| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Special Agent (Redacted)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Roy Black
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jay Lefkowitz
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Marc A. Weinstein
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Ted
|
Professional social |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Anjan Sahni
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Steve D'Allessandro
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein (Case)
|
Prosecutor investigator |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
REID WEINGARTEN
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Agents/Team Members (Redacted)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Legal Assistant, Public Corruption (Redacted)
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Legal Assistant (Redacted)
|
Professional administrative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Bachner
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Stan Pottinger
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Elizabeth Clark Tarbert
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Recipient
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Recipient
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew Tomback
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Co-Chief, Money Laundering Unit (Redacted)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Approver (Redacted)
|
Professional hierarchical |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Alex Acosta
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Technical Support Staff (Redacted)
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Respondent
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-19 | N/A | Witness interview for Epstein investigation (2018R01618) | Pensacola, Florida (Hilton ... | View |
| 2020-01-29 | N/A | Interview near Stockholm for Epstein investigation (2018R01618) | Stockholm, Sweden | View |
| 2019-12-16 | N/A | Interview in Los Angeles for Epstein investigation | Los Angeles, CA | View |
| 2019-12-15 | N/A | Travel to Santa Monica/Los Angeles for witness interviews. | Los Angeles, CA; DoubleTree... | View |
| 2019-11-08 | N/A | Discussion of news article regarding a brewery printing 'Epstein didn't kill himself' on beer cans. | Email Correspondence | View |
| 2019-11-07 | N/A | Discussion of news article regarding an airport paging system being used to broadcast an Epstein ... | Email Correspondence | View |
| 2019-11-04 | N/A | Interview in West Palm Beach for Epstein investigation | West Palm Beach, FL | View |
| 2019-03-20 | N/A | Meetings and interviews for United States v. Epstein | West Palm Beach / Fort Laud... | View |
Internal email thread from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York dated July 22, 2020. The discussion concerns a call from 'Brad' (victims' counsel) regarding a defense motion, with the US Attorney's office maintaining a position of neutrality on whether victims' counsel should file a response. The thread concludes with the circulation of a draft letter to Judge Nathan regarding Local Rule 23.1 (likely related to the Ghislaine Maxwell case based on the 'GM' filename) for review by senior leadership ('the Brass').
This document contains a chain of emails between the FBI's NY CART team and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the technical processing of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the Virgin Islands. The correspondence highlights significant technical challenges, including the incompatibility of forensic data with the 'Relativity' review platform, the massive volume of data (terabytes), and delays caused by FBI network upgrades and COVID-19 remote work. The US Attorney's office expresses frustration with the organization of the data, specifically requesting better linkage between emails and attachments and clearer identification of seized devices by serial number.
Shared a link to a Miami New Times article about Julie Brown and Mike Fisten.
Documentation of email review process, moving 160 emails, accidental duplication of 140 emails, and deletion of duplicates consistent with litigation hold.
Do not believe there is a de-dupe option.
Inquiry about how to remove duplicate emails created after moving files to a new folder.
Request to schedule a meet and confer regarding a protective order and discovery production logistics.
Follow up on recent discussions, attaching a letter from the Office.
Confirming plan to scan photographs from NY residence, discussing loose discs, and addressing attorney-client privilege regarding the Epstein estate in US v. Maxwell.
Confirming receipt of previous email and promising to revert back.
Proposing a limited 2-week 'Negotiation Period' (July 14-28) to arrange a confidential voluntary interview.
Complaining about public comments by Geoffrey Berman and Audrey Strauss; requesting an undertaking of confidentiality regarding interview arrangements.
Reiterating demand for a voluntary interview; refusing to stop standard public comments; threatening compelled interview; denying leaks.
Sender attaches a proposed protective order and notes that once finalized by the Court, discovery productions can begin shortly.
Update regarding a call received about a female subject willing to meet with prosecutors in West Palm or via Zoom.
Discussing 'cultural differences' in legal practice; criticizing DOJ's lack of response; discussing MLAT process versus voluntary cooperation; complaining about media leaks.
Stating nothing is under consideration because Bloxsome proposed nothing; criticizing Bloxsome's June 8 public release; demanding a date for the interview.
Chasing for a response to an email dated June 8th; requesting a telephone conference.
Attached is a draft press release for the Maxwell arrest – hopefully for tomorrow or Thursday at the latest. Happy to incorporate any edits.
Requesting the recipient to put an attached subpoena in the mail.
Discussion regarding BRG involvement and the transfer of a 12TB hard drive. Mentions the total data seized is around 40-50 TB.
Inquiry to colleagues about work pressure from 'chiefs' regarding memos. Specifically mentions 'near-daily prodding' on the Epstein case despite 'circumstances of the world' (COVID-19).
Discussing work-from-home tech issues, lack of progress on data organization, inability to link attachments to emails, and request for CART assistance.
Checking on status of taint review and well-being.
Comparing the data dump to 100,000 filing cabinets dumped in a pile; issues with separated attachments.
FYI, attached, per our usual practice.
Detailed complaint: Excel file descriptions don't match returns, missing CART numbers, inability to link emails to attachments (specifically mentioning flight records as an example of unlinked data).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity