DETECTIVE RECAREY
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Unidentified 'girls'/'females'
|
Investigator subjects of interest |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Unidentified person (A)
|
Interviewer interviewee |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Interviewee (A)
|
Unknown |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Interviewee (Speaker A)
|
Unknown |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Adversarial suggested |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Interviewee's brother
|
Unknown |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Reiter
|
Business associate |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Law enforcement and witness |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Robson
|
Investigator and interviewee |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Barry Krischer
|
Professional conflict |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigator subject |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigator suspect |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Unknown |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
No recollection of interaction |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Barry Krischer
|
Adversarial professional relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alison Gopnik
|
Investigator witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Zachary Bechard
|
Adversarial surveillance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Reiter
|
Professional supervisory |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein's houseman
|
Law enforcement witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-2
|
No interaction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Investigator defendant |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Government Exhibit 295
|
Author document |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Witness's Father
|
Investigative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Witness's stepmother
|
Investigative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Intimidation of police officers (trash theft, surveillance/tailing). | Various | View |
| N/A | N/A | A videotaped interview conducted by Detective Recarey with an unnamed witness about Jeffrey Epstein. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A videotaped interview conducted by Detective Recarey with a witness concerning Jeff Epstein. | Unknown interview location | View |
| N/A | N/A | An investigative interview conducted by two detectives with a female witness/victim. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A plan is made to contact one of the female subjects before she leaves for college. | Not mentioned | View |
| N/A | N/A | An interview or conversation as part of an investigation. The participants discuss the attitude o... | Not mentioned | View |
| N/A | N/A | A recorded conversation takes place where an investigator discusses the attitudes of girls involv... | Undisclosed | View |
| N/A | N/A | A recorded conversation, likely an interview or strategy session for an investigation, takes place. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A videotaped interview of an unnamed witness conducted by Detective Recarey as part of an investi... | Unspecified interview location | View |
| N/A | N/A | An interview was conducted with an unidentified witness about their knowledge of a group of girls... | An office building | View |
| N/A | N/A | An interview is conducted with an unnamed individual about their knowledge of a group of girls an... | An office building | View |
| N/A | N/A | An interview was conducted with an unidentified witness ('A') by Detective Recarey and an Unident... | An office. | View |
| N/A | N/A | An interview is conducted with an individual (A) by at least two detectives and another official ... | Unknown interview location | View |
| N/A | N/A | Detective Recarey makes plans over the phone to meet with a person named Dahlia. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Detective Recarey plans to meet with a person named Dahlia. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | An interview is conducted with an unknown witness. | An office | View |
| N/A | N/A | Series of interviews with Detective Recarey | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Dershowitz, Krischer, and Recarey regarding victim credibility. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Defense team presents MySpace evidence to discredit a victim. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Prosecutors (Krischer/Belohlavek) obstruct investigation by ignoring calls and delaying subpoenas. | Palm Beach County | View |
| N/A | N/A | A vehicle mileage log was mentioned: 'ending mileage was 6923', 'beginning mileage to head back s... | In transit | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Dershowitz, Krischer, and Recarey where defense investigations into victims were ... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Defense attorneys show investigators a MySpace page of a victim holding a beer to discredit her. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Prosecutors delay approval of subpoenas. | Palm Beach County State Att... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Dershowitz, Krischer, and Recarey where Dershowitz shared investigation results t... | Unknown | View |
017-12.pdf
This document is an appeal by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein against a Magistrate's Order compelling him to produce discovery materials, including correspondence with prosecutors, tax returns, and passport/travel records. Epstein argues that producing these documents violates his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination because he still faces a real threat of federal prosecution outside the Southern District of Florida, despite his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The filing also details privacy concerns for third parties (alleged victims), claims attorney work-product privilege over files selected by his defense counsel, and argues that his offer to stipulate to a high net worth renders the production of his tax returns unnecessary.
