DOJ-OGR-00001194.jpg
573 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
573 KB
Summary
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues on behalf of Ms. Maxwell for bail. It refutes the government's claims by stating that her relationship with her spouse is a strong tie to the country, and that discussions of divorce were a protective measure, not indicative of a weak bond. The document also asserts that Ms. Maxwell has been fully transparent about her and her spouse's finances, accusing the government of baselessly claiming she was deceptive rather than challenging the accuracy of the financial reports provided.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
The central figure of the document, whose finances, relationships, and bail conditions are being discussed.
|
| Ms. Maxwell's spouse | Spouse of defendant |
Mentioned throughout in relation to Ms. Maxwell's ties to the country, their financial assets, and discussions about ...
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Court | government agency |
The judicial body being addressed in the legal filing, which previously had reasons for denying bail.
|
| Pretrial Services | government agency |
An agency that the government alleges Ms. Maxwell deceived about her assets.
|
| DOJ-OGR | government agency |
Appears in the footer of the document (DOJ-OGR-00001194), likely indicating the Department of Justice.
|
Timeline (2 events)
An initial bail hearing for Ms. Maxwell took place.
Ms. Maxwell was arrested at some point prior to the events described in the document.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the context of arguing that Ms. Maxwell's relationship with her spouse is a powerful tie to the country.
|
Relationships (1)
The document states they had discussed divorce to protect him from the consequences of being associated with her, but that neither wanted it. It argues their relationship is a 'powerful tie to this country' and that the spouse was willing to be a co-signer for her bond.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,785 characters)
Case: 20-cr-00330-AJN Document 103-2 Filed 06/23/20 Page 9 of 15
mistaken. Prior to her arrest, Ms. Maxwell and her spouse had discussed the idea of getting a divorce as an additional way to create distance between Ms. Maxwell and her spouse to protect him [REDACTED] from the terrible consequences of being associated with her. Nevertheless, in the weeks following the initial bail hearing, [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] She and her spouse therefore had no reason to continue discussing divorce, which neither of them wanted in the first place. Nor was there any reason for her spouse to refrain from stepping forward as a co-signer. In sum, the government has offered nothing but unsupported innuendo to suggest that Ms. Maxwell's relationship with her spouse [REDACTED] is not a powerful tie to this country.
The government's assertion that Ms. Maxwell must not have a close relationship with [REDACTED] is particularly callous and belied by the facts. (Gov. Mem. at 14). As her spouse explains, [REDACTED] (Ex. A ¶ 12). [REDACTED]
B. Ms. Maxwell Has Thoroughly Disclosed Her Finances and Pledged All of Her and Her Spouse's Assets in Support of Her Bond
The government's attempts to rebut the financial condition report are unavailing. Significantly, the government does not contest the accuracy of the report, nor the voluminous supporting documentation. In fact, the government has proffered nothing that calls into question the report's detailed account of Ms. Maxwell and her spouse's assets for the last five years, which addresses one of the Court's principal reasons for denying bail.
Rather than question the report itself, the government attempts to argue that Ms. Maxwell deceived the Court and Pretrial Services about her assets. (Gov. Mem. at 22-23).
5
DOJ-OGR-00001194
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document