's 2007 plea agreement in civil cases, arguing that civil lawyers would use it to attract more plaintiffs. The AUSA responds briefly, requesting a phone call to discuss a matter.
This document is an email chain dated July 30, 2008, between defense attorney Roy Black and an unnamed Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach office). The AUSA requests a discussion regarding the 'Epstein matter,' specifically clarifying in the final email that it concerns the 'performance of the criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement.' Roy Black indicates he is out of town and asks for the subject of the discussion.
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida to attorney Roy Black regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The letter alleges that Epstein's participation in a work release program constitutes a material breach of his Non-Prosecution Agreement, which required incarceration without community control. The U.S. Attorney demands Epstein withdraw from the program and complete his eighteen-month term of imprisonment as agreed.
This document is an email chain from June 24-25, 2008, involving Assistant U.S. Attorneys and defense lawyers Roy Black and Jack Goldberger. The correspondence confirms the Government's stance that a binding plea agreement with Jeffrey Epstein is signed and requires no modification, while internal emails discuss a '2255 issue' and the upcoming Change of Plea (COP).
This document is an email chain from July 30, 2008, between Assistant U.S. Attorneys (USAFLS) and Roy Black. The correspondence concerns scheduling a discussion regarding the 'Epstein matter,' specifically relating to the 'performance of the Non-Prosecution Agreement.' Roy Black indicates he is out of town and inquires about the subject matter, prompting internal deliberation among the prosecutors on how to respond.
This document contains an email thread between Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Jack Goldberger, and an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida regarding the specific wording of Epstein's plea agreement. The discussion focuses on ensuring the state plea agreement complies with the September 2007 federal non-prosecution agreement (NPA), specifically requesting the insertion of the word 'imprisoned' to describe Epstein's six-month sentence. Goldberger confirms the change is acceptable.
This document is an email thread between Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Jack Goldberger, and an Assistant U.S. Attorney (name redacted) from June 27-28, 2008. The correspondence concerns a 'Notice of Non-Compliance' and negotiations regarding the wording of Epstein's plea agreement, specifically the insertion of the word 'imprisoned' regarding his six-month sentence. The emails confirm a telephone conference where it was agreed that the state plea agreement complied with the federal non-prosecution agreement.
This document is an email thread from June 2008 between Assistant U.S. Attorneys and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Jack Goldberger and Roy Black). The correspondence concerns the finalization of Epstein's plea agreement, specifically clarifying language about his 'imprisonment' versus 'community control' and confirming where he would serve his time (PBC Detention Center/Jail vs. Stockade). The emails reveal that prosecutors were working with '5 girls' for a Grand Jury, that there was surprise regarding a lack of press coverage, and that law enforcement officials ('The Chief') were contacting victims regarding the upcoming plea hearing.
Email exchange between Epstein's defense attorney Roy Black and an Assistant U.S. Attorney regarding the confidentiality of the September 24, 2007 (Non-Prosecution) agreement. Black thanks the AUSA for agreeing to oppose the disclosure of this agreement in civil cases, fearing it would be publicized to attract more plaintiffs. The AUSA requests a copy of the sealed state court filing from co-counsel Jack Goldberger to ensure consistency in documents.
Epstein's attorney Roy Black wrote to Villafaña demanding to know if she had complied with policies before seeking the computer equipment.
Meeting between prosecutors/agents and Epstein's attorney.
A forwarded email with the note 'fyi'. The original message was a 'no comment' response to an inquiry about a 'trump story'.
A forwarded email with the message 'fyi'.
Forwarding a previous email with the note 'fyi'.
Roy Black states 'we have no comment on the trump story' and that his team is finalizing a pleading regarding a plaintiff's remedies. He defers further comment until after the pleading is filed.
Forwarding a response regarding a media inquiry. Body text: 'fyi'.
Declining to comment on a 'trump story' pending the filing of a pleading regarding plaintiff's remedies.
Declining to comment on a 'trump story' and mentioning a pending pleading regarding remedies.
Roy Black states 'we have no comment on the trump story' and informs the recipient that they are finalizing a pleading regarding a plaintiff's position on remedies. He will comment after the pleading is filed.
Privileged - Redacted
Privileged - Redacted
Privileged - Redacted
Privileged - Redacted
Privileged - Redacted
Redacted content (Privileged). Sent from iPhone.
Privileged - Redacted
Redacted content (Privileged).
Discussing Epstein's employment location, the Rothstein Ponzi scheme, and requesting a meeting.
Sending attached letter regarding Jeffrey Epstein; original to arrive via FedEx.
Asking whether Jeffrey Epstein's place of employment remained constant.
Notification that Epstein is applying to transfer his community control supervision from Florida to the Virgin Islands via ICAOS.
Thanking for meeting yesterday.
Thanks for the notice.
Dear Roy: Please review the attached letter. Thank you.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity