| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
narrator
|
Romantic |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
narrator
|
Business associate |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
NSA
|
Employee |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
narrator
|
Complex abusive bdsm |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Beudert-Richard
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
narrator
|
Sexual complex |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
narrator
|
Sexual bdsm |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Author
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Clarisse Thorn
|
Sexual bdsm |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
narrator
|
Sexual bdsm |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
narrator
|
Sexual tense |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Clarisse Thorn
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
NSA
|
Employment leadership |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Edward Snowden
|
Investigator subject |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Brad
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bryan Burroughs
|
Interviewer interviewee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Chris Inglis
|
Successor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
narrator
|
Intimate sexual |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
narrator
|
Sexual power dynamic |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
narrator
|
Sexual intimate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The Narrator
|
Abusive complex bdsm |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
narrator
|
Complex dependent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew Tilghman
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | NSA damage assessment conducted by Ledgett. | NSA Headquarters (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Physical encounter with Richard involving restraint and emotional release. | Unknown (Bedroom implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Walking home from the waterfront to an intersection where narrator and Richard parted ways. | Near waterfront/intersection | View |
| N/A | N/A | Outdoor party where narrator's relationship with Richard began. | Outdoor party | View |
| N/A | N/A | Outdoor party where the narrator was drunk and Richard bit her arm and pulled her hair; a friend ... | Outdoor party | View |
| N/A | N/A | Outdoor party where the narrator was drunk and Richard engaged in rough physical play (biting, sc... | Outdoor party | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conversation in bedroom regarding why they enjoy S&M/pain. | Richard's bedroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual encounter involving restraint ('pinned me down') and roleplay with Richard. | Bedroom (implied by 'pillow') | View |
| N/A | N/A | An incident where the narrator asked to be let up, and felt the male subject didn't believe her. | Unspecified (likely Richard... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Narrator crying in Richard's bed; Richard bringing water and listening. | Richard's bed | View |
| N/A | N/A | A period of hazy anger and fascination while Richard remained occupied. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Narrator went to Richard's place, cried, and slept over without sexual activity. | Richard's home | View |
| N/A | N/A | Richard was away for most of the summer. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Richard visited Chicago and called the narrator nightly. | Chicago | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conversation in Richard's bedroom regarding why they engage in sadomasochism. | Richard's bedroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | An incident at an outdoor party where the narrator was drunk and Richard engaged in rough physica... | Outdoor party | View |
| N/A | N/A | A conversation between the narrator and Richard regarding why he likes to hurt people and why she... | Richard's bed | View |
| N/A | N/A | Physical/BDSM encounter between the narrator and Richard involving restraint and a safe word disc... | Bedroom (implied by 'pillow') | View |
| N/A | N/A | A sexual encounter involving dominance/submission that left the narrator confused. | Richard's bed | View |
| N/A | N/A | Morning after discussion where Richard was kind but non-committal about future meetings. | Richard's residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Richard was away for most of the summer; visited Chicago. | Chicago | View |
| N/A | N/A | Physical encounter resulting in bruises, bleeding, and scars. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Walking back from the waterfront and parting ways at an intersection. | Intersection near apartments | View |
| N/A | N/A | Outdoor party where Narrator and Richard's relationship started. | Outdoor party | View |
| N/A | N/A | Walking back from the waterfront to the intersection where they lived. | Waterfront / Street Interse... | View |
This document is page 320 from a book (identified by ISBN as 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein), containing endnotes for pages 159-171. The text consists of citations for sources regarding Edward Snowden, espionage, the NSA, and Russian intelligence, dating primarily between 2012 and 2015. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was produced as part of a congressional investigation, likely due to the author's surname matching Jeffrey Epstein or relevance to intelligence oversight.
This document is a page of endnotes (p. 318) from a book authored by Edward Jay Epstein, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets'. The notes provide citations for Chapter 14, 'The Crime Scene Investigation,' detailing sources related to Edward Snowden, the NSA, James Clapper, and comparisons to Lee Harvey Oswald. The page is stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019806', indicating it was part of a document production for the House Oversight Committee.
This document is a page of endnotes (page 310) from a book discussing Edward Snowden, listing sources and citations for Chapter 4 ("Thief") and Chapter 5 ("Crossing the Rubicon"). It references interviews, articles, and transcripts involving Snowden, government officials, and journalists.
This document appears to be page 298 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (likely by Edward Jay Epstein, indicated by the filename 'Epst_...'). It details the operational fallout of the Edward Snowden leaks, specifically how terrorist targets using platforms like Xbox Live, Twitter, and Facebook ceased using these methods ('went dark') after the PRISM program was revealed in June 2013. The text cites NSA officials Richard Ledgett and Admiral Rogers confirming that the leaks resulted in a loss of surveillance capabilities against groups planning attacks in Europe and the US.
This document discusses the aftermath of the Snowden leaks, focusing on documents released after Snowden left Hong Kong, particularly regarding the alleged surveillance of German Chancellor Angela Merkel. It details the intelligence community's suspicion that hostile parties like Russia or China may have gained access to sensitive NSA "Level 3" documents, potentially compromising U.S. espionage capabilities.
This document appears to be page 169 from a book (Chapter 17: 'The Keys to the Kingdom Are Missing') discussing Edward Snowden and the NSA leak. It references journalist Greenwald describing the stolen documents as an 'instruction manual' for the NSA, and NSA official Ledgett confirming the loss of the 'keys to the kingdom.' The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, suggesting it was used as an exhibit in a congressional investigation. Note: The file slug 'Epst' refers to the author Edward Jay Epstein (author of 'How America Lost Its Secrets'), not Jeffrey Epstein.
This page from a book titled "How America Lost Its Secrets" details the logistics of how NSA documents stolen by Edward Snowden were transported between journalists Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras via David Miranda, leading to the NSA obtaining a copy during Miranda's detention at Heathrow. It further analyzes the timeline of Snowden's theft, noting that he downloaded documents for nine months before acquiring the specific whistle-blowing materials (like the Verizon order and PRISM presentation) released to the media, suggesting his initial motives may have differed from his public claims.
This document is page 138 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets', included in an evidentiary production (likely House Oversight regarding Epstein, based on the file name 'Epst...' and Bates stamp). The text details the investigation into Edward Snowden's theft of NSA and CIA data, describing the panic within the NSA, the timeline of the theft beginning in mid-April, and the volume of data compromised (1.7 million documents). It mentions key figures including Chris Inglis and Rick Ledgett.
This document appears to be page 45 from a book (identified by the filename 'Epst_9780451494566' as Edward Jay Epstein's *How America Lost Its Secrets*) stamped as a House Oversight exhibit. The text details how Edward Snowden exploited a lack of auditing software at the NSA's Kunia base in Hawaii to steal classified data while working for Dell in 2012. It explains that post-9/11 reforms to eliminate 'stovepiping' created a shared network (NSANet) that allowed system administrators like Snowden access to CIA and Defense Department documents without detection.
This document is page 44 from a book (likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein, based on the filename/ISBN) included in a House Oversight Committee production. It details Edward Snowden's activities in late 2012, specifically how he used his position as a Dell contractor to transfer files from Fort Meade to Hawaii. The text explains that this authorized transfer provided 'perfect cover' for him to steal unencrypted NSA data by exploiting security flaws he had previously identified in Japan.
