This page is a transcript from the cross-examination of a witness named 'Carolyn' in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The defense attorney attempts to impeach the witness's credibility by suggesting she has an incentive to lie and questioning her about schizophrenia and alleged past loss of child custody due to substance abuse, which the witness repeatedly denies. Prosecutor Ms. Comey objects to the line of questioning regarding the witness's incentive to stick to her story.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Carolyn | Witness |
Under cross-examination; questioned about schizophrenia, substance abuse, and child custody.
|
| Ms. Comey | Attorney (Prosecution) |
Raises objections during cross-examination; previously questioned the witness.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Sustains objections and manages the questioning procedure.
|
| Unknown Questioner | Defense Attorney |
Conducting cross-examination (implied by 'Q' and the adversarial nature of questions regarding credibility).
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Footer information.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice, referenced in document stamp 'DOJ-OGR-00018847'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by case number format and reporter name.
|
"Q. So there is an incentive for you to stick to your story; correct? ... MS. COMEY: Objection, your Honor. THE COURT: Sustained."Source
"Q. Isn't it true that you're worried about your children being taken away from you because you've lost custody in the past because of substance abuse issues?"Source
"A. No, that is not what I said. You are wrong."Source
"A. It is not true, no."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,314 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document