HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023232.jpg

2.84 MB

Extraction Summary

9
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email correspondence / printed document
File Size: 2.84 MB
Summary

This document is a printed email (dated Jan 29, 2016) seemingly from Jeffrey Epstein to Melanie Spinella (likely an intermediary for a high-net-worth individual, possibly Leon Black given the context of 'Athene', 'Phaidon', and 'Brad Karp'). The sender aggressively critiques the recipient's family office management, specifically a CEO named Brad, citing accounting errors and missing documentation. The sender disputes a payment of $20 million, claiming an agreement of 37% was established, and references 'Athene or Rothschild' transactions.

People (9)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey Epstein Sender (Implied)
Author of the email, demanding fees, critiquing the recipient's staff and financial management.
Melanie Spinella Recipient
Addressee of the email (likely an assistant or intermediary for the actual principal being addressed).
Brad Karp Lawyer/Advisor
Mentioned in the context of setting up a meeting and discussing payments ('telling me that you and Brad Karp talked').
Brad CEO
CEO of the recipient's office/estate. Heavily criticized by the sender for incompetence, bad documents, and cash flow...
Tom Employee/Associate
Someone the sender reminded the recipient to bring in; knows little of transactions except overview.
Barry Cohen Associate
Praised by the sender ('Barry Cohen is great').
Richard Associate/Advisor
Sender tells recipient to 'Talk to richard yourself' regarding the CEO's excuses.
Alan Legal/Estate Advisor
Mentioned in relation to estate structure ('tenants in common structure I assume Alan has carefully walked you throug...
Castrucci Former Employee
Mentioned as a bad hire the sender warned against ('when you hired Castrucci... when you fired him').

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Athene
Mentioned in relation to a transaction and fee dispute.
Rothschild
Mentioned in relation to a transaction and fee dispute.
Phaidon
Mentioned as an investment or business interest ('pahidon', 'phaidon').
House Oversight Committee
Source of the document (footer).

Timeline (1 events)

Weekend following Jan 29, 2016
Proposed discussion
Phone/In-person
Sender Recipient

Relationships (3)

Jeffrey Epstein Professional/Adversarial Brad Karp
Epstein wants to send Karp an email; mentions Karp talked to the principal regarding fees.
Jeffrey Epstein Financial/Advisory Recipient (Principal)
Discusses 'biz /pay relationship', 'friendship', and oversight of 'multi billion dollar responsibility'.
Recipient (Principal) Employer/Employee Brad (CEO)
Referred to as 'your ceo ( Brad)'.

Key Quotes (5)

"I believe the decision re only paying 20 m has frankly , left me felling quite uneasy."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023232.jpg
Quote #1
"37 percent was our number"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023232.jpg
Quote #2
"Your office is a multi billion dollar responsibility."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023232.jpg
Quote #3
"being weaned of our biz /pay realtionship has been our mutual goal."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023232.jpg
Quote #4
"the equivalent of your art consultant pointing to a picasso and calling it a renoir."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023232.jpg
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (3,993 characters)

you I and Brad karp sit together if you think it would be helpful. . I would like to send him this email, with your consent of course. If the transactions were never consummated , i would not be owed a dime, however , the expected fee was known up front. , the detailed step by step plan was followed and overseen by me, the amount that I had requested before the transaction had even begun, had already been heavily discounted, out of friendship, . I believe the decision re only paying 20 m has frankly , left me felling quite uneasy. and colors the view about the Athene or Rothschild transaction.
Date: Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 2:39 PM
Subject:
To: Melanie Spinella <[REDACTED]>
you've agreed that
Your office is a multi billion dollar responsibility. your children will inherit it , in order to oversee their financial lives- I feel for you, truly ,but the facts are the facts, your ceo ( Brad) has provided one bad document after another for over a year , no getting away from it, , bad cash flows no new IT, each time with " its gettting better " no in fact -! its not. - the excuse, that Brad is not the numbers guy, is ludicrous. of course he didnt actually prepare the statements. - no ceo would ,- but over and over he presented them to you and me , after , holding them back for his personal review multiple times and after multiple drafts. weeks of his editing, the consistant but "inexplicable "missing the obvious serious errors . ( gaming ) inaccuracies, ( cashflow ) and mistakes (tax returns). why, ?! the simple answer is that at best, he is a c minus, (note. I, like you ,also give points for effort. )- ! an elegant art partnership gone fallow. ??!!I and its core reason to exist. not used ? no docs for plane?, still ! why? no docs for decantings why? the docs for deal 1 received last night , " no docs at all for deal 2, the biggest " . why wasn't Tom brought in , after 4 times of my incessant reminders i spoke to him , he knows little of either transaction except for over view. never saw pahidon anything except projections until yesterday ? ?and this after your clear admonition etc. re the trading accounts no activity, at all,
Barry Cohen is great. more like him please .
you asked , - I did my best trying to train your brad chosen people in the face of my telling you that they were never going to be more than c-minuses, thousands of emails thousands ? Brad at its head . you can't as a ceo, have an accountant give you multiple pages with the most important numbers missing altogether and not notice, you and I saw the errrors right away ,as did my very junior bookeeper after only a cursory glance. He told me he didnt know the details of his note? ! , my guess is that he wanted to pay less. no more than that, any other story is blather. its silly. Talk to richard yourself.
re your estate. Yes another Brad issue - your will, needs revision. the tenants in common structure I assume Alan has carefully walked you through. it is way overdue, needed and exciting. I won't list the more serious issues in an email but we can speak over the weekend.
How can I help? We agreed at the time when you hired Castrucci , that when you fired him, I would bear no responsibility because it was clear that he shouldnt be hired. brad and you both said ," its on us", but... the equivalent of your art consultant pointing to a picasso and calling it a renoir. then a brancusi and calling it a michaelangelo. those were the types of erros that i saw immediatily, you said give them more time. at least they saw it was a painting and not a photo?
being weaned of our biz /pay realtionship has been our mutual goal. However since novemebr, you chose to do so by ignoring' our agreement re, phaidon,and your oft stated commitment to me of large payments for large value, ( 37 percent was our number ). chose to pay me a number picked by what appears to be only by whim,- have yet to justify it except for telling me that you and Brad Karp talked..
.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023232

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document