DOJ-OGR-00002705.jpg
479 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
479 KB
Summary
This document is a legal filing from a court case dated February 4, 2021. The defense argues that the contents of a specific interview constitute exculpatory 'Brady material' and asks the Court to compel the government to produce any notes or reports from it, which are currently missing from discovery. The defense also notes its requests for the government to provide unredacted copies of two specific FBI reports that were part of the Miami FBI's investigation.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Minor Victim-2 | Victim/Accuser |
Referenced in a footnote as being subsequently called 'Accuser-2'.
|
| Accuser-2 | Accuser |
The name used to refer to 'Minor Victim-2' in the document.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Miami FBI | Government Agency |
Mentioned as the source of an investigation and documents obtained by the government.
|
| Court | Judicial Body |
The defense asks the Court to order the government to produce documents.
|
| DOJ | Government Agency |
Appears in the document footer identifier 'DOJ-OGR-00002705'.
|
Timeline (3 events)
A legal case, Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, in which the defense is requesting discovery materials from the government.
The defense
The government
The Court
An interview whose contents are described as exculpatory Brady material. Notes and reports from this interview are allegedly missing from discovery.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the FBI investigation mentioned.
|
Relationships (1)
The footnote states: 'We hereafter refer to Minor Victim-2 as Accuser-2.'
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,070 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 148 Filed 02/04/21 Page 12 of 23
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
The contents of this interview are therefore exculpatory Brady material and should be produced to the defense. However, the notes and any reports of these interviews do not appear to be in the discovery, despite the fact that the government obtained and produced documents from the Miami FBI’s investigation. We therefore ask the Court to order the government to produce to the defense any notes or reports memorializing these interviews [REDACTED]
There are also numerous redacted FBI reports in the discovery. The defense asked the government to produce unredacted copies of two such reports. The first is [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] (Ex. C). The second is
[REDACTED] (Ex. D). Each time, the government responded that it had not applied the redactions and had produced the documents as they obtained them. As to the second,
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
The contents of this interview are therefore exculpatory Brady material and should be produced to the defense. However, the notes and any reports of these interviews do not appear to be in the discovery, despite the fact that the government obtained and produced documents from the Miami FBI’s investigation. We therefore ask the Court to order the government to produce to the defense any notes or reports memorializing these interviews [REDACTED]
There are also numerous redacted FBI reports in the discovery. The defense asked the government to produce unredacted copies of two such reports. The first is [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] (Ex. C). The second is
[REDACTED] (Ex. D). Each time, the government responded that it had not applied the redactions and had produced the documents as they obtained them. As to the second,
[REDACTED]
5 We hereafter refer to Minor Victim-2 as Accuser-2.
8
DOJ-OGR-00002705
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document