DOJ-OGR-00019587.jpg
593 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
5
Events
3
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
593 KB
Summary
This legal document, dated September 24, 2020, is a filing in which Ms. Maxwell requests permission from the court to be excused from publicly filing a redacted version of 'Appendix Volume 2'. The justification is that the appendix and related briefs contain confidential information shielded by a criminal protective order. The filing connects this request to two ongoing appeals she has filed: one against an order by Judge Nathan and another against an order by Judge Preska in the related case of Giuffre v. Maxwell, with a consolidated oral argument scheduled for October 13.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Appellant/Defendant |
The central figure in the document, making requests to the court regarding filing documents under seal in relation to...
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Issued an order declining to modify a criminal protective order, which is the subject of one of Ms. Maxwell's appeals.
|
| Giuffre | Party in a related case |
A party in the related case, Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-2413.
|
| Judge Preska | Judge |
Issued an order unsealing certain deposition material in the related case, Giuffre v. Maxwell, which is the subject o...
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| ECF | Government system |
Mentioned as the Electronic Case Filing system where Ms. Maxwell requests to be excused from publicly filing a document.
|
| Court | Government agency |
Referred to as "this Court" where Ms. Maxwell can file unredacted materials under seal.
|
| district court | Government agency |
Mentioned as the source of material in Appendix Volume 2 that is sealed/confidential.
|
| government | Government agency |
Mentioned as the opposing party to Ms. Maxwell's motion to consolidate.
|
Timeline (5 events)
An appeal by Ms. Maxwell addressing an order by Judge Nathan declining to modify a criminal protective order. (Case 20-3061)
An appeal by Ms. Maxwell addressing an order by Judge Preska unsealing certain deposition material in the related case, Giuffre v. Maxwell. (Case No. 20-2413)
Ms. Maxwell filed a motion to consolidate both of her appeals.
Ms. Maxwell will publicly file a redacted copy of her opening brief on ECF.
Relationships (3)
They are opposing parties in the legal case "Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-2413".
Judge Nathan issued an order in a case involving Ms. Maxwell, which she is now appealing.
Judge Preska issued an order in a case involving Ms. Maxwell, which she is now appealing.
Key Quotes (1)
"This appeal addresses an order by Judge Nathan declining to modify a criminal protective order. A related case, Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-2413, addresses an order by Judge Preska unsealing certain deposition material. Ms. Maxwell has filed a motion to consolidate both appeals. Oral argument in both appeals is scheduled for October 13."Source
— Ms. Maxwell
(Provided as grounds for her request to be excused from publicly filing a redacted version of Appendix Volume 2 on ECF.)
DOJ-OGR-00019587.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,306 characters)
Case 20-3061, Document 63, 09/24/2020, 2938282, Page3 of 6
yesterday). Ms. Maxwell also requests leave to be excused from publicly filing a redacted version of Appendix Volume 2 on ECF. As grounds for this request, Ms. Maxwell states:
This appeal addresses an order by Judge Nathan declining to modify a criminal protective order. A related case, Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-2413, addresses an order by Judge Preska unsealing certain deposition material. Ms. Maxwell has filed a motion to consolidate both appeals. Oral argument in both appeals is scheduled for October 13.
1) The unredacted opening brief references material currently under seal and/or shielded by the criminal protective order.
2) Appendix Volume 2 includes all the relevant district court material that is sealed/confidential under the criminal protective.
3) The unredacted version of Ms. Maxwell’s response to the government’s opposition to the motion to consolidate makes brief reference to confidential/sealed information.
To comply with the criminal protective order, Ms. Maxwell can file unredacted versions of this material only under seal with this Court.
In compliance with the criminal protective order, Ms. Maxwell will publicly file on ECF a redacted copy of her opening brief. She already filed a
2
DOJ-OGR-00019587
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document