Washington, D.C.
LocationRelationship Network
019.pdf
This document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on June 30, 2023, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. Attorney John McNichols of Williams & Connolly LLP seeks permission to represent defendant James Edward Staley in the case 'Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund v. James Dimon et al.', which names numerous JPMorgan Chase executives and board members as defendants.
019-02.pdf
This document is a Certificate of Good Standing issued by the District of Columbia Bar on June 27, 2023, certifying that attorney John M. Mcnichols is an active member in good standing, having been admitted on January 10, 2005. The document was filed on June 30, 2023, as Exhibit 19-2 in case 1:23-cv-03903-JSR (Government of the US Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.), likely to support a motion for the attorney's admission to the case.
019-01.pdf
This document is an affidavit filed on June 30, 2023, by John McNichols, a partner at Williams & Connolly LLP, supporting his motion to appear pro hac vice in the case of Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund v. James Dimon, et al. The case involves JPMorgan Chase & Co. as a nominal defendant and lists numerous individual defendants including James Dimon and James E. Staley. McNichols attests to his good standing with the bars of Maryland, Virginia, and D.C., and lack of criminal or disciplinary history.
20250728111721067_24-1073ReplyInSupportOfPetitionForWritO...
This document is a legal reply brief filed in the Supreme Court on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell (Petitioner) against the United States, dated July 28, 2025. The brief argues that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) signed by Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida, which promised not to prosecute 'potential co-conspirators' in 'the United States,' should legally bind other districts like the Southern District of New York. The filing highlights a circuit split on whether US Attorneys can bind other districts and contends that the Second Circuit's decision allowing Maxwell's prosecution violates contract law and the plain text of the agreement.
20250714161447132_Certificate%20-%2024-1073%20-%20Maxwell...
This document is a Certificate of Service filed in the Supreme Court case No. 24-1073, Ghislaine Maxwell v. United States of America, dated July 14, 2025. It certifies that the Solicitor General, D. John Sauer, served the 'Brief for the United States in Opposition' to Maxwell's attorneys, Sara Kropf and David Oscar Markus. The document also includes administrative instructions regarding mail delays at the DOJ and contact information for case management.
20250714161434468_24-1073_Maxwell_Opp.pdf
This document is a legal brief filed by the United States Solicitor General in July 2025 opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court. The government argues that the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) signed by Jeffrey Epstein in Florida does not bar the Southern District of New York from prosecuting Maxwell, as the agreement was contractually limited to the Florida district and Maxwell was not a party to it. The brief details the history of the Epstein investigation, the terms of the NPA, and relevant legal precedents regarding the scope of plea agreements binding different US Attorney's Offices.
20250606115543471_Extension%20Letter%2024-1073%202nd.pdf
This document is a formal request dated June 6, 2025, from Solicitor General D. John Sauer to the Supreme Court Clerk regarding the case Ghislaine Maxwell v. United States (No. 24-1073). The government requests a 30-day extension (until July 14, 2025) to file their response to Maxwell's petition for a writ of certiorari, citing heavy attorney workload. The document notes that Maxwell's counsel (identified in the attached service list as Sara Kropf and David Oscar Markus) does not oppose the extension.
20250507134103306_Extension%20Letter%2024-1073.pdf
This document is a letter dated May 7, 2025, from U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer to the Clerk of the Supreme Court regarding the case Ghislaine Maxwell v. United States of America (No. 24-1073). The Solicitor General requests a 30-day extension, until June 13, 2025, to file the government's response to Maxwell's petition for a writ of certiorari, citing a heavy workload. Attached is a service list identifying Sara Kropf and David Oscar Markus as counsel for the petitioner.
014-08.pdf
This document is a declaration by FBI Special Agent Timothy R. Slater, executed in 2015, detailing his involvement in the 2006-2007 investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. Slater describes locating and calling a potential victim (whose name is redacted) in early 2007 while accompanied by lead agent Nesbitt E. Kuyrkendall. During the call, the woman confirmed knowing Epstein but refused to cooperate, stating she had moved away to distance herself and wanted to leave the situation in her past.
030.pdf
This document contains a letter from Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Debra C. Freeman updating the court on the establishment of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. It attaches a Status Report filed in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands and the detailed Protocol for the Independent Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, which outlines eligibility, claims administration, evaluation methodology, and compensation procedures for sexual abuse victims of Jeffrey Epstein.
026.pdf
This document is a Motion for Limited Appearance filed on May 21, 2009, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case 9:09-CV-80591-KAM). Robert D. Critton, Jr. requests the court to admit Michael D. Shumsky of Kirkland & Ellis LLP as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. The document lists legal counsel for both the plaintiff (Jane Doe 101) and the defendant, along with their contact information.
EFTA00038158.pdf
This document is a chain of internal emails between the FBI and DOJ from September and October 2020. The correspondence concerns the review of a draft report by the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) regarding the Southern District of Florida's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation between 2006 and 2008. FBI officials, including a Unit Chief and Special Agent, are coordinating to review the report specifically to ensure its release does not compromise their '7A stance,' which refers to FOIA Exemption 7(A) protecting ongoing law enforcement proceedings.
EFTA00037015.pdf
This document is a Confidential Literary Option/Purchase Agreement between Braven Films LLC and an unnamed Author for the rights to the book 'Silenced No More'. The agreement sets an option price of $7,000 for 18 months, with potential purchase prices ranging from $80,000 to $300,000 for a film, or $10,000 per episode for a series. Notably, the contract stipulates that Steve Ross must be invited to any premiere screening alongside the Author.