001.pdf
This document is a Notice of Removal filed by defendants Jeffrey Epstein, Sarah Kellen, and Haley Robson, seeking to move a civil lawsuit filed by Jane Doe from the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The defendants argue that the non-diverse defendant, Haley Robson, was fraudulently joined solely to defeat diversity jurisdiction and prevent removal. Attached as Exhibit A is a deposition transcript of Jane Doe (whose name is redacted) taken on February 20, 2008, in a related criminal case, where she is questioned about her age, MySpace profiles, inconsistencies in her statements to police regarding sexual contact with Epstein, and her interactions with various attorneys and law enforcement officials.
001-01.pdf
This document contains the deposition transcript of 'Jane Doe' (a minor victim) dated February 20, 2008, and a Civil Complaint filed by her mother against Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. The deposition covers Jane Doe's family issues, credibility, drug use allegations, and interactions with law enforcement, while the Complaint details the 'scheme' wherein Robson recruited underage girls for Epstein to sexually abuse under the guise of massages. The document also includes procedural filings regarding service of process on Haley Robson.
EFTA00014615.pdf
A legal opinion letter from attorney H. Dohn Williams Jr. to the U.S. Attorney's Office explaining the specific legal mechanisms Jeffrey Epstein used to avoid indefinite civil commitment under Florida's Jimmy Ryce Act. The author details how serving time in county jail rather than state prison was a deliberate loophole used to bypass the Act, a loophole that was closed in 2014. The letter asserts that 'money, powerful friends,' and the cooperation of the U.S. Attorney, State Attorney, and Sheriff's Office facilitated this unique arrangement.
DOJ-OGR-00018315.jpg
This document is a court transcript of testimony from a law enforcement officer, identified as Dawson, regarding their participation in a search of Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach residence. The witness names several other officers from the criminal investigation unit who were present, including Detective Joseph Recarey who read the warrant. The testimony details that the search targeted evidence such as massage tables, correspondence, and electronic devices, and describes the initial entry where three unidentified men exited the house.
DOJ-OGR-00018230.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, documents a discussion about legal strategy and evidence presentation. The defense counsel, Mr. Everdell, confirms to the court their request to not give a specific jury instruction regarding a photo of a minor, to avoid highlighting it. Subsequently, Ms. Comey informs the court that the parties have agreed to redact a portion of a video (Government Exhibit 296), which shows Detective Recarey reading a search warrant, before it is played for the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00030512.jpg
A letter from attorney Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney Lanna Belohlavek dated February 17, 2006. Fronstin submits evidence attempting to discredit a witness/accuser (whose name is redacted) by documenting thefts at Victoria Secret and providing a receipt for a sex toy purchase to demonstrate the individual was over 18 and acting voluntarily. The letter also alleges that Detective Recarey is spreading misinformation regarding the Epstein investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00030510.jpg
A legal letter dated April 10, 2006, from attorney Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney Daliah Weiss regarding the representation of Jeffrey Epstein. Fronstin confirms he is the primary point of contact for the investigation, though Alan Dershowitz is also retained as counsel. Fronstin requests a meeting with the prosecution team prior to the case being presented to a Grand Jury.
DOJ-OGR-00003010.jpg
This page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) outlines the Government's argument that the defendant has failed to prove prejudice regarding the unavailability of Detective Recarey and various unnamed 'Epstein employees.' The text argues that fading memories and lost witnesses do not automatically justify dismissing the indictment. A footnote clarifies that Minor Victim-2 was interviewed by the FBI, but not by Detective Recarey.
DOJ-OGR-00003008.jpg
This legal document is a filing that argues against a defendant's motion. The defendant claims that testimony from Michael Casey (agent for Minor Victim-1) and Detective Recarey would have been exculpatory. The filing counters that this proposed testimony is speculative, unsubstantiated, likely inadmissible hearsay, and ultimately irrelevant to the charges that the defendant assisted Epstein in the grooming and abuse of other victims.
DOJ-OGR-00032330.jpg
This document is a Palm Beach Police Department incident report narrative detailing the execution of a search warrant at Jeffrey Epstein's residence on October 20, 2005. Officer Michael Dawson reports finding three associates (Banasiak, Estes, Zeff) on the property, searching the garage where Epstein's vehicles were found, and seizing a phone message book. The report notably mentions the discovery of a locked gun locker opened by associate Janusz Banasiak, as well as two massage tables and a photo of a nude female found in a closet.