This document is a House Oversight report page (ID 019207) detailing the damage assessment of Edward Snowden's data theft. It contradicts Snowden's narrative, stating he took 1.5 million documents—mostly military secrets rather than whistleblower evidence—including 'Level 3' NSA tools and a 'road map' of global surveillance targets. The report outlines his movement from Hong Kong to Moscow and cites testimony from Gen. Martin Dempsey and NSA executive Richard Ledgett regarding the severity of the intelligence compromise.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript, diary, or personal narrative (marked as House Oversight evidence) describing a summer birthday in Chicago. The narrator recounts an evening with her partner, 'Mr. Ambition,' and a tense but intimate encounter with a former flame named Richard, whom she describes as untrustworthy and complicated. The text explores the emotional dynamics between the three characters.
This document is a chain of emails from October 2015, likely written by Jeffrey Epstein to Melanie Spinella (assistant to Leon Black). The sender aggressively critiques the recipient's family office ('Elysium'), suggesting a 'heart operation' to restart it from scratch due to incompetence, poor IT, and financial mismanagement. The text details specific financial disputes, including a $2 million payment to the sender and a $5 million foundation contribution, while discussing assets like Apollo stock, Phaidon publishing, a private plane (partially owned by 'Debra'), and various staff members.
This document is a contentious memo or email draft, likely from Jeffrey Epstein to Leon Black (inferred from family names and business entities like Phaidon/Apollo). The text begins with urgent estate planning and financial advice, suggesting specific executors (Suydam), trust changes, and tax strategies. The second half shifts to a dispute over advisory fees; Epstein claims he was promised $50-60 million for a transaction but was later told by lawyer Brad Karp he would only receive $20 million, a reduction he finds 'remarkably unfair' given his detailed work and their close friendship.
This document appears to be a draft memo or email from Jeffrey Epstein to Leon Black (implied by context of family names and business deals). It outlines a series of estate planning and financial directives, including restructuring trusts, wills, and business assets like Phaidon and Artspace. The second half of the document is a grievance regarding unpaid consulting fees, where Epstein claims he was promised $50-60 million for his services but was ultimately offered only $20 million, expressing that this breach of agreement has left him 'uneasy' despite their close friendship.
This document contains a series of emails, culminating on October 26, 2015, from Jeffrey Epstein (implied by context and tone) to Melanie Spinella and Brad Wechsler. The emails aggressively advise on the restructuring of Leon Black's family office ('Elysium'), recommending the firing of almost all staff except Heather, selling the publishing company Phaidon, and addressing significant financial issues regarding a private jet and art loans. Epstein criticizes the current management as a 'failed experiment' and a 'mess,' specifically mentioning Leon Black's decisions and suggesting Brad Wechsler replace a manager named Richard.
This document is a printed email (dated Jan 29, 2016) seemingly from Jeffrey Epstein to Melanie Spinella (likely an intermediary for a high-net-worth individual, possibly Leon Black given the context of 'Athene', 'Phaidon', and 'Brad Karp'). The sender aggressively critiques the recipient's family office management, specifically a CEO named Brad, citing accounting errors and missing documentation. The sender disputes a payment of $20 million, claiming an agreement of 37% was established, and references 'Athene or Rothschild' transactions.
This document contains an email thread (likely a draft forwarded to himself by Jeffrey Epstein) addressed to Leon Black regarding a dispute over financial compensation for complex tax and estate planning services. The writer expresses frustration that an agreed-upon fee range of 50-60 million was reduced to 20 million despite saving the recipient over 600 million in taxes.
This document is a printed email from a close associate (likely a financial advisor) to Jeffrey Epstein, expressing deep frustration over a fee dispute regarding a tax strategy that allegedly saved Epstein $600 million. The sender criticizes Epstein's staff, specifically Eileen Alexandersson and Brad Wechsler, for incompetence and mismanagement, while reminding Epstein of verbal and written agreements regarding compensation that Epstein has allegedly ignored. The email highlights the tension between their personal friendship and their professional financial dealings.
