EFTA00032085.pdf
67.9 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email thread
File Size:
67.9 KB
Summary
Internal email thread from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York dated July 22, 2020. The discussion concerns a call from 'Brad' (victims' counsel) regarding a defense motion, with the US Attorney's office maintaining a position of neutrality on whether victims' counsel should file a response. The thread concludes with the circulation of a draft letter to Judge Nathan regarding Local Rule 23.1 (likely related to the Ghislaine Maxwell case based on the 'GM' filename) for review by senior leadership ('the Brass').
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brad | Victims' counsel |
Called the US Attorney's office to ask if they had a view on whether victims' counsel should file a response to a def...
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Named in the file attachment: 2020-07-22,_GM_letter_to_Judge_Nathan_re_Local_Rule_23.1_v2.docx
|
| Assistant U.S. Attorney (Redacted) | Assistant U.S. Attorney |
Sender of the initial email regarding the call from Brad.
|
| The Brass | Senior Leadership |
Senior officials at the US Attorney's office who needed to review the draft.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USANYS |
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (email domain/signature).
|
|
| Southern District of New York |
Jurisdiction mentioned in signature.
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the US Attorney's Office.
|
Key Quotes (3)
"Brad just called and asked if we had a view as to whether victims’ counsel should file a response to the defense motion from last night."Source
EFTA00032085.pdf
Quote #1
"I said my assumption was that we had no position or view at all with respect to what victims’ counsel should or should not do"Source
EFTA00032085.pdf
Quote #2
"I really want to get this up to the Brass tonight."Source
EFTA00032085.pdf
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,162 characters)
From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS)" <[REDACTED]>, "[REDACTED]
Cc: "[REDACTED] (USANYS)" <[REDACTED]>, "[REDACTED]
Subject: RE: Rule 23 motion
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 22:21:29 +0000
Attachments: 2020-07-22,_GM_letter_to_Judge_Nathan_re_Local_Rule_23.1_v2.docx
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS)" <[REDACTED]>, "[REDACTED]
Cc: "[REDACTED] (USANYS)" <[REDACTED]>, "[REDACTED]
Subject: RE: Rule 23 motion
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 22:21:29 +0000
Attachments: 2020-07-22,_GM_letter_to_Judge_Nathan_re_Local_Rule_23.1_v2.docx
Very sorry for the delay—I've lost count of how many times I've had to restart my computer today. Attached is the draft in its current form.
From: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 6:18 PM
To: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: Rule 23 motion
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 6:18 PM
To: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: Rule 23 motion
Okay, thanks. On the draft, if someone could just send me whatever you have at whatever stage it is now, I'll take it from here as I really want to get this up to the Brass tonight. Thanks
From: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 5:59 PM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: Rule 23 motion
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 5:59 PM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: Rule 23 motion
Perfect, and I did – I mentioned we'd be filing a response in the next day or so.
From: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 17:57
To: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED]
Subject: Re: Rule 23 motion
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 17:57
To: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED]
Subject: Re: Rule 23 motion
I think no position is right, although I think you can tell him we plan to file something in response soon. Speaking of, what is the status of the draft?
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 22, 2020, at 3:58 PM, [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]> wrote:
Just FYI for everyone, Brad just called and asked if we had a view as to whether victims’ counsel should file a response to the defense motion from last night. I said my assumption was that we had no position or view at all with respect to what victims’ counsel should or should not do, and wouldn’t direct victim counsel on something like that, but that I would let him know if that was incorrect. So please let me know if we should convey something else, and I’m happy to pass it along, otherwise I’ve conveyed our neutrality.
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Southern District of New York
[REDACTED]
EFTA00032085
EFTA00032086
Southern District of New York
[REDACTED]
EFTA00032085
EFTA00032086
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document