EFTA00032893.pdf
A Law360 email newsletter dated May 5, 2020, summarizing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the legal and business sectors. Key topics include law firms (Nixon Peabody, Pillsbury) cutting programs and pay, retail bankruptcies (J.Crew, Gold's Gym), and court closures in the US, UK, and EU. The document lists numerous law firms in the sidebar, including 'Epstein Becker Green,' which is a corporate law firm unrelated to Jeffrey Epstein's criminal case.
EFTA00032633.pdf
This document is a Law360 Public Policy email newsletter from September 30, 2020. It covers various legal and political topics, including the first Trump-Biden debate, Supreme Court news involving Amy Coney Barrett, and regulatory updates from the EPA, FERC, and FCC. It lists numerous law firms and companies in the sidebar, including 'Epstein Becker Green' (a law firm) and 'JPMorgan Chase & Co.', which is noted for a deferred prosecution deal involving compliance technology.
EFTA00032400.pdf
This document is a 'Law360 Appellate' email newsletter dated April 22, 2019. It provides summaries of recent legal cases across various US Circuit Courts (DC, Federal, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 9th, 11th) and the Supreme Court, covering topics such as the Census citizenship question, Title VII discrimination, and patent disputes. It also lists legal job openings and mentions various law firms and companies in sidebars. The law firm 'Epstein Becker Green' appears in a list of firms, which is likely the only connection to the name Epstein, unrelated to Jeffrey Epstein.
EFTA00031081.pdf
This document is an email chain originating from Senator Ben Sasse's press shop, distributing a press release on November 19, 2019, regarding the arrests of the prison guards on duty when Jeffrey Epstein died. Reuters reporter Mark Hosenball forwarded the release to redacted individuals (likely at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of NY), noting 'Senator just put this out.' The statement quotes Sasse emphasizing that while the arrests are important, the primary goal should be prosecuting Epstein's co-conspirators.
EFTA00030767.pdf
This document is a Public Policy Law360 email newsletter dated July 20, 2021, summarizing various legal and policy news stories. Crucially, it includes a report that Ghislaine Maxwell owes the New York State Tax Department nearly $1.6 million, identifying her as a former associate of Jeffrey Epstein. Other topics include the confirmation of Tiffany Cunningham as a Federal Circuit judge, a potential $30M fine for Robinhood, and various other legislative and judicial updates.
EFTA00025383.pdf
This document is an email dated May 6, 2020, containing the text of a Law360 article. The article details a sentencing hearing for fraudster Terrance Morgan, during which U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman severely criticized the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) for terrible conditions at NYC federal jails (MDC and MCC). Judge Berman, who presided over Jeffrey Epstein's case, expressed disappointment that Attorney General William Barr failed to conduct a thorough investigation of the BOP as pledged following Epstein's suicide.
EFTA00018860.pdf
This document is a Law360 New York legal news digest dated August 27, 2019, summarizing various legal developments, court rulings, and corporate transactions. It covers topics such as robocall litigation, employment suits, securities fraud (including mentions of SAC Capital and Harvey Weinstein), and mergers like the Amgen-Celgene deal. The only connection to the name 'Epstein' in this specific document is a reference to the law firm 'Epstein Becker Green' and its attorneys Jeffrey Ruzal and Carly Baratt; there is no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein the financier or flight logs.
EFTA00018568.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 2020 discussing technical difficulties with a large PDF file received by the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The file is a draft report from the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) regarding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein matter by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida between 2006 and 2008. SDNY staff were attempting to make the 380+ page report text-searchable.
EFTA00018566.pdf
This document contains an email chain from August 2020 involving the Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). OPR Counsel Laura Ingersoll transmitted a draft report regarding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein matter by the Southern District of Florida (2006-2008) to the Acting US Attorney for SDNY. Subsequent internal USANYS emails discuss sharing this draft report with the 'Maxwell team' for their review and comments.
EFTA00014460.pdf
This document is an email chain from June 27, 2019, involving high-level DOJ officials from the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG), and the SDNY Public Corruption Unit. The correspondence concerns the search for a 'non-public appendix' to Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), which reportedly contains a list of victims entitled to compensation. OPR confirms they can assist and involves their lead counsel on the investigation.
EFTA00013989.pdf
This document is a letter from Kenneth Starr to a high-ranking DOJ official arguing against the federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. Starr alleges significant prosecutorial misconduct, including violations of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), leaks to the New York Times, and conflicts of interest within the US Attorney's Office. He claims the prosecution is politically motivated by Epstein's ties to Bill Clinton and requests a 'de novo' independent review of the case.
EFTA00013926.pdf
This document is a legal response filed on August 1, 2008, by attorneys for victims (Jane Doe #1 and #2) in the Jeffrey Epstein case, arguing that the U.S. Government violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The filing details how the U.S. Attorney's Office and the FBI secretly entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement with Epstein in September 2007 while misleading victims for months that the investigation was ongoing and that federal charges were still possible. The motion requests the court to order the government to produce the full Non-Prosecution Agreement and FBI interview reports, and to schedule a hearing to determine the appropriate remedy for the violation of the victims' rights.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity