DOJ-OGR-00005727.jpg
332 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
332 KB
Summary
This document is the table of contents for a legal filing (Document 391) in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. The filing outlines arguments against the admissibility of evidence from "The Palm Beach Investigation" due to lack of authenticity. It also argues that the absence of a "Detective Recarey" infringes upon "Ms. Maxwell's" constitutional right to confront and cross-examine witnesses.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Detective Recarey | Detective |
Mentioned in a section heading regarding their absence and its implication on Ms. Maxwell's rights.
|
| Ms. Maxwell |
Mentioned in a section heading regarding her right to confront and cross-examine witnesses.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| DOJ-OGR | Government agency |
Appears as part of a document identifier in the footer (DOJ-OGR-00005727).
|
Timeline (1 events)
The Palm Beach Investigation
Palm Beach
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the location of an investigation.
|
Relationships (1)
The document indicates a legal relationship where Detective Recarey is a potential witness whose absence affects the legal rights of Ms. Maxwell, likely a defendant, in a court case.
Key Quotes (2)
"The Proposed Evidence Is Inadmissible Because of a Lack of Authenticity and Personal Knowledge"Source
— Document Filer
(Section II heading in the Table of Contents, outlining a key legal argument.)
DOJ-OGR-00005727.jpg
Quote #1
"Detective Recarey’s Absence Implicates Ms. Maxwell’s Right to Confront and Cross-Examine Witnesses"Source
— Document Filer
(Section III heading in the Table of Contents, outlining a key legal argument regarding witness rights.)
DOJ-OGR-00005727.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,413 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 391 Filed 10/29/21 Page 2 of 11
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 1
I. The Palm Beach Investigation ...................................................................................................... 1
A. Message Pads ........................................................................................................................ 4
B. “CPU’s,” “Zip CD’s,” “CD’s,” and “Flash Cards” ............................................................ 4
C. Photos.................................................................................................................................... 4
II. The Proposed Evidence Is Inadmissible Because of a Lack of Authenticity and Personal Knowledge.................................................................................................................................... 4
III. Detective Recarey’s Absence Implicates Ms. Maxwell’s Right to Confront and Cross-Examine Witnesses .................................................................................................................... 5
IV. Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 6
i
DOJ-OGR-00005727
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document