Event Details

This legal document, filed on October 12, 2021, is part of a case against a defendant named Maxwell. The author argues that the United States government is misapplying the statute of limitations (18 USC § 3283) in Maxwell's case, drawing a parallel to a previous case, United States v. Diehl. The document notes that Diehl has since filed a 'fraud on the court' motion against the government for similar alleged misconduct.

This document is a handwritten legal argument filed in court on October 12, 2021, challenging a court's interpretation of statute §3283. The author argues that the statute's legislative history, originating from the 1986 Sexual Abuse Act, demonstrates its narrow purpose is for sexual assault and related offenses, not a broader application. The argument cites several legal cases (Davis, Pledges, Bridges) to contend that the court's findings are 'patently wrong'.

This document is a single handwritten page (page 2 of 22) from a court filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 12, 2021. It contains a statement asserting that an individual named Diehl's request to intervene will not prejudice the case and that Diehl has no further interest in the matter. The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp.