You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
DOJ-OGR-00017846.jpg
524 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
524 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from a sidebar on August 10, 2022. Attorneys Ms. Moe and Ms. Sternheim debate with the judge about the admissibility of a witness's testimony regarding a confrontation between 'Jane' and her mother, where Jane allegedly questioned her mother about money and implicitly acknowledged being abused. The discussion focuses on whether this testimony constitutes a prior consistent statement and its presence in the '3500 material'.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the legal proceeding and questioning the attorneys during a sidebar.
|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney/Counsel |
An attorney arguing for the inclusion of a witness's testimony regarding a statement made by Jane.
|
| Jane | Witness/Victim |
A person whose alleged statement to her mother is the subject of the legal discussion. She is described as having bee...
|
| Jane's mother |
The recipient of a statement from Jane, and was allegedly present during a confrontation.
|
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Attorney/Counsel |
An attorney arguing against the admissibility of the testimony, questioning its basis as a prior consistent statement.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein |
Mentioned in the context of Jane's mother being irate, but not the subject of a direct confrontation between Jane and...
|
|
| Jane's brother |
Mentioned by Ms. Sternheim as a possible alternative source of the information in question.
|
|
| Matt | Witness |
Mentioned in the header as the subject of a direct examination ("Matt - direct").
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (2 events)
A witness recalls being present when Jane confronted her mother, saying "How could you not know the money wasn't for free? How could you not know?"
a room
Relationships (3)
The document describes a confrontation between Jane and her mother, indicating a familial relationship (daughter-mother).
Ms. Sternheim mentions 'her brother', indicating a sibling relationship.
MS. MOE
→
professional
→
MS. STERNHEIM
Both are participating as opposing counsel in a legal proceeding, arguing before the court.
Key Quotes (3)
"How could you not know the money wasn't for free? How could you not know?"Source
— Jane
(A statement Jane allegedly made to her mother, which a witness recalls hearing.)
DOJ-OGR-00017846.jpg
Quote #1
"There's been no testimony by Jane about confrontation with her mother at this time."Source
— MS. STERNHEIM
(Arguing against the introduction of the witness's testimony by pointing out Jane herself has not testified about this specific event.)
DOJ-OGR-00017846.jpg
Quote #2
"This is a statement from Jane to her mother essentially acknowledging she was abused, expressing"Source
— MS. MOE
(Explaining the significance of Jane's alleged statement as an acknowledgement of abuse.)
DOJ-OGR-00017846.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,265 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 237 of 264
LC1VMAX7
Matt - direct
LC1VMAX7
Matt - direct
1 THE COURT: Okay.
2 (At sidebar)
3 THE COURT: What do you expect the witness to say?
4 MS. MOE: That he recalls being present when Jane and
5 her mother were in a room. He recalls Jane saying to her
6 mother, How could you not know the money wasn't for free? How
7 could you not know?
8 THE COURT: Is that in 3500 material?
9 MS. MOE: Yes, I'm happy to pull it up.
10 MS. STERNHEIM: There's been no testimony by Jane
11 about confrontation with her mother at this time. She
12 testified that her mother was irate regarding a guidance
13 counsellor, but she didn't go toe-to-toe with her mother about
14 Jeffrey Epstein.
15 THE COURT: So it's in the 3500 material; it's not the
16 first time you're hearing it.
17 MS. STERNHEIM: I don't recall if it's this witness or
18 her brother.
19 THE COURT: Okay.
20 MS. STERNHEIM: But even if it is in the 3500
21 material, if it is not on the direct of Jane, why can it be
22 offered as a prior consistent statement when it never was
23 offered at all?
24 MS. MOE: This is a statement from Jane to her mother
25 essentially acknowledging she was abused, expressing
2 (At sidebar)
3 THE COURT: What do you expect the witness to say?
4 MS. MOE: That he recalls being present when Jane and
5 her mother were in a room. He recalls Jane saying to her
6 mother, How could you not know the money wasn't for free? How
7 could you not know?
8 THE COURT: Is that in 3500 material?
9 MS. MOE: Yes, I'm happy to pull it up.
10 MS. STERNHEIM: There's been no testimony by Jane
11 about confrontation with her mother at this time. She
12 testified that her mother was irate regarding a guidance
13 counsellor, but she didn't go toe-to-toe with her mother about
14 Jeffrey Epstein.
15 THE COURT: So it's in the 3500 material; it's not the
16 first time you're hearing it.
17 MS. STERNHEIM: I don't recall if it's this witness or
18 her brother.
19 THE COURT: Okay.
20 MS. STERNHEIM: But even if it is in the 3500
21 material, if it is not on the direct of Jane, why can it be
22 offered as a prior consistent statement when it never was
23 offered at all?
24 MS. MOE: This is a statement from Jane to her mother
25 essentially acknowledging she was abused, expressing
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017846
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document