DOJ-OGR-00033086.jpg
This document is page 98 of a legal transcript from July 26, 2017. An unidentified witness is questioned about their knowledge of lawyer Burt Ocariz and his relationship with lead federal prosecutor Marie Villafona. The questioner also asks if the witness was aware of an alleged attempt by Villafona to have Epstein pay Ocariz to represent the witness, all of which the witness denies knowing.
DOJ-OGR-00033076.jpg
This document is page 88 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unidentified witness about their mother's husband, Paul, and his potential interactions with reporters. The questioning then shifts to the witness's knowledge of a Detective Recarey and a potential deal involving cooperation against someone named Epstein, as well as any contact with people who have been to Epstein's house. The witness consistently denies any knowledge of these subjects, and their likely attorney, Mr. Leopold, makes an objection.
DOJ-OGR-00033069.jpg
This document is page 81 of a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unidentified witness about their knowledge of several individuals, including Tony Figueroa and Zack Bryan, and events that occurred at a house belonging to a Mr. Epstein. The witness denies knowing most of the people mentioned but confirms they know Zack Bryan, leading to further questioning about that relationship.
DOJ-OGR-00033060.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding dated July 26, 2017. An unnamed witness is being questioned about their past interactions with detectives from Palm Beach, including a Detective Recarey, in relation to a Grand Jury testimony that occurred when the witness was 14 or 15. The witness clarifies that their dad, not Detective Recarey, drove them to the testimony, and an attorney named Mr. Leopold objects to a repetitive question.
DOJ-OGR-00033059.jpg
This document is page 71 of a deposition transcript recorded by Consor & Associates. Attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness about lying about their age on a MySpace page (claiming to be 18) and subsequently changing it to their true age four days before testifying before a Grand Jury. The witness admits to lying about the age initially but claims not to remember changing it back, citing that they had a 'bazillion' MySpace accounts. The page concludes with Mr. Tein asking if the witness remembers Detective Recarey.
DOJ-OGR-00005733.jpg
This document is page 8 of a legal filing (Document 391) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, dated October 29, 2021. The defense argues that admitting seized evidence based on the affidavit of Detective Recarey violates Maxwell's Sixth Amendment rights because Recarey (the original custodian) is dead and unavailable for cross-examination. The text emphasizes that no other witness has sufficient personal knowledge of the seized items, their storage, or the 'confusing' handwritten notes in the inventory.
DOJ-OGR-00005727.jpg
This document is the table of contents for a legal filing (Document 391) in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. The filing outlines arguments against the admissibility of evidence from "The Palm Beach Investigation" due to lack of authenticity. It also argues that the absence of a "Detective Recarey" infringes upon "Ms. Maxwell's" constitutional right to confront and cross-examine witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00005720.jpg
This legal document, filed on October 29, 2021, is a portion of a court filing arguing that a piece of evidence, 'Putative Exhibit 52', is inadmissible. The author contends it is not a business record and cannot be authenticated. The document discredits the potential source, a 'Mr. Rodriguez', by stating he gave something to Federal Agents in 2009 and was previously convicted of extortion.
DOJ-OGR-00032880.jpg
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report details the execution of a search warrant at 358 El Brillo Way on October 20, 2005. The narrative, written by Officer Michael C. Dawson, describes the search of Jeffrey Epstein's property, identifying three men present (Janusz Banasiak, Daniel Estes, Mark Zeff), and cataloging the search of vehicles, rooms, and a safe opened by Banasiak. The report notes the seizure of a phone message book and other items from the safe, and mentions the presence of two massage tables in a closet.
DOJ-OGR-00032858.jpg
This document is a Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report (Case 1-05-000368) containing surveillance notes and evidence handling narratives. It details surveillance of Jeffrey Epstein leaving for the airport, assessing his private jet on the tarmac, and unloading packages before leaving the county. Additionally, narratives from September 2005 describe technical issues with evidence tapes, including one tape being damaged during copying and another being discovered to be blank.
