HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029944.jpg
2.62 MB
Extraction Summary
0
People
5
Organizations
5
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Political proposal / position paper (page 13)
File Size:
2.62 MB
Summary
This document appears to be page 13 of a political position paper or proposal found within House Oversight files (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029944). The text argues against the 'defunct two state solution' for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and proposes a 'one democratic state' solution. It calls for the UN General Assembly to rescind the 1947 Resolution 181 and criticizes the US for using its veto power in the Security Council to protect Israel. While found in files related to the investigation (potentially Epstein-related contextually), the text itself is a geopolitical analysis without specific mentions of Epstein or his known associates.
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| UN General Assembly |
Passed Resolution 181; proposed body to rescind resolution and create new one
|
|
| UN Security Council |
Described as ineffective due to US veto power
|
|
| State of Israel |
Created via legitimacy from Resolution 181; accused of human rights violations
|
|
| PA (Palestinian Authority) |
Accused of human rights violations alongside Israel
|
|
| US (United States) |
Mentioned regarding exercise of veto power to protect Israel
|
Timeline (3 events)
Locations (5)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Historic region; subject of the two-state vs one-state proposal
|
|
|
Proposed for international status in 1947
|
|
|
State created following Resolution 181
|
|
|
Location of the signing of the Oslo Accords in 1993
|
|
|
Region requiring a 'new beginning'
|
Relationships (1)
Text mentions 'constant exercise by the US of its veto power to protect Israel against condemnations'
Key Quotes (3)
"We propose that neutral member states should ask the UN General Assembly to rescind Resolution 181 and to request a new resolution for the establishment of one state in historic Palestine."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029944.jpg
Quote #1
"Except for a few euphoric, but short-lived moments, not the slightest progress has been made towards granting the Palestinians statehood, and all attempts to establish two states have failed."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029944.jpg
Quote #2
"A resolution for establishing one democratic state in historic Palestine will include as citizens all those who live there and all Palestinians in the Diaspora..."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029944.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,048 characters)
13
Whereas the defunct two state solution was proposed in 1947, when the UN General Assembly passed Resolution 181 calling for dividing historic Palestine into two entities and for granting Jerusalem an international status, the reversal of this resolution by the Assembly is imperative. Although not legally binding, this resolution did grant legitimacy to the creation of the State of Israel. Ironically, since that resolution, there was no serious discussion concerning the establishment of two states in Palestine until the 1991 Madrid Conference and the signing of the Oslo Accords (Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements) in Washington in 1993. Except for a few euphoric, but short-lived moments, not the slightest progress has been made towards granting the Palestinians statehood, and all attempts to establish two states have failed.
We propose that neutral member states should ask the UN General Assembly to rescind Resolution 181 and to request a new resolution for the establishment of one state in historic Palestine. Although this responsibility falls under the Security Council, the constant exercise by the US of its veto power to protect Israel against condemnations and sanctions has proven the council's ineffectiveness in dealing objectively with the Arab-Israeli conflict.
At the General Assembly, each state has an equal voting right, thus lending legitimacy to passed resolutions. In its deliberations, the Assembly should also address international law and human rights violations committed by Israel, the PA, and neighbouring states against the Palestinian people, and set a course for a new beginning in the Middle East through major shifts in the paradigms that have crippled the region for decades.
A resolution for establishing one democratic state in historic Palestine will include as citizens all those who live there and all Palestinians in the Diaspora, reaffirming Palestinian refugees right to return, and acknowledging the special place that Palestine is for
We propose that neutral member states should ask the UN General Assembly to rescind Resolution 181 and to request a new resolution for the establishment of one state in historic Palestine. Although this responsibility falls under the Security Council, the constant exercise by the US of its veto power to protect Israel against condemnations and sanctions has proven the council's ineffectiveness in dealing objectively with the Arab-Israeli conflict.
At the General Assembly, each state has an equal voting right, thus lending legitimacy to passed resolutions. In its deliberations, the Assembly should also address international law and human rights violations committed by Israel, the PA, and neighbouring states against the Palestinian people, and set a course for a new beginning in the Middle East through major shifts in the paradigms that have crippled the region for decades.
A resolution for establishing one democratic state in historic Palestine will include as citizens all those who live there and all Palestinians in the Diaspora, reaffirming Palestinian refugees right to return, and acknowledging the special place that Palestine is for
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029944
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document