DOJ-OGR-00009940.jpg

1.01 MB

Extraction Summary

7
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
9
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 1.01 MB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the questioning of a juror named Conrad. The questioning reveals that Conrad was aware of her husband's extensive criminal history but deliberately concealed it during jury selection (voir dire) to secure a place on the jury. The transcript explores her motivations and her understanding of her civic duty in light of her actions.

People (7)

Name Role Context
Conrad Witness / Juror
The individual being questioned throughout the transcript about her husband's criminal history and her conduct during...
Paul M. Daugerdas Defendant
Named in the case title 'UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,'.
Mr. Okula Attorney
Makes objections during the questioning of Conrad.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the proceedings, ruling on objections.
Mr. Gair Attorney
Suggests taking a break in the proceedings.
Conrad's husband Spouse of Juror
The subject of the questioning, who has an extensive criminal history that Conrad concealed.
Conrad's father Employee of Justice Department
Mentioned as working for the Justice Department and turning 80 on March 1.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
United States of America government agency
The plaintiff in the case 'UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,'.
Justice Department government agency
Mentioned as the employer of Conrad's father.
Southern District Reporters company
Listed at the bottom of the document, likely the court reporting service.

Timeline (9 events)

1976
Conrad's husband was indicted for check fraud and unlawful possession of weapons after trying to board an airplane with a gun.
Manhattanville, Kentucky
1980
Conrad's husband was sentenced to prison for receiving stolen property.
1981
Conrad's husband was convicted of possession of a controlled substance.
1993
Conrad's husband was convicted of probation violation and making terroristic threats.
1993
Conrad's husband received an 18-month prison sentence for harassment, burglary, and terroristic threats.
2011-03
Conrad's husband was arrested and convicted.
2011-03-01
Voir dire (jury selection) commenced for the trial.
Courtroom
2012-02-15
Direct examination of juror/witness Conrad regarding her conduct during voir dire.
Courtroom
Conrad Mr. Okula Mr. Gair The Court Unnamed Questioner
Conrad's husband was convicted for auto theft and served seven years and seven months of a ten-year prison sentence.

Locations (2)

Location Context
Location where Conrad's husband was indicted for check fraud and unlawful possession of weapons in 1976.
Location of an incident involving Conrad's husband in August of 1985, possibly related to attempting to board a plane...

Relationships (2)

Conrad personal Conrad's husband
The document identifies him as 'your husband'. Conrad admits he disclosed his criminal history to her and that she concealed it to get on the jury.
Conrad personal Conrad's father
Conrad confirms that her father works for the Justice Department and provides his age and birthday.

Key Quotes (4)

"And you concealed your knowledge about your husband's criminal career in order to make sure that you would get a seat on this jury, is that correct?"
Source
— Questioner (Directly asking Conrad if she intentionally hid her husband's past to become a juror.)
DOJ-OGR-00009940.jpg
Quote #1
"Yes, I concealed his career."
Source
— Conrad (Conrad's admission to the question about concealing her husband's criminal history.)
DOJ-OGR-00009940.jpg
Quote #2
"Are you trying to say that serving three months on a jury is akin to some sort of penance?"
Source
— Conrad (Her response to the questioner's suggestion that she served on the jury to vindicate herself after a disgraced career.)
DOJ-OGR-00009940.jpg
Quote #3
"Probably not, if I was a good criminal."
Source
— Conrad (Her response when asked if, as a defendant, she would want a juror who had perjured themselves during voir dire.)
DOJ-OGR-00009940.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (4,960 characters)