DOJ-OGR-00005858.jpg
This legal document is a court filing from October 29, 2021, detailing the defense's motion to exclude evidence seized from Epstein's Palm Beach home in 2005. The defense argues the evidence is inauthentic and unreliable, partly because the original custodian, Detective Recarey, is deceased. The Government counters that it will use other live witnesses to establish the evidence's authenticity at trial.
DOJ-OGR-00005731.jpg
This legal filing from October 2021 discusses the 2006 investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, highlighting a conflict between the Palm Beach Police (led by Chief Reiter) and state prosecutors regarding the leniency of the prosecution. It notes that while police believed they had probable cause to charge Epstein and two redacted individuals, Ghislaine Maxwell was not named in charging documents. The document also raises serious issues regarding the chain of custody of evidence, stating that Detective Recarey is dead and that the FBI allegedly received empty evidence packages.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019368.jpg
This newspaper article details the legal maneuvering surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically regarding a failed plea deal and a subsequent polygraph test where Epstein allegedly passed regarding knowledge of the girls' ages. It highlights allegations of witness intimidation, police reports of harassment by private investigators, and the involvement of high-profile attorneys. The article also mentions Epstein's connections to powerful figures like Bill Clinton and Donald Trump, and discusses the public perception of preferential treatment for wealthy defendants.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019198.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a book (Chapter 19) containing the text of a May 2006 Probable-Cause Affidavit by Detective Recarey. It details interviews with former Epstein employees Jose Alessi and Alfredo Rodriguez. Alessi, employed from 1993-2004, describes his duties and notes that Epstein received three massages a day from different women who, toward the end of his employment, appeared to be underage (16 or 17). Rodriguez's interview mentions masseuses being 'too young'.
No Subject
The entire document is a transcript of an interview focused on identifying a group of girls and their connections.
MySpace Evidence
Attorneys showed Recarey a MySpace page of a victim holding a beer to allege underage drinking.
Victim credibility / Investigator conduct
Discussed victim's website, marijuana use, and disputed claims about a PI impersonating police.
Interview
Series of interviews regarding the Epstein case.
Epstein Case
Series of interviews discussing the case and victims.
Epstein Investigation
Series of interviews regarding the investigation and victims' fear.
Epstein's intentions
Fronstin explained Epstein is passionate about massages and they are therapeutic/spiritually sound.
No Subject
Discussing warrants for Epstein and Sarah Kellen.
Investigation into Jeffrey Epstein
Discussion regarding the recruitment of minors, sexual acts performed during massages, and payments received.
Nadia Marcinkova
Described Nadia as one of Epstein's 'like, slaves.'
Knowledge of victim statements
Hypothetical testimony regarding lack of knowledge of what victims told USAO-SDNY.
Government Exhibit 295
Affidavit regarding seized evidence.
Arrest Warrants
Recarey requested warrants for Epstein, Kellen, and Dobbs. Belohlavek declined.
Surveillance
Reported being followed by a green Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
No Subject
The entire document is a transcript of a recorded conversation where investigators discuss strategy for interviewing 'girls' involved in a case. The recording ends abruptly.
No Subject
The entire document is a transcript of an interview focused on identifying and locating girls associated with Jeffrey.
No Subject
Detective Recarey makes a call during the interview, speaking to someone about meeting a person named Dahlia that night. ('Hello? Yes. Hey, Dahlia. Okay. Right...We're gonna meet with her tonight.')
No Subject
The entire document is a transcript of an interview focused on identifying and locating a group of girls connected to 'Jeff'.
No Subject
The entire document is a transcript of an interview.
No Subject
The document is a transcript of an interview where investigators question a witness about their knowledge of a group of girls, their relationships, and their connection to a person named 'Jeff'.
No Subject
The entire document is a transcript of an interview focused on identifying a group of girls and their connections.
No Subject
The entire document is a transcript of an interview focused on identifying a group of girls and their connections.
No Subject
The entire document is a transcript of an interview with a witness about a massage incident involving inappropriate sexual questions and contact.
No Subject
The entire document is a transcript of an interview focused on a group of three girls, their relationships, and their connections.
Victim's website and private investigator conduct
Enclosed examples of a victim's website showing marijuana fascination; disputed claims about a PI impersonating an officer.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity