DOJ-OGR-00005181.jpg
535 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
535 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on October 12, 2021, is part of a case against a defendant named Maxwell. The author argues that the United States government is misapplying the statute of limitations (18 USC § 3283) in Maxwell's case, drawing a parallel to a previous case, United States v. Diehl. The document notes that Diehl has since filed a 'fraud on the court' motion against the government for similar alleged misconduct.
People (2)
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States | government agency |
Party in the legal case United States V. Diehl and accused of knowingly misapplying 18 USC § 3283.
|
| Western district of Texas | government agency |
The court where Diehl has filed a Rule 60(d)(3) motion.
|
| 5th Cir. | government agency |
The circuit court that heard the appeal in United States V. Diehl, 775 F.3d 714 (5th Cir. 2015).
|
Timeline (3 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where Diehl filed a 'fraud on the court' motion.
|
Relationships (2)
The document cites the case 'United States V. Diehl' and states Diehl accused the United States of 'knowingly misapplying' a statute and filed a 'fraud on the court' motion against them.
The document refers to 'defendant Maxwell's charges' and alleges the United States is misapplying a statute of limitations in their case.
Key Quotes (1)
"The United States continues to knowingly misapply §3283 and does so again in the above styled cause."Source
— Author of the document
(Concluding statement of the 'Interest' section, accusing the government of ongoing misconduct in the current case.)
DOJ-OGR-00005181.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,008 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 338 Filed 10/12/21 Page 3 of 22
Interest.
In the above cause the court considers whether or not the Statute of Limitations at 18 USC § 3283 applies to defendant Maxwell's charges. Diehl faced this same issue on appeal. See United States V. Diehl, 775 F.3d 714 (5th Cir. 2015). The fact is the issue should not have been heard in the first instance on appeal, because Diehl had shown substantial evidence indicating that the United States was knowingly misapplying 18 USC §3283, and requested an investigation referencing highly suspect facts. Since that time, extensive investigation into §3283's legislative history shows what its true purpose was. See the enclosed brief.
Diehl has currently filed with the Western district of Texas, a Rule 60(d)(3) - fraud on the court motion, with regard to the United States fraudulent misapplication of § 3283.
The United States continues to knowingly misapply §3283 and does so again in the above styled cause.
3
DOJ-OGR-00005181
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document