DOJ-OGR-00010711.jpg
490 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing (court motion/brief)
File Size:
490 KB
Summary
This document is page 20 of a legal filing dated June 23, 2022, regarding the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. It argues that victims named Sarah and Elizabeth should be entitled to deliver oral victim impact statements at the sentencing. The filing requests that if the Court doubts this entitlement, they be granted more time to brief the issue, noting they only had 48 hours to respond to a previous court order.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Sarah | Victim/Petitioner |
Seeking to deliver a victim impact statement at Maxwell's sentencing.
|
| Elizabeth | Victim/Petitioner |
Seeking to deliver a victim impact statement at Maxwell's sentencing.
|
| Maxwell | Defendant |
Ghislaine Maxwell (implied), subject of the sentencing hearing.
|
| The Court | Judicial Authority |
The entity making the sentencing decision and ruling on the motion.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00010711 implies DOJ Office of Government Relations involvement or document custody.
|
|
| Southern District of New York (SDNY) |
Implied by case number format 1:20-cr-00330-PAE and 'New York, New York' location.
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where the document was dated/filed.
|
Relationships (2)
They are consistently grouped together ('Sarah and Elizabeth') in the filing requesting the same rights.
Document refers to 'Maxwell's sex trafficking crimes' and Sarah and Elizabeth seeking to make 'victim impact statements'.
Key Quotes (3)
"Sarah and Elizabeth believe that they have established entitlement to deliver their victim impact statements at Maxwell’s sentencing."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010711.jpg
Quote #1
"Sarah and Elizabeth have had just 48 hours to respond to the Court’s June 21st order setting out procedures for briefing this issue."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010711.jpg
Quote #2
"For all these reasons, the Court should allow Sarah and Elizabeth to orally deliver their victim impact statements at Maxwell’s sentencing"Source
DOJ-OGR-00010711.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,377 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 675 Filed 06/25/22 Page 20 of 21
receiving the most information possible in making its sentencing decision and allow all the victims of
all Maxwell’s sex trafficking crimes to speak.
all Maxwell’s sex trafficking crimes to speak.
IV. If the Court Does Not Believe that Sarah and Elizabeth Are Entitled to be Heard at
Sentencing, They Should Be Given Additional Time to Brief and Argue the Issue
Sentencing, They Should Be Given Additional Time to Brief and Argue the Issue
For all the reasons just explained, Sarah and Elizabeth believe that they have established
entitlement to deliver their victim impact statements at Maxwell’s sentencing. But if, for any reason,
the Court has doubts about this issue, Sarah and Elizabeth respectfully request additional time to
develop factual and legal arguments in support of their position. Sarah and Elizabeth have had just
48 hours to respond to the Court’s June 21st order setting out procedures for briefing this issue. Such
a short time frame has deprived them of an opportunity to develop both factual and legal arguments
supporting their position. The Court should give them additional time to develop their position.
entitlement to deliver their victim impact statements at Maxwell’s sentencing. But if, for any reason,
the Court has doubts about this issue, Sarah and Elizabeth respectfully request additional time to
develop factual and legal arguments in support of their position. Sarah and Elizabeth have had just
48 hours to respond to the Court’s June 21st order setting out procedures for briefing this issue. Such
a short time frame has deprived them of an opportunity to develop both factual and legal arguments
supporting their position. The Court should give them additional time to develop their position.
CONCLUSION
For all these reasons, the Court should allow Sarah and Elizabeth to orally deliver their
victim impact statements at Maxwell’s sentencing or, in the alternative, provide them with additional
time to further brief this issue.
victim impact statements at Maxwell’s sentencing or, in the alternative, provide them with additional
time to further brief this issue.
Dated: June 23, 2022
New York, New York
New York, New York
20
DOJ-OGR-00010711
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document