Case 2:10-cr-00338-PAB-N Document 646-120 Filed 03/24/12 Page 189 of 767
A-5657
February 15, 2012
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v.
PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,
C2FFDAU6 Conrad - direct Page 189
1 A. I understood that, sir.
2 Q. And did you know in March of 2011 that your husband had
3 been in fact arrested and convicted a number of times?
4 A. Yes, sir.
5 Q. And did you know that he had been sentenced to prison in
6 1980 for receiving stolen property?
7 A. No, not 1980.
8 Q. Did you know that in 1981 he had been convicted of
9 possession of a controlled substance?
10 A. Sir, I don't know the dates. I thought it was in the '70s.
11 I'm not sure.
12 Q. Did you know that he had been convicted of a probation
13 violation and of making terroristic threats?
14 A. That might have been '93. Vaguely I remember.
15 Q. Did you know that he'd been indicted for check fraud and
16 unlawful possession of weapons?
17 A. That was in Manhattanville, Kentucky in like 1976 when he
18 tried to board an airplane with a gun.
19 Q. So that's not the incident in August of 1985 in New Jersey?
20 A. Sir, I was ten years old probably then. I don't know. I
21 can't tell you.
22 Q. Was he indicted a second time for receiving stolen property
23 and burglary?
24 A. Sir, I don't know.
25 Q. Did he get 18 months in prison in 1993 for harassment,
C2FFDAU6 Conrad - direct Page 190
1 burglary and terroristic threats?
2 A. I don't know.
3 Q. Did you know that he was convicted for auto theft and
4 served, got a ten-year prison sentence for that?
5 A. No. Seven years, seven months.
6 Q. Served seven years and seven months.
7 A. Paroled out, yes.
8 Q. Did you know him while he was in prison?
9 A. No.
10 Q. You met him afterwards?
11 A. Yes, sir.
12 Q. And he disclosed his criminal history to you?
13 A. Yes.
14 MR. OKULA: Objection, your Honor, to marital
15 communications.
16 THE COURT: I'll sustain any further inquiry along
17 that line.
18 Q. And you concealed your knowledge about your husband's
19 criminal career in order to make sure that you would get a seat
20 on this jury, is that correct?
21 A. Yes, I concealed his career.
22 Q. Does your father work for the Justice Department right now?
23 A. Yes, sir.
24 Q. How old is he?
25 A. On March 1 he'll be 80. And I remember specifically that
C2FFDAU6 Conrad - direct Page 191
1 voir dire commenced a year ago on March 1, because that was his
2 birthday.
3 Q. Now, another question that was asked of the whole panel was
4 whether you or a close relative had ever been involved in or
5 appeared as a witness in a variety of types of investigations
6 including investigations by licensing authorities.
7 A. Yes, sir. And in retrospect, I should have mentioned the
8 disciplinary committee proceeding. I didn't just connect the
9 two at that time. And that was obviously a pertinent issue
10 that should have been raised.
11 Q. I see. So on March 1st or 2nd, you didn't think about the
12 fact that you'd participated in a disciplinary proceeding?
13 A. Please say it again.
14 Q. When you were testifying as a juror, potential juror here
15 on March 1 and 2nd, you weren't thinking about the fact that
16 you had participated in disciplinary proceedings?
17 A. No. I thought about testifying in my mind about having my
18 personal injury case and more along those lines. No, it didn't
19 occur to me.
20 Q. Even though you had filed your petition for reinstatement a
21 day or two before that?
22 A. I just didn't look at it that way.
23 Q. You believed that by serving on this jury you could get
24 some measure of vindication for yourself, didn't you?
25 A. Not at all. Vindication for what?
C2FFDAU6 Conrad - direct Page 192
1 Q. You believed that you could somehow vindicate yourself as
2 having done something worthwhile after a career that was in
3 disgrace at that point?
4 A. Are you trying to say that serving three months on a jury
5 is akin to some sort of penance? I don't understand really
6 what you're trying to tell me. It was my civic duty, which I
7 performed to the best of my capability and ability and I
8 believe I did it fairly, justly and unbiased.
9 Q. Was it your civic duty to perjure yourself in this court?
10 A. It's nobody's.
11 Q. So you didn't really do your civic duty, did you?
12 A. Of course. Rendering the just verdict in an unbiased
13 fashion, I certainly did.
14 Q. If you were on trial for a crime, would you want to know
15 that one of the jurors who was judging the credibility of
16 witnesses and had your fate in his or her hands had perjured
17 themselves repeatedly at voir dire? Would you want to know
18 that?
19 MR. OKULA: Objection, your Honor.
20 THE COURT: Overruled.
21 A. Probably not, if I was a good criminal.
22 MR. GAIR: Your Honor, this would be a good place to
23 break.
24 THE COURT: All right. We're going to take a
25 ten-minute recess and then we'll reconvene and endeavor to
Page 189 - Page 192 (48) SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS
DOJ-OGR-00009940

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document