A letter, likely from Jeffrey Epstein to Leon Black (inferred from context regarding family and business holdings), critiquing Black's financial management and staff. The author advises on estate planning, including trusts (GRATs), wills, and executor appointments, while highlighting significant financial mismanagement in entities like Regan Arts and Artspace. The letter also details a dispute over advisory fees regarding a 'Phaidon payout' and mentions a complex tax issue involving 'Rowen' (Marc Rowan) and 'Athene' potentially involving 2 billion in taxes.
This document contains a chain of emails from November 2015 involving Jeffrey Epstein, Melanie Spinella, and an unidentified advisor (likely legal or financial). The emails discuss significant financial matters, including a suspicious $100 million overseas transfer involving Gagosian without a contract, high-interest loans costing $50k/day, estate planning, and trust management with Bank of America. The sender also expresses strong opinions on staffing (suggesting Ada Clapp should be fired) and mentions FBI involvement in a list of agenda items.
This document appears to be page 145 of a House Oversight Committee report discussing the intelligence fallout from Edward Snowden's leaks. It details the impact on US foreign relations (specifically with Germany regarding Chancellor Merkel's phone), the potential sharing of 'Level 3' NSA documents with Russia and China, and the resulting loss of US and British intelligence capabilities in monitoring adversaries. Note: While the user requested an 'Epstein-related' analysis, this specific page contains no references to Jeffrey Epstein or his network; it is entirely focused on national security and the Snowden affair.
This document is a page from a House Oversight report (Bates stamp 020288) detailing the intelligence leaks attributed to Edward Snowden. It discusses the logistics of how documents were transferred between Snowden, Laura Poitras, and Glenn Greenwald, including the interception of a courier at Heathrow. The text analyzes the potential damage of specific missing documents, particularly 'level 3' lists concerning Russia and China, and questions whether Snowden took these files to Moscow. Note: While the user prompt requested Epstein-related data, this specific page is exclusively focused on the Snowden/NSA leaks.
This document is a page from a report or narrative (marked House Oversight) detailing the NSA's damage assessment regarding Edward Snowden. It analyzes the volume of data stolen (estimated at 1.7 million touched / 1.3 million copied) during his time at Booz Allen and Dell, while noting disputes from Snowden and journalists Greenwald and Bamford regarding these numbers. The text discusses the potential motivations of the NSA Damage Assessment team under Ledgett and the legal implications of the leaks.
This document is page 134, 'Chapter Seventeen,' likely from a book or report regarding Edward Snowden (possibly 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein). It discusses the 'Snowden enigma,' specifically the disparity between the number of NSA documents compromised versus those handed to journalists. It references comments by Glenn Greenwald and NSA official Ledgett regarding the 'keys to the kingdom'—documents that reveal the core mechanisms of U.S. surveillance. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer.
Quote: 'A lot of crap comes out when you do this stuff.'
He smiled, said to email him, that we'd work something out.
Called every night for a week.
Discussion about whether the narrator is happy with the current situation and what they want from it.
Narrator explaining they are still figuring out how they feel about Richard while walking on the waterfront.
Richard asks why she wants to be hurt; she asks why he likes to hurt people. He responds, 'That's a long, dark road.'
"Beg for mercy," he said softly.
He smiled, said to email him, that we'd work something out.
He called the narrator every night for a week.
Richard asks 'Are you happy with the way we are now?' and discusses the situation being 'healthier'.
Emailed him straightforwardly to initiate a meeting.
Narrator emailed him 'straightforwardly' to pursue him.
Richard asks if narrator is okay after she cries; asks if she wants to sleep over.
Exchange of pleasantries, teasing about forgetting the birthday, and a request to call.
"A lot of crap comes out when you do this stuff."
"You shouldn't do that."
"It's okay... she likes it"
"That's a long, dark road"
Richard told narrator to email him and they would work something out.
He called every night for a week.
Towards the end of one night... Richard inquired (sentence cuts off).
Richard asks 'Are you happy with the way we are now?' and discusses the situation being 'healthier'.
"A lot of crap comes out when you do this stuff."
Used doublespeak and icy tones to deflect interest.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity